Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


September 01, 2005

Creative Accuses Apple of Violating Patent in iPod

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

Less than a month after it was an awarded a software patent that covers the user interface Apple uses in its market-leading iPod portable MP3 players, Creative Technologies is accusing Apple of violating that patent. Apple released its first iPod in October 2001. But Creative was first to market with hard drive-based MP3 players over a year earlier, and the UI Apple uses is almost identical to that Creative pioneered.

"We are looking at all our alternatives right now," Craig McHugh, president of Creative's United States operations said, noting that while Apple was the only company it had identified as a patent violator so far, it was investigating others. "We're going to be very vigorous in bringing our new products to market and are going to be very diligent in protecting our intellectual property and our patent rights."

Despite obvious examples of prior art, Apple attempted to patent the iPod user interface in October 2002. But Creative had applied for its MP3 player UI patent in January 2001, before Apple's iPod was even a rumor. Apple's patent request was denied.

Creative hasn't decided yet if it will sue Apple or attempt to collect license fees for Apple's use of Creative's patented design. The potential upside for Creative is huge: though sales of the company's MP3 player products are dwarfed by those of Apple (Creative has sold 6 million hard drive-based MP3 since 2000, while Apple sells that many each quarter), Creative could use this patent to take part financially in Apple's iPod success, which arguably was driven in large measure by the easy-to-use interface it allegedly copied from Creative.

Apple has a few avenues of defense. It could ask the US Patent & Trademark office to re-examine the patent. Or, the company could risk a court battle if it can find examples of prior art that predate Creative's design (none of them, however, would have come from Apple, leading to the possibility that another company could attempt to patent the UI). Apple has refused to comment on Creative's patent thus far.

In related news, Creative's latest MP3 player includes an innovation that Apple is unlikely to copy. 4,000 of Creative's Zen Neon MP3 players inadvertently shipped to Japan from the factory with a functioning copy of the Wullik.b worm, which affects Windows PCs. Creative has temporarily ceased shipments of the device.

End of Article



Reader Comments
We live in a world where idea are forbidden because someone else might have had the same idea as you.

You don't want to create something because it might look like something someone else did and then you get sued. This is so pathetic. Welcome to the US.

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


I thought that this site was WinInformant?

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Creative is dying, after last quarters losses in the millions this is a desperate attempt for survival. If Apple wins this battle Creative will not doubt join Rio and soon Napster at the digital music tech graveyard, all thanks to the killer iTMS and iPod revolution!

"Creative's Zen Neon MP3 players inadvertently shipped to Japan from the factory with a functioning copy of the Wullik.b worm, which affects Windows PCs." - HAHAAHA!!! Where is the outrage?!

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


I am one that patenting simple user interfaces that are menu based should not be done. In my interpretation winamp, is a portable mp3 player, that is menu based and runs on portable machines (noteooks). This will in a way help balance out the universe in the mp3 market etween the two companies. It can also make creative a monopoly driving mp3 player prices up aain up to new levels. Think aout it, Creative sells thier units for a reasonable price, and charges other manufactuers a hefty licence fee, causing higer prices and less profits, jsut think about the end result. This case is similar to microsoft copying Apples GUI, a while back. Imagine if microsoft had to pay licence fees. The pattent office should have placed this in the same bracket as that answer GUI's that are common practices should be public domain. Cell phone manufactuers, PDA manufactuers are all subject to investigation now since the use a menu to play MP3 Music, even talet PC'c Are subject. THis is such a general patent it's rediculious.

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Sosumi

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Look! All the Apple bigots have something to cry about...

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Is this a new patent idea? "Creative is said to ship 4,000 wormy MP3 players"

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Another victim of the innovative, creative Apple. No wonder Microsoft is also dying. Vista is going to be the biggest flop since Windows ME.

Windows--for playing videogames in your admin account while anti-virus, anti-spyware, firewall, and registry cleaner software runs in your system tray.

Macs--for getting real work done.

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


I guess this is the only way competitors will be able to try and topple the rising Apple behemoth. It will fail, of course, but expect whining M$ defenders and Creative defenders to rally behind it.

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


"We're going to be very vigorous in bringing our new products to market and are going to be very diligent in protecting our intellectual property and our patent rights."

LOL. Is this the only way Creative can compete? Patent litigation?

Expect this to get tossed out due to prior art. List-based interfaces aren't exactly something new. It's sickening that Paul would say Creative "pioneered" list-based interfaces.

Anonymous User September 01, 2005 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4   5   6   7 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
What You Need to Know About Microsoft's x64 Server Product Plans

What do Longhorn Server, Windows Compute Cluster Server, and Windows Vista have in common? The x64 platform. ...

Anti-Virus Vendors Prepare for War with Microsoft ... Again

When Microsoft announced its Windows Live OneCare security and PC health product over five years (as MSN OneCare), Symantec, McAfee, and the other consumer-oriented security vendors reacted with stunning vigor. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format

Test Drive IT Solutions and Get Free Music Downloads
Solve your toughest IT problems with these free downloads and receive 5 free music downloads!


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home asp.netPRO Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing