A recent Gartner report corroborates what industry observers have known for months: Microsoft's security initiatives are paying off for the company, and as customers move to more modern Windows versions such as Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, they'll share in the benefits. Gartner, however, hedged its bets by chiding Microsoft for blaming many of its security compromises on people who write malicious code, perhaps in a bid to make its otherwise glowing report on Microsoft security seem less one-sided. The report is also careful to cast Microsoft's security improvements in guarded terms. "The worms in 2003 showed there's a long way to go before Windows is secure, and [they] prompted Microsoft to refocus on improving security," the Gartner report says. "By 2005, Microsoft's server software products will be at or above the industry security average. Progress is further away on the desktop, but the market likely has driven Microsoft to take desktop security more seriously. Given Microsoft's dominance in the desktop market, it should demonstrate its commitment to being a security leader by providing a security update to Windows 2000, even at this late stage of the product's life cycle." Sadly, the last comment betrays a bit of ignorance about Microsoft's security plans. Although the company recently released an XP security rollup and has discussed its high-profile service pack plans for Windows 2003 and XP, Microsoft will also ship major security updates for Win2K in 2004. According to Gartner, by 2005 the "security costs" of Windows-based servers will equal those of UNIX and Linux servers; presumably these costs are higher on Windows today. Most of the improvements will come from customers adopting modern Windows versions, dropping less secure products such as Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 98, as well as from the security-oriented updates Microsoft will ship for Windows 2003, XP, and Win2K this year. In related news, Gartner analysts also issued reports stating that Longhorn will be the likely Windows successor, that Microsoft SQL Server Yukon will be delayed and won't be significantly different from earlier versions, and that Microsoft's Software Assurance (SA) licensing program will be crucial to the company's revenues going forward. Yes, they get paid to write this stuff.
End of Article
Oh, the irony of this story right above one that reads, "Two New MyDoom Variants Launch Attacks".
Really, Paul: How do you write stuff like "A recent Gartner report corroborates what industry observers have known for months: Microsoft's security initiatives are paying off for the software giant" after the worst attack on the Internet in history--one that REQUIRED two pieces of Microsoft Software (Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Outlook) to propagate? Do YOU get paid to write this stuff? My God, you must be laughing all the way to the bank!
My favorite part of this piece is the last paragraph. I've always wondered why more people don't point this out about Gartner. Theirs is a business built on either stating the obvious or completely making stuff up. Read a report where they say something like "there's a 0.45 probability that company x will do activity y in 2007". What a crock.
Joshua Heslinga February 11, 2004
"A recent Gartner report corroborates what industry observers have known for months: Microsoft's security initiatives are paying off for the company, and as customers move to more modern Windows versions such as Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, they'll share in the benefits."
Are they? Their customers aren't noticing. And people should upgrade to get security that they should have had in the first place? Nice one.
"According to Gartner, by 2005 the "security costs" of Windows-based servers will equal those of UNIX and Linux servers; presumably these costs are higher on Windows today."
HANG ON! What about all those reports that said Windows was cheaper. Oh, yer right. They didn't include the cost of ongoing security, did they?
"Most of the improvements will come from customers adopting modern Windows versions, dropping less secure products such as Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 98"
I don't see 98 or NT 4.0 being less secure. The bugs that affect these still afflict 2000 and XP.
"Microsoft's Software Assurance (SA) licensing program will be crucial to the company's revenues going forward."
I think this is a bomb waiting to go off. Never mind.
"Yes, they get paid to write this stuff."
I wish I did.
David February 15, 2004
You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor?
Register now
An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including a shortened work week thanks to the 4th of July, expensive Windows 7 pricing, Bing's modest monthly gains, IE 8 heading to work, Steve Jobs back at Apple, and so much more ...
Get Mark Minasi’s Windows Server 2008 Audio CDs "Windows expert, consultant and best-selling author Mark Minasi shows you if 2008 is right for you and, if so, how to get the most out of it!
Take Control of Your Email Optimize your email storage – Download this white paper to learn key how-to’s in email storage management.
Get Windows IT Pro To Go! The Windows IT Pro Magazine Master CD is a powerful combination of content and convenience. Order now, and save up to 25%--plus you’ll get online access to new articles each and every month! Subscribe today!
Register
Really, Paul: How do you write stuff like "A recent Gartner report corroborates what industry observers have known for months: Microsoft's security initiatives are paying off for the software giant" after the worst attack on the Internet in history--one that REQUIRED two pieces of Microsoft Software (Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Outlook) to propagate? Do YOU get paid to write this stuff? My God, you must be laughing all the way to the bank!
Today's oxymoron: "Microsoft Security"
Wendy Rebecca February 10, 2004