Windows Upgrades Take a Back Seat

Here's a comforting thought if you're mired in the hell of constant Windows upgrades: Microsoft will likely significantly delay the next two OS generations (Windows .NET Server—formerly code-named "Whistler"—and Windows "Longhorn"). The company plans to delay the releases, in part because of its recently announced, highly publicized security code review. Microsoft's sudden focus on "Trustworthy Computing" has halted all new coding for 1 month so that the company's programmers can review code to look for security and privacy vulnerabilities. The code review has also forced the company to reevaluate schedules and push back release dates. I doubt .NET Server will ship until late 2002 or even early 2003. Did I just hear a collective sigh of relief?

Windows upgrades are sometimes a necessary evil and, if you sign on to Microsoft's License 6.0 scheme, upgrades might soon become a regularly scheduled event (excuse me, subscription service). .NET Server is such a minor upgrade that you'll be able to implement and integrate it into Win2K environments more easily than you could integrate previous OS versions. But after the challenging upgrade to Windows 2000 and, for some enterprises, Active Directory (AD), most of us could use a break. The delay of .NET Server might give administrators a 2-year pause between server releases, which is still too short in my opinion.

Windows Longhorn, the client and server OS that will follow .NET Server, is even more interesting than its predecessors. Although most Longhorn server-specific features remain a mystery, many of the release's client features are important to the enterprise. Chief among these features is a new SQL Server-based file system called the Universal Data Store (formerly code-named Storage+). The store will obscure the physical location of files and folders and present a simpler, more logical way to store user data. According to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, you shouldn't think of the store as a file system anymore: It's just a data bucket.

Longhorn users will be able to use XML-based SQL queries to search for data. And they'll be able to send search requests remotely, giving this technology many benefits beyond the desktop. Microsoft is working to consolidate its data stores using the next generation of SQL Server, code-named Yukon. Longhorn and the next generation of Microsoft Exchange Server and AD will be based on the Yukon data store, so administrators and users will be able to query these disparate data sources at the same time. Currently, the Windows file system, AD store, Exchange Server mailboxes, and SQL Server databases are separate data buckets: Although custom solutions exist for aggregating searches of these stores, this functionality will soon be a feature of the OS.

However, the inclusion of Yukon technology in Longhorn will delay the OS's release until late 2003 or early 2004; it was originally expected in late 2002 or early 2003. I doubt that this delay will cause much grumbling among most Microsoft customers, although the company might have to release an interim Windows XP Home upgrade to appease consumers who expect a new Windows version each year. For the rest of us, however, a new Windows version isn't always welcome, so enjoy the much-needed break between upgrades. I know I will.

Discuss this Article 5

stef (not verified)
on Feb 19, 2002
It's the right time that MS looks into security a)bigger demand for security, even from joe public b)corporations do not upgrade as fast as in the past c)innovation rate is slower now that a few years back leading to b) d)it's one of the major weaknesses of windows e)now that windows scales (up to 32 CPU) security is the one issue which could prevent MS competing against the Unix/Java camp in the enterprise market
David Spake (not verified)
on Feb 13, 2002
They present this one month as some laudable time frame, while I feel it is only laughable. With all the products they have to reveiw, and the millions upon millions of lines of interconnected code this time frame would only appear to be the beginning of what is necessary.
Pat Telford (not verified)
on Feb 17, 2002
I don't think that there are many companies that would laugh at having thousands of their developers spend a month of analysis solely on security. In the case of MS, this is likely to total over 600 man-years of effort. If this isn't laudable, you must be hard to impress.

Please or Register to post comments.

Upcoming Training

Mastering System Center 2012

During over 6 hours of training you can join John Savill from your computer as he will walk you through the key components and capabilities of System Center 2012, what’s involved in using the components, and the benefit they can bring to your environment.

Register Now

Current Issue

May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.

CURRENT ISSUE / ARCHIVE / SUBSCRIBE

Windows Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the Windows Community in our Forums.