Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


February 23, 2005

AMD Pledges Dual-Core Athlon 64 by End of 2005

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

Microprocessor upstart AMD has pledged to ship a dual-core version of its x64-compatible Athlon 64 chip by the end of 2005, turning up the heat on rival Intel. The announcement comes just a day after Intel released x64-compatible versions of the Pentium 4 microprocessor. Chips based on the x64 platform process data in 64-bit chunks, and can address far more memory than today's 32-bit x86-based designs. However, the retain full compatibility with x86 software.

"Since 1999, we’ve been developing a multi-core strategy in collaboration with our customers," said AMD corporate vice president Marty Seyer, who oversees the Computation Products Group of the company's Microprocessor Business Unit. "Because customer needs drive our innovations, customers will be able to adopt upcoming dual-core AMD64 processor-based systems without disrupting their existing infrastructure. We are committed to introducing straightforward technologies that deliver the best performance."

Dual core microprocessors feature two processor cores in a single chip, giving users most of the benefits and performance of two discrete microprocessors. Although modern operating systems such as Windows XP Professional are designed to support two processors, today, most PCs ship with just a single processor. Dual-core chips will help users economically gain better performance across the board while using such operating systems.

Previously, AMD had shown off dual-core versions of its high-end Opteron microprocessor, which is also x64-compatible. At Linux World Boston last week, the company demonstrated server systems utilizing four dual-core Opteron chips. Dual-core Opteron chips will ship by mid-2005, AMD says.

However, the dual-core Athlon 64 is potentially more significant, because those chips ship in huge volumes to consumers in mainstream PCs. AMD's dual core Athlon 64, code-named Toledo, will ship in the second half of 2005. However, that time period is roughly 4 to six months after Intel plans to release dual-core versions of the Pentium 4. Beating AMD to market is key for Intel: It faltered on x64 compatibility and only belatedly announced support for the technology a year ago. During the intervening time period, AMD has won accolades for its trend-setting work making the x86 platform compatible with 64-bit technology and ushering in the next major computer technology migration.

End of Article



Reader Comments
We just got a lowly Sempron and really like it for what it is (AMD is getting really good). I bet theseupcoming "dual-core" things will be very popular.

And speaking of dual-core, although not quite fully dual-core, my Intel P4 HT works like a charm.

msgstephen February 23, 2005 (Article Rating: )


AMD is an "upstart"? o_0

Anonymous User February 23, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Yawn!
IBM and group have the cell. Intel and ADM need to catch up.

Anonymous User February 23, 2005


Yawn!
IBM and group have the cell. Intel and ADM need to catch up.

Anonymous User February 23, 2005


Microsoft pledged to have Longhorn by 200!. 2006 Longhorn Beta for consumers, 2009 Longhorn promised full features.

Anonymous User February 24, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Cool, the wintards can now dedicate a virtual processor to exclusively run viruses and spyware without slowing down the OS.

Anonymous User February 24, 2005 (Article Rating: )


At least the Windows camp have an OS that can be slowed. KDE *spark* *bing* *twick* is already so slow and hangs so often. Of course, technically KDE is not Linux, but tell that to someone when it's so hung nothing can be done. Oh, but you can telenet it they say. Oh can you? .. I say. All's I have to do is arrange a telnet session. Great, I will remember to set up a permanent telnet so I can unlock the endless KDE hangs - that is if I ever waste my time with Linux again which is unlikely.

msgstephen February 24, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Are anybody moderating this comments????

Anonymous User February 25, 2005 (Article Rating: )


yeah well KDE sucks on anything less then 500MHz.
Intel are retards and are taking the Wintard's stance of "we own the market so lets stop trying".

Anonymous User March 01, 2005


AMD isn't an upstart, Paul

Anonymous User March 01, 2005


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 9, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some more Windows 7 sales momentum, some Sophos stupidity, Microsoft's cloud computing self-loathing, more whining from the browser makers, Zoho's "Fake Office," and much, much more ...

How can I stop and start services from the command line?

...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement