Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


October 30, 2009

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 2, 2009

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!
An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news ...

WinInfo Blog

After a week in New York, I spent this week at home, which was nice. Or, it would have been if I didn't have to deal with the Windows 7 upgrade problems that I discuss below. The whole situation cast a pall over everything. But I'm away again next week—this time to Seattle/Redmond for the SQL PASS conference and some Microsoft meetings.

This past Thursday, Leo and I recorded what might possibly be the longest episode of the Windows Weekly podcast yet. Let's just say I'm not amused by Microsoft's behavior surrounding a certain topic. (Again, see below.)

But wait, there's more. Don't forget to follow me on Twitter, Friendfeed, and the SuperSite Blog.

Short Takes

Microsoft: If You Use Windows 7 Upgrade Media to Do a Clean Install, You Could Be Breaking the Law
As we careened toward the Windows 7 launch last week, the final remaining question about Microsoft's new OS was how the upgrade media would work. Microsoft wasn't saying and wouldn't provide the press with advance copies, so we had to buy it ourselves on launch day and figure it out. What we found wasn't so positive: Microsoft makes it very hard, in many cases, to legitimately use this media to clean install Windows 7 on a PC that previously ran Windows Vista or Windows XP. And when I posted about ways in which you can make this work, Microsoft reacted in a bizarre fashion, noting that a "hack" I wrote about was "not always legal." The problem with that kind of statement is that it implies guilt. And in this case, that quote should actually be rewritten to read that the method I describe is, in fact, "almost always legal" for legitimate Windows users. The concern here is that virtually every single PC user owns a previous version of Windows (Vista or XP) and thus qualifies for any upgrade version of Windows 7 and can install it any way they want, as long as they do so on the PC on which the previous version of Windows was installed and activated. And that is precisely what I documented. You can read about the ensuing mess on the SuperSite Blog. And you can read about how to really install Windows 7 on the SuperSite for Windows. You know, assuming you're legit. Which you almost certainly are. Unlike a certain software giant, I don't presume guilt.

Microsoft: OK, Maybe You're Not a Pirate. Maybe.
After Microsoft's bizarre freakout, IDG News' Gregg Keizer wrote that the company had "backed down" from its previous claims about the upgrade "trick" that I published, saying that "users can apply a workaround trick to do a clean install of Windows 7 on a blank hard drive as long as they toe the licensing line." And although I appreciate Microsoft's implicit mea culpa—"[If] you have the previous version Full Windows license and qualify for the Windows 7 Upgrade, you have the rights to do a 'clean' install," Microsoft's Eric Ligman finally admitted in a contorted way—I have yet to hear directly from the software giant. But I don't need Microsoft's approval, because the details are spelled out quite nicely in the Windows 7 end user license agreement (EULA). "To use upgrade software, you must first be licensed for the software that is eligible for the upgrade." Exactly. And, again, I'd point out that that's exactly what I've been documenting. It's not a "hack" or a "trick." It's called supporting legitimate Microsoft customers. And if you read what I wrote, that's how I describe it: clean-installing Windows 7 over a legitimate, activated version of Vista or XP. It's legal, and it's OK. And Microsoft can't claim otherwise.

If Microsoft Allows OEM Sales to Individuals, Is It Being Hypocritical or Ironic? Or Both?
Of course, there will always be people who pirate Windows. And you could make the argument that some people will use the workarounds I've published to illegally clean-install Windows 7 using less expensive upgrade media rather than paying for more expensive full media. Yes, that possibility exists. Some people will do that. But if someone wants to really save money and bypass Microsoft's licensing issues, he or she can just buy OEM versions of Windows 7 instead. These versions offer the same installation capabilities as the full versions but—get this—they cost less than the upgrade versions. And I'd point out that Microsoft has never once tried to prevent online stores such as NewEgg from selling these OEM Windows versions to individuals. Hypocritical? Ironic? It's probably both. This whole thing is hilarious when you think about it. So let's move on. Because the more I think about it, the less funny it gets.

Apple Ships Apple TV and iTunes Updates, Kills Palm Pre Sync. Again.
Apple shipped very minor revisions to its iTunes (PC, Mac) and Apple TV software this week. But the most notable change comes in iTunes, which has once again been reengineered to prevent Palm Pre users from syncing their devices with their iTunes-based media collections. This is, I think, the third time Apple has updated iTunes to hurt Pre users, which is sort of petty because those people are clearly Apple customers too, what with the iTunes usage and all. At least Microsoft isn't the only company treating its own customers like dirt this week.

Nintendo Wii Sales Fall Off a Cliff. Finally.
I never understand why some products sell well. Case in the point: The Nintendo Wii has been a blockbuster bestseller ever since its release two years ago despite the fact that there's no evidence at all that anyone actually uses these consoles in any meaningful way after buying them. But it seems that reality is finally, if belatedly, catching up with Nintendo. Wii sales nose-dived 43 percent in the first half of the company's fiscal year. It was like the world collectively realized they were just buying a $200 door stop and decided to finally say no to their spoiled inner child. The thing about the Wii is that it was well behind the Xbox 360 and Sony PlayStation 3 when it debuted, and aside from a very small handful of decent games, it's even further behind now. So Nintendo is scaling back its sales projections, which makes sense, and I assume the company is looking at ways to bolster the platform. In the meantime, I still feel that the Xbox 360, especially, is the vastly superior choice, both for video gaming and for general living room entertainment.

With Verizon Droid Comes Android 2.0
Tech bloggers are drooling all over Verizon's upcoming Android-based smart phone, the Droid, and that alone gives me pause: These guys are all about the flavor of the minute, and I suspect they'll forget all about the Droid a day later, just like they did with the Zune HD and every other hi-tech gizmo that shipped this year. But there is one thing that's interesting about the Droid: It will be the first smart phone to ship with Google's second-generation phone software, Android 2.0. This major update includes many new features, the most notable of which might just be free turn-by-turn navigation GPS functionality in Google Maps. This capability can (and does) scare the bejeezus out of dedicated GPS companies such as Garmin and Tom-Tom, not to mention makers of other smart phones, because that kind of functionality comes with a monthly charge everywhere else. I might just have to get a Droid: With Android 2.0, it seems as if Google finally has a credible iPhone competitor. You know, maybe.

Google Limits Call Blocking on Google Voice
This week, Google said that it would limit the number of phone numbers it blocks via Google Voice, answering a key complaint from AT&T, which said Google wasn't adhering to the same rules it must follow. You might recall that Google was blocking certain expensive phone calls to rural areas because the Google Voice service was free and it didn't want to incur massive bills from freeloading customers. AT&T told the FCC, however, that if it had to connect those calls (which, by the way, it passes along the cost of), then so should Google. According to Google, the only calls it's now blocking are those set up for "schemes" to increase phone carrier costs. Google is also calling on the FCC to reform the current phone system.

Back to the Grind ...
OK, I guess that's enough of that. I have a few more Windows 7 upgrade scenarios to work through today. Have a great weekend ...

End of Article



Reader Comments
Last week:

"So, congratulations Microsoft. For the first time in a long time, you got everything right."

This week:

"Microsoft: If you use Windows 7 Upgrade media to do a clean install, you could be breaking the law"

and...

"Microsoft: OK, maybe you're not a pirate. Maybe."



At least Microsoft is consistent.

infiniteloop October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


So, Paul thinks it's wrong for Apple not to allow Palm Pre users access to iTunes.

Hmm, iTunes exists as an accessory to the iPod and iPhone. It is what helps to drive sales of both those devices. Therefore why should Apple allow a competitor access to it's sales driver FOC?

It would be like Microsoft allowing PS3 users access to XBOX services for free.

It is Palm who should be derided for making their customers look like leeches.

infiniteloop October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


So, Paul thinks it's wrong for Apple not to allow Palm Pre users access to iTunes.

Hmm, iTunes exists as an accessory to the iPod and iPhone. It is what helps to drive sales of both those devices. Therefore why should Apple allow a competitor access to it's sales driver FOC?

It would be like Microsoft allowing PS3 users access to XBOX services for free.

It is Palm who should be derided for making their customers look like leeches.

infiniteloop October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Even as what would be called a WinJihadist, I have to disagree with what you are saying concerning Apple. While we can disagree with it, Apple is well within their rights to enforce this, and it is really Palm that is at fault here. I'm surprised that Apple hasn't taken any legal action, since it could almost be construed as reverse engineering, which I'm sure Apple protects well. It's a cat and mouse game that is only hurting Palm users. Perhaps they should license the Zune software.

Regarding the Droid, there a few interesting things that set this one apart, although it is more of a WinMo and BB killer than an iPhone killer, but with "The Network" behind them, I'm sure they will prevent more than a few defections to AT&T. The really interesting thing is the openness that Verizon has provided, and allowed Moto and Google to collaborate and work on a very well thought out device highlighting the Google experience. It does seem like a no holds barred assault with exceptional build quality and very fast. While the Apple apps store is the 800 pound gorilla, the almost guaranteed success of the Droid and other Android devices coming to the countries largest wireless network, the momentum of the Android Marketplace will increase greatly.

The Google navigation app brings up another point. Sounds like a great app, which will be installed on the Droid at release. However, as you have often lamented, this app might be enough to bring some scrutiny towards the "do no evil" company that has quite possibly just signed the death warrant for Garmin, et al.

Dipsh t Admin October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Dip is right, Paul, and you're off the rails for backing Palm on this one.

The USB Implementer's Forum already slapped Palm for their actions (which, of course, you fail to mention in your so-called "news" story):

"I attach for your information the USB-IF’s adopted and published policy regarding Vendor Identification Numbers (VIDs). Under the Policy, Palm may only use the single Vendor ID issued to Palm for Palm’s usage. Usage of any other company’s Vendor ID is specifically precluded. Palm’s expressed intent to use Apple’s VID appears to violate the attached policy."

http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090922/usb-if-slaps-palm/

Palm is wrong. Let me repeat it for you, Paul: PALM IS WRONG. I know you have a deep-seated hatred for Apple, but PALM IS WRONG. Instead of whining about "unfairness", they should be developing their own damn solution and duking it out in the market. Instead, they're resulting to cheap hacks to accomplish what they can't do on their own (and apparently inspiring cheap hacks to defend them).

lotsamystuff October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Apple is not treating its customers like dirt, its Palm treating their customers like dirt for not providing their own software to sync with the Pre.

As pointed out over and over again, Apple uses easy to understand and access XML files to store the playlists and such for syncing. Why can't Palm just release software the uses those files to sync music and videos to the Pre.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1660

yoshipod October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


I have to agree wholeheartely with Paul on the Palm Pre sync to iTunes debacle. How in the hell is allowing Apple customers who are buying iTunes music legally, being prevented from syncing said legally purchased music to their phone or device? Is the Palm Pre or any other smartphone calibre phone impacting iPhone sales? No. Is it hurting the iTunes ecosystem? No. Once I purchase the music, its mine to use with whatever device I choose. If I want to play it on a Zune, a Blackberry, Palm Pre or another phone/device, that's my choice.

This move is just anti-competititve behavior on the part of Apple to protect its music monopoly as the world's number one digital music store. Not everyone is going to buy the iPhone. That is just reality. The fact that Apple has this "our stuff or the hell with you" mentality is no different than the tactics used by Standard Oil against its rivals. Any actions taken by Apple that could hurt its rivals or hurts the consumer is a violation of the Sherman and Clayton anti-trust acts.

Even Microsoft has figure that interoperability and cooperation with rivals is really the best business tactic. Instead of inviting Palm over to Culpertino and hashing out a deal that would allow any third party phone to do sync, they are having this really shallow hack and block duel. It makes Palm in many people eyes look like the hero, because its the only company making a brave stance and stand against Apple's anti-competitive tactics. Infact, I've spoken with quite a number of Pre owners and they bought the phone partially because of Palm's stand against Apple.

I don't understand it at all. Rhapsody/Real Player and WinAmp software allows for iPhone/iPod sync and we haven't seen Apple complain about that.

I just think Apple could do something to protect itself from future anti-trust/anti-competitive behavior suits by opening the platform. The Palm Pre isn't a POS, its a very nice device. It will be interesting when Google challenges Apple.

subzerohitman721 October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


subzero, if you're going to implement USB, you play by the rules. Palm didn't. End of discussion. Take off your WinJihadist blinders and look at the big picture.

lotsamystuff October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


"It will be interesting when Google challenges Apple."

Perhaps more importantly.

It is interesting that Google is challenging Microsoft - and winning.

http://windowsitpro.com/windowspaulthurrott/article/articleid/103051/los-angeles-dumps-microsoft-adopts-google
.html

infiniteloop October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


@subzerohitman:
"I don't understand it at all. Rhapsody/Real Player and WinAmp software allows for iPhone/iPod sync and we haven't seen Apple complain about that."

What is it you don't understand? If Real Player and Winamp software didn't allow syncing with the iPod, there wouldn't be much point to the software as there would be very little left for it to sync with.

infiniteloop October 30, 2009 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Battery Life Issues Almost Certainly Not Windows 7's Fault

While Microsoft is still investigating a notebook battery life issue that was supposedly caused by Windows 7, some interesting trends have emerged. ...

Confirmed: Battery Life Issues Not Windows 7's Fault

Microsoft on Monday issued a lengthy statement about the recent Windows 7 battery controversy, echoing my assessment from earlier in the day, but backing it up with hard, cold evidence. Put simply, Windows 7 is not responsible for any battery life issues ...

Getting your iPhone to Sync with Exchange 2003

Follow these steps to use an iPhone with Exchange. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement