Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


April 16, 2004

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of April 19

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news...

 
Microsoft Won't Cut as Many Longhorn Features as Reported
  
According to Microsoft sources, a "BusinessWeek" report that detailed cutbacks in the Longhorn feature set was a bit exaggerated. Although Microsoft will indeed cut features as the product gets closer to fruition, the company is now saying that none of the features the company demonstrated at Microsoft Professional Developers Conference (PDC) 2003 in October will be cut, and that the three main pillars of the product--the Avalon presentation layer, the WinFS storage engine, and the Indigo collaboration components--will appear in the next major Windows release as planned.

Monti: EU Sought the Minimum Fine
   Defending the European Union (EU) antitrust case against Microsoft this week, European Competition Commissioner Mario Monti described the $612 million fine levied against the software giant as "the minimum necessary to allow effective competition. As a percentage of turnover, the fine is far from being the highest imposed by the [European] Commission, although in absolute terms it is high simply because of the enormous turnover of Microsoft in the EU." In other words, we went easy on you, Microsoft. That fact won't prevent the company from launching an appeal, of course.

Microsoft Simplifies Protocol Licensing
   In response to complaints from regulators at the US Department of Justice (DOJ), this week Microsoft eased the terms of the protocol licensing program that the company set up in the wake of its US antitrust settlement. The Microsoft Communications Protocol Program (MCPP) now covers additional Microsoft technologies for server-to-server communication and includes simplified technical documentation that competitors can use to create solutions that work well with Microsoft's server products. Since January, three new licensees--GeoTrust, Sun Microsystems, and AOL Time Warner--have signed up for the program.

April Patch Day Overwhelms Microsoft Servers
   Microsoft's controversial April 2004 monthly security patch--in which the company fixed more than 20 security flaws, some of which were several months old--apparently caused quite a flutter among security-minded customers. Because of record demand, Microsoft Windows Update servers were almost overwhelmed for several hours Wednesday as almost four million simultaneous users caused the servers to reach a sustained download rate of more than 50GB a second. Microsoft says that the feeding frenzy lasted about 4 hours, which raises an interesting question. Perhaps the people who quietly receive Automatic Updates should get such security updates first--a day before Microsoft makes them available for manual download. That way, customers who take steps to automatically update their systems will be rewarded, and customers who make knee-jerk reactions to security alerts get what they deserve. I know that statement sounds harsh, but we need to start using our heads a bit more when it comes to security.

Microsoft Opens Up Visio XML Schema
   Yesterday, Microsoft opened up the XML schema that Microsoft Office Visio 2003 uses, letting third parties more easily create solutions that interact with the diagramming software. Visio has changed dramatically since Microsoft purchased the product. Once a fairly basic static diagramming tool, the product can now visualize dynamic data that's stored on a back-end data source and which, potentially, Web services can access. This royalty-free release opens up the product significantly--a big step for a company that proudly wears its "proprietary" label.

LindowsOS Becomes Linspire
   Giving in to worldwide legal pressure from Microsoft, Lindows.com has changed the name of its flagship Linux distribution to Linspire. Currently under attack in the United States and Europe because the name Lindows is so similar to Windows, the company decided it was best to change the name, if only temporarily, so it could continue to do business. "Despite our victories in the United States and overseas, a name change is still necessary to counter Microsoft's strategy to sue us in courts around the world," Lindows Founder and CEO Michael Robertson said. "We're hoping that this puts a halt on the international lawsuits." Microsoft pledged to pursue its case in the United States, just to keep things interesting.

Gosling Toes the Sun Company Line
   Java inventor James Gosling hasn't had many friendly words for Microsoft during the past decade, but what a difference a $1.9 billion settlement makes. This week, Gosling (now a Sun Microsystems vice president and fellow) defended Sun's settlement with Microsoft and addressed concerns that the settlement document rarely mentioned the Java programming language. "We didn't ... [sell] out the Java community," Gosling said. "We have not sold our soul to the Dark Side. We haven't overnight turned into mindless lap dogs. We've had a lot of experience with Microsoft over the years, and it has made us very cautious. We're not a bunch of moronic secret subversive Microsoft lapdogs. We've worked very hard over the years to fairly balance the needs of all the various communities. Relax. Have a little faith." But the problem is that after years of Sun's pretense of pursuing a more open route with Java, trust in the company is at all-time low. All we have right now is a little faith.

