Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


February 29, 2008

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of March 3, 2008

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including a trip to Los Angeles and a trip next week to Vegas, Vista price cuts, Vista Capable not so capable, Hotmail outage, Windows Live dev tools, IE8 public beta later than expected, and more...

WinInfo Blog

I spent much of the week in Los Angeles, which was interesting for a number of reasons. I got to meet Tom Brokaw and Mo Rocca. I got to travel from a place that was 75 degrees (LA) to one that was -5 with the wind chill (Boston) in the span of five hours on Thursday. And most important, I got to meet up with a bunch of friends there, both from within Microsoft and without, that I haven't seen in a while. If there's a group at Microsoft that should be celebrating a job well done, it's gotta be the Windows Server guys. Seriously, dump all over Vista all you want, but Windows Server 2008 is pretty much unassailable. Sure, the Hyper-V stuff is a bit behind schedule, I get it. So what? Windows 2008 is solid. It was a good time, and well deserved. Congratulations everyone.

Next week, I'm heading to Las Vegas for MIX'08, Microsoft's Web development show. This will be the fifth straight week where I'll spend at least part of the week on the road, but it's also the last trip for a while, I hope. I'm starting to feel like a stranger in my own home.

Unfortunately, it looks like Leo and I will be unable to record the Windows Weekly podcast this week: I had hoped to get that done today, but Leo's in Vancouver and hasn't been able to get recording set up there. We should be back next week, I guess, but again, I'm away, so I'll need to figure that out.
http://www.winsupersite.com/paul/podcast.asp

Short Takes

Microsoft to Cut Price of Retail Versions of Vista
And that will be great news for the 17 people who buy Windows that way each year. Microsoft announced yesterday that it will be cutting the price of the retail boxed versions of Windows Vista Home Premium and Ultimate by 20 to 48 percent. (They don't actually specify what the new prices are, however.) The price cuts will take place concurrently with the release of integrated versions of Windows Vista and Service Pack 1 (SP1), Microsoft says, which will happen by the middle of 2008. Here's the thing: This doesn't affect much at all. Retail versions of Windows have always amounted to less than 5 percent of all Windows licenses sold, so it's unclear whether this change will make much of a difference to consumers or Microsoft. And it certainly doesn't affect the prices of the versions of Windows people really do buy, whether they're bundled with new PCs or sold to corporations as licenses.

Here's the Real Story: Windows Pricing in Emerging Markets
There's a side story to the retail price cut that I think is, in fact, the real story here: In addition to cutting the price of some retail versions of Vista worldwide, Microsoft is also consolidating and re-pricing various Vista versions that it sells in emerging markets. This is a much bigger deal to the company because of the potential financial upside to these markets, and I feel that the retail price cuts mentioned above are being made simply to put these products more in line with the way Windows is being sold around the world at retail. So what we're getting is Microsoft combining the retail Upgrade and Full versions of Windows Vista Home Basic and Home Premium into full versions of these editions in places like China and India, and then also reducing the prices of these retail products across the board. Microsoft is also lowering the price of Windows Vista Ultimate in emerging markets so that it costs less than an automobile in those countries. (And thanks for that, Tata Nano.)

Microsoft Lowered Vista PC Requirements to Please Intel
There are two things I've been complaining about with Vista since, well, forever: The arbitrary demarcation of the unnecessarily huge product lineup, and the silliness of its supposed minimum system requirements. (Actual quote from my Vista review: "Microsoft's official minimum requirements for Windows Vista are so ludicrous I won't even mention them here.") Well, it turns out they were at least partially made so ludicrous in order to meet the needs of its hardware partners. According to an internal email that was unearthed as part of the "Vista Capable" class action lawsuit, Microsoft lowered Vista's minimum hardware requirements to include Intel's 915 chipset, even though the chipset wasn't capable of displaying Vista's Aero graphics mode. An email war or words ensued at Microsoft, with one executive complaining that they were "caving to Intel" and "allowing Intel to drive our consumer experience." Now, Microsoft is in legal hot water over the move, because while Intel 915-based systems meet the "Vista Capable" guidelines, they can't show off the system's best features. This whole thing is silly and should have been avoidable.

Microsoft Owns Up to Hotmail Outage this Week
I guess you really do get what you pay for. Microsoft's Hotmail Web-based email service apparently suffered massive outages this week. (Though, to be fair, my account never went down from what I can tell.) After days of silence on the issue, Microsoft finally owned up to it. "The issue is purely impacting the log-in process for customers and largely does not impact customers who were already logged in," the company wrote in a statement. "We have made significant progress in decreasing the number of customers currently affected since initial reports, but the issue has not yet been completely resolved. Microsoft is working quickly and aggressively to resolve the issue and expects to restore normal operation to all customers shortly." I'm curious about their definitions of "significant progress" and "quickly and aggressively," but I'm sure they're super serious about getting that back up and running. In the meantime, if I could draw your attention to this Gmail thing I've been using for a few years now...

Microsoft to Demo Windows Live Dev Tools Next Week
At MIX'08 next week, Microsoft will demonstrate various developer-oriented tools aimed at getting programmers to take advantage of unique features of its Windows Live platform. Some of these tools are already out, including the recently released Windows Live Library, which provides ways to integrate Windows Live Messenger into Web sites, and the Windows Live Contacts API, which provides an interface to Microsoft's contacts system. There's a lot more, but since I'll be heading to the show next week, you can expect a full write-up in the coming days.

Public IE 8 Beta Won't Hit Until as Late as June, Microsoft Says
And speaking of MIX'08, so much for the IE 8 excitement that was expected for next week. While Microsoft will indeed show off IE 8 at the show next week and apparently issue a private beta to testers, the company doesn't plan to ship a public beta of the product until the second quarter of 2008. Stay tuned.

The Benchmarks are in: Vista SP1 as fast as XP!
No, really. OK, maybe. Well, hmm... So depending on how cynical you are, this might not be considered "evidence" in the strictest sense. A company called Principled Technologies was recently commissioned by Microsoft to prove that, er ah, determine whether the performance of Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 (SP1) finally achieved the levels of performance that were possible with Vista's predecessor, XP. I know you're waiting on the edge of your seat to find out the results, so let me just quote the report: "Overall, Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP performed comparably on most test operations." See? They're the same! And you thought all those complaints about Vista performance were real. Shame on you.

It's February 29, 2008: Where's the iPhone SDK?
So Steve Jobs and Apple are infamous for promising products at certain times and then not delivering. But when the company announced a February 2008 iPhone SDK release last fall, I figured there was no way they'd miss this one. After all, they had almost six months to make it happen. And best of all, this year is a leap year, so February even has an extra day. It was like they built extra padding right into the schedule. What could go wrong? Ahem. I'm sure it will be out soon. Using Apple Math (tm), my guess is they'll talk up the SDK by mid-March and actually deliver something to developers in, say, April at the earliest. Then, we'll see a truly usable SDK just in time for this summer's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), where the company will no doubt unveil a 3G-based iPhone 2.0 that, of course, will be the actual target of the iPhone SDK and will, in effect, immediately obsolete the 8 million or so iPhones that have sold in the interim. I'm only kind of kidding. This is how Apple swings, people.

And you thought Microsoft was Evil: Apple Uses Secret APIs in Mac OS X
Ah, yes. You may have heard Apple's PR silliness about its Safari Web browser being 10,000 times faster than every other Web browser on earth. Well, it turns out that Apple actually uses undocumented APIs in Mac OS X to artificially boost the performance of Safari on that platform, a fact that was uncovered by a Mozilla developer. He was curious why Firefox 3 was working better on OS X, given the performance improvements they'd made to the product. Turns out Apple is up to some sneaky tricks, the kind of thing that would cost Microsoft big bucks in EU fines, not to mention some seriously horrific PR. "It's just an unfortunate cutting of corners that is way too easy for a company that's not fully open to do," Vladimir Vukicevic writes in a blog post describing his findings. He was able to find a workaround and, no surprise, boosted Firefox 3 performance big time on the Mac.

End of Article



Reader Comments
Now thats what I call "Fair and Balanced" reporting from Paul. He dissed both MS and Apple this week!!! It should be a lot of fun for Waethorn and "lotsamystuff" to figure out where to start with this week's lovers' quarrel.

--tayme

tayme February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


"where the company will no doubt unveil a 3G-based iPhone 2.0 that, of course, will be the actual target of the iPhone SDK and will, in effect, immediately obsolete the 8 million or so iPhones that have sold in the interim. I'm only kind of kidding. This is how Apple swings, people."

the funny thing about Paul's "joke" here is that an iPhone actually is less likely to become obsolete compared to the vast majority of other phones - because it's so easy to upgrade the software compared to other phones (many of which are simply impossible to update by normal users - that's why they toss them and get a new one).

iPhones are also durable as hell. The hardware is so solid and with no moving parts, they are going to last years and years, with full software upgradeability.

cesjr February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


Paul's up to his usual tricks, defending the XP vs. Vista performance report on his "Windows Supersite" blog, while mocking the same story here.

And then there's his ridiculous take on the Mac Firefox story. Here's the full quote from Vukicevic:

"To be clear, I do not think that Apple is in any way trying to purposely 'cripple' non-Apple software. I also do not think that undocumented APIs give Safari any kind of 'significant performance advantage' (as Firefox 3 should show!). However, as I said, the undocumented functionality could be useful for Firefox and other apps to implement things in an simpler (and potentially more efficient) manner. I don't think this is malicious, it's just an unfortunate cutting of corners that is way too easy for a company that's not fully open to do."

Vukicevic made it clear that people like Thurrott were mischaracterizing the situation. This hardly amounts to "sneaky tricks, the kind of thing that would cost Microsoft big bucks in EU fines". Although it's nice to see Paul finally admit Microsoft IS up to "sneaky tricks". ;-)

The full post is here:

http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/02/28/finding-the-os-x-turbo-button/

lotsamystuff February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


"the funny thing about Paul's "joke" here is that an iPhone actually is less likely to become obsolete compared to the vast majority of other phones - because it's so easy to upgrade the software compared to other phones (many of which are simply impossible to update by normal users - that's why they toss them and get a new one)"

iPhone was obsolete hardware-wise already when it came out. No amount of software updating will turn that EDGE device into a 3G or HSDPA one. No wonder the European or Asian operators have not been interested in it...

tepesonen February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


@lotsahypocrisy:

Let's review what Paul said:

"You may have heard Apple's PR silliness about its Safari Web browser being 10,000 times faster than every other Web browser on earth."

True story. Apple has been touting the speed of Safari.

"Well, it turns out that Apple actually uses undocumented APIs in Mac OS X to artificially boost the performance of Safari on that platform, a fact that was uncovered by a Mozilla developer."

So now we know why. There was no mention by Paul of this being a malicious attempt to slow down other browsers - just that Apple was taking shortcuts to make theirs work faster.

"He was curious why Firefox 3 was working better on OS X, given the performance improvements they'd made to the product. Turns out Apple is up to some sneaky tricks, ..."

It is a sneaky trick. Taking advantage of private API calls to make your product go faster is sneaky. Again - not a malicious attack.

"...the kind of thing that would cost Microsoft big bucks in EU fines, not to mention some seriously horrific PR."

100000% true. Replace the story with Vista and IE and let's see what would happen.

""It's just an unfortunate cutting of corners that is way too easy for a company that's not fully open to do," Vladimir Vukicevic writes in a blog post describing his findings."

Paul did not pull out a malicious sentence by Vladimir. He simply grabbed the one that was the most important and hand the biggest impact.

"He was able to find a workaround and, no surprise, boosted Firefox 3 performance big time on the Mac."

And a happy ending for Mozilla.

No problem, and not malicious unless you choose to see it that way, which apparently you do.

Oh, and Mr. Pot - before you start complaining about people not quoting the full context of an article, maybe you should start doing the same.

jersey72 February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


"Paul did not pull out a malicious sentence by Vladimir. He simply grabbed the one that was the most important and hand the biggest impact."

He pulled out the one that made his snarky point, and didn't give the full context.

"before you start complaining about people not quoting the full context of an article, maybe you should start doing the same."

That's why I linked to the article. It was too long to quote fully here. You apparently didn't read it because you just alleged that "Taking advantage of private API calls to make your product go faster is sneaky", while the Firefox developer wrote "I also do not think that undocumented APIs give Safari any kind of 'significant performance advantage'."

Don't "Mr. Pot" me, kettle-man.

lotsamystuff February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


@cesjr: "that's why they toss them and get a new one"

As if the audience for the iPhone won't do just that? If Paul is correct in his SDK analysis, and quite frankly I think he is, although we are both just guessing, I think the demand for iPhone Take 2 will be huge among current iPhone users, and they will happily plop down the money to get 3G, more memory, and an SDK. This has been how they have operated with the iPod, so no real difference here.

"The hardware is so solid and with no moving parts, they are going to last years and years,"

Moving parts? What are you talking about cogs? Pulleys? I would hope it wouldn't have many moving parts. It's an electronic device. I've had a few LG phones, and while they looked like crap after dropping them for the umpteenth time, they still continued to function. Alas, new tech comes out and upgrades are in order. Without a replaceable battery or expandable memory, the likelihood of iPhone users keeping their aging pieces of tech is nill.

Dipsh t Admin February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


And to follow up on the iPhone SDK, even the very pro-Apple Boy Genius Report had basically the same things to say about the SDK.

"Apple is planning on locking down access to the SDK, hand picking which applications make their way onto the phone"

"Additionally, there’s good reason to believe that Apple will be presenting an SDK in the very early stages of development when they step up next week."

http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/02/29/apple-planning-on-limiting-sdk-access/

Dipsh t Admin February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


"I found hidden APIs in OS X that improve browser performance. But it's not like Apple's fault that they didn't document them. It's my fault because I didn't find them."

Could that be what he's trying to say? Naah. No one can be that fanatical about a hardware company.

shark47 February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


@lotsapot:

"...APIs give Safari any kind of 'significant performance advantage' ..."

Note the word "significant". Vukicevic is saying there was a performance difference.

But I'm sure I'm wrong and you're right.

BTW - I'm surprised nobody here has jumped on the survey that showed Apple users are more arrogant than Windows users.

jersey72 February 29, 2008 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 23, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some post-PDC some soul searching, a Google Chrome OS announcement and a Microsoft response, Windows 7 off to a supposedly strong start, the Jonas Brothers and Xbox 360, and so much more ...

2009 Windows IT Pro Editors' Best and Community Choice Awards

Picking a favorite product from an impressive crowd of competitive offerings is never an easy task, and such was the case with our Editors' Best and Community Choice awards this year. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement