Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


March 27, 2008

AMD Introduces Long-Delayed Multi-Core Chips

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

AMD today announced the availability of its Phenom quad-core microprocessors, consumer-oriented desktop processors that the company had originally expected to ship in January. The company also announced the release of a new line of triple-core processors and an energy-efficient quad core chip.

AMD's quad-core Phenom microprocessors are technically superior to Intel's quad-core designs in that they are "true" quad-core CPU packages; Intel, meanwhile, essentially stitches two dual-core chips together, a process that introduces performance inefficiencies. But AMD's more elegant design has had a rockier release schedule. After announcing the chips in November, AMD delayed the broad release of Phenom from January because a design flaw.

That flaw has been rectified, AMD says, and the company is now shipping 2.3 and 2.5 GHz versions of the Phenom X4 9000 Series chips, the higher-end version of which is "unlocked" so that computing enthusiasts can tune the performance even higher.

AMD had other announcements today as well. The company is shipping the first triple-core CPU, the Phenom X3 8000 series, which it says offers a 30 percent performance boost over dual-core designs. AMD also announced the availability of its energy-efficient quad-core Phenom X4 9100e microprocessor, which operates at a maximum of 65 watts. AMD says the chip can be used in space-saving, energy-efficient "green" PCs.

End of Article



Reader Comments
AMD is still around? Huh.

jersey72 March 27, 2008 (Article Rating: )


Just like the 4-cycle internal combustion engine, the VHS format video cassette, and Windows, the Intel Franken-ship will likely outsell the Phenom.

Let's just be clear that "outselling" might not indicate the best design.

mwrisner March 27, 2008 (Article Rating: )


"Let's just be clear that "outselling" might not indicate the best design."

well considering that the lowly Intel Q6600 is still beating the new AMD flagship Phenom X4 in most performance benchmarks, i'd say that Intel's design, albeit not native quad-core, is still superior in every aspect.

XP

Waethorn March 27, 2008 (Article Rating: )


Uh... 9600BE's have been widespread for a while. True the B3 stepping is 'supposedly better' but I doubt they are shipping at a higher volume.

"Let's just be clear that "outselling" might not indicate the best design."

You must be joking if you think AMD has made a superior product. CHerry pick the worst performing Intel binned quad core and the best binned engineering sample phenom. I'll bet quarters to nickles the Intel will hit 3.0GHz and the phenom wont.

And don't throw IPC (instructions per clock i.e. architecture efficiency metric) out there. The day when core came into the fray was the day AMD lost the IPC crown.

---

On a sidenote: Acid 3, first defeated on Opera... powered by Windows Vista.

Sux it you googly butted wankies, http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/7713_large_acid3_100.png.jpeg

will84 March 27, 2008 (Article Rating: )


While I respect AMD for looking out for overclockers and people who couldn't afford the Intel tax, I gotta give it to Intel. They do make damn good processors. I just hope the new AMD's do sell well, because competition makes consumers the big winner.

Triple Core? Gutsy. No wonder both my machines us AMD. Sorry Intel, you gotta bring the prices down.

subzerohitman721 March 27, 2008 (Article Rating: )


I don't consider there to be an "intel tax". In terms of performance for price, Intel is quite reasonable. It simply appears more expensive in the Intel camp because AMD's most expensive, highest performing chip costs only 300US. Intel's 300US counterpart gives better performance, so it is a better deal.

Just because Intel's top dog costs 1k+ doesn't mean they are shafting anyone. It's irresponsible to the shareholders to sell completely unlocked cherry-picked engineering samples for maximum dollar. There isn't an X**** chip that won't do 4GHz+ easily, and won't trounce the bejebus out of anything else.

will84 March 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 9, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some more Windows 7 sales momentum, some Sophos stupidity, Microsoft's cloud computing self-loathing, more whining from the browser makers, Zoho's "Fake Office," and much, much more ...

Where is Microsoft NetMeeting in Windows XP?

...


Related Events WinConnections and Microsoft® Exchange Connections

IT Greenies: Ten Top Environmental and Cost Saving Technologies

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement