Microsoft to Take On the iPad with Surface Tablet

In the end, the rumors were half right: Microsoft announced not one but two tablets that it will sell as competition to the Apple iPad. The Surface-branded tablets will be based on Windows 8 and Windows RT, and will feature an integrated keyboard cover and kickstand.

“We want to give Windows 8 its own companion hardware innovations,” Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said at the Surface announcement, an event steeped in mystery and hype.

The Microsoft Surface tablet looks interesting. It comes in two variants: a Windows RT version running on an ARM platform that weighs 1.6 pounds, and a Windows 8 version that runs on Intel Core-based hardware and weighs 2 pounds and is much thicker. Both feature a 10.6" widescreen display, but then the specs diverge in odd ways. The Windows RT-based tablet comes with Microsoft Office 2013 RT and features microSD, USB 2.0, and Micro HD video connectors. The Windows 8-based version lacks Office but includes microSDXC, USB 3.0, and Mini DisplayPort video connectors.

The Windows RT-based Surface will ship in 32GB and 64GB versions, whereas the Intel device will come in 64GB and 128GB versions.

Both feature a “VaporMg” (which Microsoft insists is pronounced “vapor mag”) case and stand, which might be the new Surface tablet’s most interesting feature. Similar in look to Apple’s Smart Case for the iPad, the VaporMg is in fact much smarter, offering device protection when closed and a built-in, low-profile hardware keyboard that’s available when the case opens. A kickstand in the back keeps the tablet propped up at a good angle for typing and screen viewing. The case is available in a variety of colors, many vibrant and bright.

The Windows RT version of the Surface tablet will ship at the same time as Windows 8 and Windows RT, expected in October. But the Windows 8 version—which utilizes Windows 8 Pro—won’t ship until 90 days later. Why? Who can say?

This is interesting news, but it’s unclear whether Microsoft’s coming tablets offer any serious differentiation from the many Windows 8 and RT tablets its partners will be selling in the months ahead. But one thing is clear: This major strategy shift pits Microsoft in competition against these partners as well as foes such as Apple and Google. No technology platform maker has ever been successful doing this.

Microsoft, too, has seen precious little success with standalone devices. Aside from the Xbox 360, all of Microsoft’s hardware initiatives have been abject failures, the most obvious and recent example being the Zune platform. The company’s Zune HD, in particular, was well designed and beautiful to look at, but consumers stayed away in droves. And even the Xbox 360, loved as it is, was horribly designed: Repairs to the original console cost Microsoft over $1 billion.

Of course, the past isn’t always an indicator of the future, and Microsoft should be applauded for making many big bets with Windows 8. The Surface tablet is just the latest of these bets. And it’s certainly pretty to look at.

Discuss this Article 75

scottm99999
on Jun 19, 2012
@JayZeee74, It's certainly an interesting device, and is an alternative to the Apple ecosystem, but I think compatibility will be the key. How will existing software run on the Win RT tablet? I'd certainly like to test one, or both, of these devices.
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
@R: Existing windows software won't run on Windows RT at all.
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
Crikey: http://beta.fool.com/catominor/2012/06/19/could-microsofts-tablet-be-successful-zune/5942/
hawg16
on Jun 19, 2012
Don't be drawn in, Meh. Apple Fanboys hate innovation outside of Apple. Then, when they get cornered they throw out "They copied Apple!" and other drivel. Also, when confronted with their beloved Apple "innovating" from other work (see: Notification Center) they resort to silence or manic linking to articles from pro-Apple sites. Research "infiniteloop" for many, many examples of the aforementioned behaviour.
infiniteloop
on Jun 20, 2012
@Fanboyssuck: Wrong. I'm totally in favour of innovation. I just think Microsoft provide very little. Name one thing about the Surface Tablets that isn't available anywhere else. These things don't even have 3/4G connectivity. Even the keyboard cover already exists (see Logitech), Held on by magnets. Where have we seen that before? The Kickstand? look at Samesung's Tablets. This is a catch-up product. Sorry.
infiniteloop
on Jun 20, 2012
'Different' is not the same as 'Innovative'. The Surface Tablet (note: NOT Windows RT or Windows 8) displays not one piece of innovation not found elsewhere. Some people who go on about reading comprehension need to take a leaf out of their own book. Foolish is as foolish does.
chuckb84
on Jun 18, 2012
No ship date. No price. Paul gets it right, "While interesting, its unclear whether Microsofts coming tablets offer any serious differentiation from the many Windows 8 and RT tablets its partners will be selling in the months ahead. But one thing is clear: This major strategy shift pits Microsoft in competition against these partners as well as foes such as Apple and Google. No technology platform maker has ever been successful doing this."
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
@Meh: Not nearly as much as WinFanBois. *Chuckle*
forkieboy
on Jun 20, 2012
infiniteloop In October, when someone actually gets their hands on one, we will find out. Until then, it's all just conjecture. Until then, to me, it's just a big fuss about nothing. Marketing hype which may or may not be accurate. Many opinions, no facts. Proof. We can discuss it when it is a reality.
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
@JyZeee74: It's an act of sheer desperation. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. Apple is increasingly eating Microsoft's enterprise lunch and has already dominated the consumer space. Windows Phone is an epic failure. They cannot risk the same on Tablets or it's game over for them down the road. Hence they have had to develop their own hardware as their 'partners' seem incapable of developing hardware anyone wants to buy. It does remain to be seen how this effort fares. I expect some traction from the crusty Die Hards in the Enterprise who just cannot let go of legacy tech, for the full blown Tablet. The Windows RT version is the new Zune and will be as popular as Windows Phone. As in: Not very. In all, theres not much to challenge the iPad here.
dklippi
on Jun 19, 2012
Definitely interesting and worth a look, but I think for business users it will be best to stick with the pros (Dell, HP, and Lenovo) because of the support systems in place. I'm sure they will have some interesting configurations as well. @Yoshipod, I would guess they announced it now to try to get people to stop considering other tablets until these ship. This is probably not the case for you and definitely not the case for Klimecki, but for your average Joe that sees this on the TV news tonight or whatever they *might* pause.
PerryReed
on Jun 19, 2012
Based on the limited information we have so far about the Surface devices, I'm fairly impressed so far. They seem to set a pretty high bar for the OEMs to meet. And I think there are a couple of different ways Microsoft can win here. If the OEMs can come up with competitive offerings of their own, Microsoft will sell a lot of copies of Windows 8. If not, Microsoft may sell a lot of Surface devices. The only way this strategy fails completely is if Windows 8 fails completely, and if that happens, Microsoft has much bigger problems than just a failed hardware device or two. I think the primary message to the OEMs is that the crappy old "me too" tablets they've been pushing with Android are not going to cut it and certainly aren't enough to compete against the iPad. Microsoft obviously has seen that and aims to do better with Windows 8 (and Windows RT) tablets. The big glaring omission in Surface is the lack of any 3G/4G cellular data option. Certainly you can use the USB port to attach a cellular modem or USB-tether your phone (something you cannot do with an iPad), but that is a far less elegant solution than built-in data. Perhaps Microsoft simply didn't have any agreements in place yet with the mobile carriers and will announce something as we get closer to the devices shipping, or perhaps they've left an avenue for the OEMs to compete. I'm hoping for the former as I intend to get one (or both) of the Surface devices, unless an OEM shows me something more impressive, and I do want 4G data on my tablet.
mmccrea
on Jun 19, 2012
Hey I am a Windows Fan & MCP to prove it in W2K, WXP, MCDST, MCSE Diploma Course, CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Apple, Linux, BlackBerry, iPad, Windows Phone, Android Phone Fan as well. Our family home has many computers, desktop's, laptop's, servers, tablets, mostly new models but have a old linux box or two. I love my iPad 2, a lot. But it still is not a computer, it is an iPhone on steroids. Windows has done what i wanted to do make a full blown high end computer in a tablet format in-house, like Apple does. I will buy both models, Intel & RT one for Work & one for Social/Reading/Web Based Services. Good Job Microsoft for going all out! Hardware partners may not be happy but only you can make this work. Look what happened to XP Tablet Version by Acer? I own a Fugitsu T5000 since 2009 Tablet and it is running Windows 7 Pro and it still is not what i dreamed a Windows Tablet should function like. My vision is actually just what MS did with Surface, guess I should have put in in an email to them after i worked on my Fujitsu for 2 months, could have gave them the blueprint. Excellent Bold Move Microsoft, EXCELLENT JOB
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
I wonder where the Microsoft design team got their 'inspiration' from? http://www.samsung.com/ca/consumer/mobile/mobile-phones/tablet-accessories
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
Oh dear. Not looking too good. Is it? http://m.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/surface-why-microsofts-big-mystery-turns-out-to-be-a-big-mistake/20857
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
Tch Tch. http://m.computerworld.com/s/article/9228223/Microsoft_is_its_own_worst_enemy_in_bold_tablet_move_says_analyst?taxonomyId=12&mm_ref=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.google.com%2Fnews%2Fi%2Fmore%3Fpz%3D1%26cf%3Dall%26ncl%3DdXeo37NO_m4kisMjNayMF7j8wiTjM%26topic%3Dtc
ModernDislocation
on Jun 18, 2012
Wow... No release date, no price, almost no specs.... Microsoft knows how to capitalize on interest in a product release.
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
My my: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/06/19/microsoft-new-tablet-great-copier-surfaces-again/
jersey72
on Jun 19, 2012
Uh-oh guys.... infiniteloop seems to be manic again... He must be worried...
BananaJr
on Jun 19, 2012
16:9 is a terrible form factor for a tablet. Its good for video but not much else. Too skinny for reading or any other productivity work. The motorola Xoom has the same form factor and it hasn't sold at all. HP made the worst decision to leave this market. The touchpad was clearly better than any iPad alternative so far.
MSTAYLOR
on Jun 20, 2012
Like I said....easy!
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
Or maybe they got it from here? http://www.logitech.com/en-gb/tablet-accessories/keyboards/ultrathin-keyboard-cover
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
So. Microsoft's answer to the iPad is another fugly Laptop. Or two.
muraty
on Jun 19, 2012
Microsoft did a similar thing when it issued Zune players. The smart guys in Microsoft said that "our hardware partners are not doing it right. So let's produce our own player". result? an ugly and embarrasing defeat. Now the surface tablet! They didn't learn from history.
infiniteloop
on Jun 20, 2012
Seriously. You couldn't make this up. http://m.cnet.com/news/microsoft-will-withdraw-later-from-tablet-market-acer-founder/57456636
infiniteloop
on Jun 20, 2012
@forkieboy: If thats how long it'll take you, I'll wait. I look forward to you proving me wrong. Heh.
MSTAYLOR
on Jun 19, 2012
Unlike many others, I won't judge these devices until I use one myself. There are mixed reviews out there right now...even soem Apple fans seem to be intrigued. What I will say is that I actually agree with some of the thoughts regarding Microsoft sending mixed signals to its partners. One has to wonder if the devices that MS builds and sells will have better access to some of the APIs and details of the OS. One last thought from me...Darn!!! Ballmer is still there!
forkieboy
on Jun 20, 2012
infiniteloop Impressive performance, even by your standards. 12 posts and five of them didn't actually have a link. Are you developing a mind of your own ?
infiniteloop
on Jun 19, 2012
I hope Ballmer remains at Microsoft indefinitely. He's doing a great job for Apple.
JayZeee74
on Jun 19, 2012
I find it interesting that the tech press was not allowed to use the device for any length of time or actually use the keyboard. Not sure that leaves the public with any level of confidence. For as many things that Microsoft got right (creating buzz, slick cover), they got even more wrong (no price, botched demo, little to no hands on, no battery life, late presentation...) Always half baked, always late to the show. This makes no difference on Apple's numbers. It just won't have much of an impact. In addition Apple has now alienated partners, who will think twice and probably migrate to Android.
reunson
on Jun 18, 2012
"Both feature a VaporMg (which Microsoft insists is pronounced vapor mag) case and stand, which may be the new Surface tablets most interesting feature." I have to agree. The keyboard (and trackpad?) in the cover is a great idea. You are really going to need them for the desktop applications (intel only) However, I hope Microsoft has patented the hell out of it. Otherwise, Samsung (a Windows 8 partner / Android manufacturer) will have copied it and have it on the market, before Microsoft is even close. Samsung will change the position of the trackball or the space key, release it in different colours and claim it does not violate Microsofts design. Samsung is absolutely shameless at copying. Just you wait.
MSTAYLOR
on Jun 20, 2012
@chuckb84 - Bravo! Very well said and we actually agree on a lot of it.
JayZeee74
on Jun 19, 2012
Correction...Microsoft has alienated partners. What do you guys think...was that a bad strategic move? Or necessary to come out swinging...?
MSTAYLOR
on Jun 20, 2012
@kliloopi - The innovation is in the OS. You've even said that MS has done something different as opposed to iOS and Android. Tablet hardware has been around for decades. Everything else has been variations and evolution of that innovation. You should really learn to remember the things that you say over time. Otherwise, you look foolish (well, more foolish).
infiniteloop
on Jun 20, 2012
I'd be more impressed forkieboy, if someone here could answer my request to name one thing that is innovative about the Surface Tablet and prove me wrong.
jersey72
on Jun 19, 2012
Assuming I'm a "WinFanBoi", I'm not sure that i know what you're referring to. As I sit here posting this from my iPad, I don't have enough information on the Surface to actually form a full opinion. Right now it's vaporware. Call me in October. And as I've already posted, I think Microsoft made a mistake by yet again hosting a huge event to announce something that won't be out for 4 months. Again - call me in October. WinFanBoi indeed.
Rallicat
on Jun 20, 2012
I'm rather of the opinion that this is simply a 'Reference Design' product. And whilst there are plenty of people here claiming it isn't 'innovative', it's also not exactly a 'poor' product. It might not leapfrog the iPad, but even with all the unanswered questions, it's clearly not lagging behind either. It's also important to keep in mind that whilst many might claim this is not innovative compared to the iPad, Apple itself struggles to sometimes keep up an innovative pace. The iPad was innovative ... what did the iPad 2 bring? or the iPad '3'? Not much, just a product iteration with a spec bump. If it's valid to ask why one would buy a Surface instead of an iPad, then it's equally valid to ask why one would buy the latest iPad over an older model on eBay. Indeed, it's also equally valid to ask why one would bother buying a tablet at all - Microsoft sell hundreds of millions of copies of Windows each year. In the entire availability of ALL iPad models, Apple have sold around 70m. That should tell us something about the desire for tablet computing. People want more mobile, portable computing yes, but many people simply see it as a bit of a gimmick, or too limited. It lends itself to casual computing, and whilst it can offer some very powerful computing features - most people aren't looking to an iPad to provide that. It's not the Surface that changes that - but Windows 8 does. It will allow tablets to come to market that offer a broader range of computing experiences, including better, more powerful multitasking, an actual file system (and yes, I do think this is needed), better network support (again, needed in my opinion). At the same time though, those tablets need to LOOK like tablets - like real, proper iPad like tablets, and that brings me back to my opening point - it's a reference design. It's not the savior or downfall of Microsoft, it's the device that's designed to showcase what Windows 8 can be.
hawg16
on Jun 20, 2012
"'Different' is not the same as 'Innovative'" Yes. The Notification Center in iOS is 'different' than the one found in Android devices, right?
hawg16
on Jun 20, 2012
@chuck Well, it isn't vaporware, but pretty damn close. Reporters actually got their hands on the device and the keyboard cover didn't work. That being said, I agree with everything else you posted. 4 months is a pretty long time in the tech world. We'll still evaluate them as they will likely have hooks into Active Directory and other MS enterprise products. From that point of view, these devices are compelling and would be much better suited to the corporate world if it was true. Until then, it's just conjecture, though. Performance, manageability and security are the big three for me and if MS can prove that they have this, they may have a hit in the corporate world. Speaking consumer-wise, not sure I'm interested in this device yet. Windows 8 on a laptop/desktop so far is disappointing to me to say the least. To me, they clearly are targeting the tablet market with this OS, and it does not seem intuitive at all. When my 9 year old can fire up Apple TV and stream a movie from her iPod, that's pretty hard to beat.
chuckb84
on Jun 20, 2012
Meh and forkieboy have it right; this isn't a product it's just vaporware. The presentation raised -many- more questions than it answered. None of these issues will be answered until the thing ships. FWIW, I think it was a mistake for Microsoft to hype a product that is so far from release; it smacks of desperation. The integrated keyboard is clever and will probably be copied, although I'd need to type on one before I could tell if it's any good. The problem with iPad physical keyboard that I've tried is that they're small, 10.6" wide, whereas a standard keyboard is bigger. The Surface keyboard will have the same issue and who knows what the tactile feel will be. You certainly do see to very different corporate cultures at work in what Apple did with the iPad and Microsoft with Surface.I'm left with the impression that Microsoft just can't help going for "features" while Apple releases a minimalist product with obvious flaws that will be addressed over time. Apple made a simple product with clear limitations, Microsoft seems unable to decide if this is a tablet or an Ultrabook.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• The Microsoft
Technology Roadmap
• Office 365 Implementation
• Hyper-V Optimizing
• Windows 8 Deployment
and much more!

Come See Paul Thurrott & Rod Trent in Person!

Early Registration Now Open

Upcoming Training

Mastering System Center 2012

During over 6 hours of training you can join John Savill from your computer as he will walk you through the key components and capabilities of System Center 2012, what’s involved in using the components, and the benefit they can bring to your environment.

Register Now

Current Issue

May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.

CURRENT ISSUE / ARCHIVE / SUBSCRIBE

Windows Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the Windows Community in our Forums.