Microsoft Plans Massive Chinese Investment
  
Microsoft said this week that it will invest tens of millions of dollars in the fledgling Chinese software industry, hoping to erase the decades of software piracy that has almost made one of the world's largest potential markets financially useless to the company. It doesn't help that the Chinese government has cast a blind eye to the rampant piracy and has made clear its preference for homegrown products. And you thought Microsoft had problems with the US and European governments.

Settled, Settling, and To Be Settled
  
We seem to hear about a new Microsoft settlement every week, but don't worry. The company has plenty of legal battles left to fight. In addition to the high-profile EU and RealNetworks antitrust cases, Microsoft also faces an unresolved Eolas patent battle, a Minnesota class-action lawsuit, and a slew of other small cases that will head to trial--or be settled--in the days ahead. With more $50 billion in the bank and a self-imposed July deadline to figure what to do with all that cash, Microsoft has the money to burn and a short time in which to do so. So if you're looking for a handout, this is a great time to face down the company in court. Expect to see more settlements during the next few months.

Dell Back To Where It Belongs as PC Shipments Surge
   Thanks to stronger-than-expected PC shipments, Dell returned to the number-one PC-maker spot last quarter. If you're following the Dell and HP rivalry, take note: Dell sold more than 1 million more PCs than HP sold in the quarter, widening the gap between the two companies. Dell sold 7.7 million PCs between January and March, giving it 18.6 percent of the worldwide PC market (Dell commands more than 30 percent of the US market). IBM came in third. In good news for the wider industry, overall PC sales rose dramatically in the first quarter. IDC reported that more than 41.3 million units shipped in the quarter, up 17 percent year over year, beating analysts' projections. Gartner's figures were even higher. The firm reported that PC makers sold 45.3 million units worldwide, up 13.4 percent.

Apple Profits Triple on Strong iPod Sales
   Thanks to strong sales of the Apple iPod--but not the iPod Mini, which is stuck in a parts-supply quagmire--Apple Computer posted a net profit of $46 million on revenues of $1.91 billion for the quarter that ended on March 31. The company's profits almost tripled when compared with the same quarter last year, and Apple shipped a whopping 807,000 iPods, making it the undisputed ruler of the portable digital-audio-device market. However, Apple's core business isn't doing so hot, especially when you consider the rate at which the wider PC market is growing. Apple sold just 749,000 Macintosh systems in the quarter, giving the company a sagging 1.7 percent of the market. Even struggling PC maker Gateway--which recently closed all its retail stores--owned 2.7 percent of the market during the quarter. And when you combine Gateway's market share with the market share of the recently acquired eMachines, the company owns almost 6 percent of the market. So what do these financials mean for Apple? Assuming that the company's computer business is dying and that its consumer-electronics business is growing, I think we'll see a smaller, consumer-electronics company emerge. The problem for Apple is that it's pursuing the same proprietary strategy with the iPod that hurt its Mac line. Stay tuned.

Heading to Phoenix
   I'll be on vacation next week, visiting Phoenix with my wife and children, and Keith Furman will fill in for me again. Thanks in advance to Keith. I'll be back a week from Monday. Have a great week.

End of Article



Reader Comments
"Perhaps the people who silently receive Automatic Updates should get such security updates first, a day before Microsoft makes them available to manual downloaders. That way, those who take steps to automatically update their systems will be rewarded, while those who make knee-jerk reactions to security alerts get what they deserve. I know that sounds harsh, but we need to start using our heads a bit more when it comes to security."

This idea completely leaves out Corporate customers who shouldn't be having their users do Automatic Updates. Enterprises need to download the updates when they're made available and begin testing immediately. There is nothing knee-jerk about it.

Kevin Eddy April 16, 2004


Comment in RE to your comment about those that don't use Automatic Updates and waiting for patch-day to download as "knee-jerk reactions to security alerts get what they deserve":
Paul, come on, I've seen you over and over say turn on Automatic Updates without recognizing the reality of doing so is not so simple. First, who are you targeting, anyone, consumers or companies? If companies, especially large companies, it is absolutely not realistic to use AU. I work for one and we have 300+ applications and each patch must be tested throughly to ensure it doesn't break something (which MS has done). MS and best practices state these patches are not regression tested and should be tested within your environment before deployment. How can you use AU with that kind of reality? You can't and making your comment is down-right dumb!
Even as a consumer on my personal PC, I won't turn it on as I have been stung by a patch breaking something on my machine. BUT, I am security conscious enough to be ready on the designated Tues. to get my patches and start my patch management pronto. Your statement is completely obvlious to this reality and the statement is, again, DUMB!

Gary April 16, 2004


<i>Although Microsoft will indeed cut features as the product gets closer to fruition, the company is now saying that none of the features the company demonstrated at Microsoft Professional Developers Conference (PDC) 2003 in October will be cut, and that the three main pillars of the product--the Avalon presentation layer, the WinFS storage engine, and the Indigo collaboration components--will appear in the next major Windows release as planned.</i><br><br>

Yes, but how complete will they be?<br><br>

<i>Yesterday, Microsoft opened up the XML schema that Microsoft Office Visio 2003 uses, letting third parties more easily create solutions that interact with the diagramming software.</i><br><br>

Yes. With embedded, proprietary-only extensions :).<br><br>

<i>Microsoft said this week that it will invest tens of millions of dollars in the fledgling Chinese software industry, hoping to erase the decades of software piracy that has almost made one of the world's largest potential markets financially useless to the company.</i><br><br>

Dream on.<br><br>

<i>The problem for Apple is that it's pursuing the same proprietary strategy with the iPod that hurt its Mac line.</i><br><br>

Well yes, I think that's a problem.

David April 17, 2004


I find it amusing that Windows fan-boys like Paul always refer to Apple's share of the overall PC market, rather than breaking Apple's share in specific verticals, which could potentially show a number higher than this 1.7%.


Editor's note: Yeah, let's see. In candy-colored computers, Apple has a 96 percent market share. Hey, that's relevant! Verticals are, by definition, niche markets, and not measured by any major market analysts. We still measure diesel vehicle sales against all automobile sales, for example. On the other hand, I suspect Apple is still pretty much getting spanked. They only sell 7 million computers a year, after all. Dell sold more than that in just the first quarter, one of the weakest quarters of the year. --Paul

John F. Braun April 20, 2004


Editor's note: Yeah, let's see. In candy-colored computers, Apple has a 96 percent market share. Hey, that's relevant! Verticals are, by definition, niche markets, and not measured by any major market analysts...

Although your measure of the candy-colored vertical market is appreciated, and your understanding of the word "vertical" seems to be correct, I'm curious why you are under the impression that "major market analysts" don't measure verticals. From what I can tell, you consider IDC one of these major analysts, so I made the Herculean effort of trotting over to the IDC site and searching for "vertical computing" reports, and came up with several thousand matches.
As a quick example, one of their recent reports on worldwide IT spending includes such verticals as communication and media, education, government, and consumer/household, areas where I'd bet that Apple has a slightly larger share than the 1.7% that you like to tout. Of course, this report is $15K, so isn't something that your average Joe (or Paul) could spring for. But your assumption that major market analysts somehow ignore verticals is, well, wrong.

Discounting IDC as an information source, one could always do something called "investigative reporting," an activity that a self-styled "journalist" such as yourself should be able to accomplish. Publishing market share? Sales figures from Adobe or Quark would be a good start, or perhaps scanning some of the material over at Seybold. Graphic market share? Adobe figures would also be a good source. I could continue but you get the idea.

As an Apple enthusiast and investor, I don't really care about Apple's overall market share, as long as they are successful in the markets that they participate in. And the fact that they are growing both revenue and income doesn't hurt either.

John F. Braun April 26, 2004


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Battery Life Issues Almost Certainly Not Windows 7's Fault

While Microsoft is still investigating a notebook battery life issue that was supposedly caused by Windows 7, some interesting trends have emerged. ...

Confirmed: Battery Life Issues Not Windows 7's Fault

Microsoft on Monday issued a lengthy statement about the recent Windows 7 battery controversy, echoing my assessment from earlier in the day, but backing it up with hard, cold evidence. ...

Getting your iPhone to Sync with Exchange 2003

Follow these steps to use an iPhone with Exchange. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement