Scroogled 2: Microsoft Again Takes on Gmail Privacy

Microsoft this week launched a second major attack on Gmail, with a new Scroogled campaign aimed at highlighting the privacy issues with Google’s web-based email service. As with the previous Scroogled campaign, which focused on a bogus Google shopping site that was just a front-end for paid advertising, the new campaign shows how Google funnels everything it does through its Matrix-like ad network.

Related: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo!, Others Partner on Email Security

“Google goes through every Gmail that’s sent or received, looking for keywords so they can target Gmail users with paid ads,” Microsoft’s Scroogled website notes. “And there’s no way to opt out of this invasion of your privacy.”

Microsoft, of course, has a solution: Its Gmail alternative, the awkwardly named Outlook.com, doesn’t sift through your email to send you targeted and often creepy advertising.

“For example, if you write a friend to let her know you are separating from your husband, Google sells ads against this information to divorce lawyers, who post ads alongside it,” Microsoft’s Stefan Weitz told ZDNet. “Or if you ask a friend for vacation suggestions, Google uses this information to target you with ads from travel agencies or airlines that want your business.”

Microsoft’s strategy of highlighting Google’s ad network is a good one. Though many mistakenly think of Google as a technology or web services firm, the reality is that it’s just a giant advertising firm that provides other products and services solely to feed this one economic engine. So while you might imagine Android, Gmail, and Google Search as primary Google platforms, that’s all just a front for Google’s one real business: selling ads. In its recent annual financial disclosures, Google revealed that exactly 95 percent of its revenues came from advertising in calendar year 2012.

Google, of course, sticks to the “Don’t be evil” mantra that former Apple CEO Steve Jobs infamously once referred to as “a load of crap.”

“Advertising keeps Google and many of the websites and services Google offers free of charge,” a Google spokesperson explained. “We work hard to make sure that ads are safe, unobtrusive, and relevant.” And besides, it’s not like human beings are sifting through your email: Google says that’s done by “an automated algorithm” that’s similar to the spam filtering used by other services, including Microsoft’s Outlook.com. Of course, in this case, Microsoft’s automated algorithms are working for you, while Google’s are working for Google.

That said, there is one uncomfortable truth that Microsoft needs to address: The ads users do see in Outlook.com are tailored, in part, from Bing searches and information the user provided at sign-up. (Individuals can at least pay to remove ads from Outlook.com.)

Microsoft had previously attacked Gmail with a similarly themed campaign called Gmail Man. As with the two more recent Scroogled campaigns, Gmail Man is effective because the underlying allegations are true.

Learn more: Microsoft's Gmail Man Spoof Gets It Right

Discuss this Article 11

LemonSaucy
on Feb 7, 2013
I want to add: a good hosts file can block a lot of tracking and most ads. I've been using one for years. Site link: http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm Direct link: http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.txt NOTE: direct link file must be renamed from hosts.txt to hosts (no file extension) and placed in the: C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\ folder.
LemonSaucy
on Feb 7, 2013
People have been warned about Google for some time now. It's hard to get out of the habit of using Google, but it is possible! I deliberately do some of my searching with Bing, insterad of Google. The results are good. I also do no use most Google services, with the majjor exception of YouTube. I read a book about Google and how it threatend one's personal integrity and privacy and so on .. even if you do not use any Google service! "Googling Security: How Much Does Google Know About You?" by Greg Conti. It goes beyond Orwellian what Google is up to. They didn't hire 700 psychotherapists and psychologists for no reason. At this point there's no complete opt out. Google can make profiles of people who never even go online simply by scanning what other people put on line about them. Nevertheless, the less one uses their services and if one operates with reasonable constraint, they are limited ... which is probably a good thing as Google is no longer, ah, equitable (?).
andrewtechhelp
on Feb 7, 2013
Microsoft has apparently told The Verge that they DON'T read the subject lines of Outlook.com email to display ads. http://theverge.com/2013/2/7/3962794/microsoft-revives-anti-google-scroogled-campaign-to-attack-gmail Apparently the Wall St Journal was wrong with that claim.
paul14110
on Feb 7, 2013
The big question in the end is this.. How many people will even know about this campaign? Did the last campaign have any impact? Nobody even knows that it happened and that makes this whole thing irrelevant. Microsoft needs to learn how to grab everyones attention and keep it just like Apple has.
abw1987
on Feb 7, 2013
I don't get all the fear about the big evil Google overlord. It's not as if humans are sifting through our emails. It's just machines sifting through unfathomable amounts of data to target ads based on an algorithm. I don't see this as a privacy issue. Good on Microsoft for fighting back, but I think they chose the wrong battle for this ad.
Ianray
on Feb 7, 2013
I preferred the social media advertising Microsoft did with the twitter campaign to have people talk about reasons they like Office 365 or what they are using Office 365 for. Informational, positive social media campaigns are a great way to reach a core target audience who might be swayed by meaningful promotional information to buy products. I also liked "I'm a PC" as the Mac commercials seemed snarky while Microsoft had the appearance of being the reasonable competitor. I even liked Tom Rizzo's slightly-negative Sharepoint marketing as at least it was accurately targeting a subgroup of potential customers would understand and make actual purchasing decisions based on the content. In contrast, this campaign seems like sour grapes. If Microsoft didn't want to up their ad delivery game, why did they acquire aQuantive? Microsoft has been chasing Google for brand loyalty on search for years with no market share gains other than when they cancelled MSN and gained that share back with Bing. Also, the campaign is as out of touch as using "Moonlighting" or Jerry Seinfeld to advertise to a contemporary audience. This campaign even used an old-school phone survey to ask people how they felt about privacy and free email. This kind of survey seems like it would query the least representative group concerning privacy and web technology customers: people with home phones who pick up for strangers and answer questions.
LemonSaucy
on Feb 8, 2013
@Roncerr Thanks for the reply. I'm not afraid of Google either, but I've become a bit wary. I definitely often search via other engines. I don't use Picasa, 'wouldn't dream of the cloud for my business documents, and certainly don't use the spyware package called Chrome Browser. Anyway, I'm carrying on and Greg Conti has written an excellent book, one that's food for thought. And yes, the Microsoft MVP's hosts file works really well.
Oleg R (not verified)
on Feb 8, 2013
I can't believe you're not incensed by this. Issues regarding Google's privacy policy may be interesting and merit discussion, but why on earth is MS taking it upon itself to lead this debate. Last I read, MS claimed to be in the "devices and services" business, or was moving towards this. It is not in the public service announcement business (and it shouldn't be). What could MS possibly hope to gain by this campaign? It appears to be spending a not insubstantial amount of money on it, too. If I were a shareholder, I'd be furious that even a penny of the company's money was being flushed down the toilet in this way. MS has some good and even some great products that are failing probably only for want of decent, or sufficient, marketing efforts. I'm not an MS shareholder, but as perhaps Canada's only owner of a Windows Phone 8, I find it depressing in the extreme that MS is channeling its efforts (and cash) into this rather than towards raising the public profile of Windows Phone 8. Windows Phones are great devices (mine's a 920). It is tragic shame that attempting to entice consumers to actually buy them is, apparently, not a corporate priority. Unlike Google and Android, MS actually gets money from the sale of Windows Phones. Or, rather, it would get money if any were actually sold to consumers. It's ironic that the CEO's background is in sales, since sales and marketing seem to be MS's biggest dysfunction. As to it being true, I'm not sure that's necessarily a criticism of Google. It's more in the category of "yes, but so what." I recall your very insightful point on What the Tech about how Google Now was a fascinating development because of its ability to seemingly anticipate needs. It thus functions like a rudimentary AI., which is very cool indeed Interesting, too, is that this technology will only work (or, rather, will only improve) as more of our personal information get's pumped through Google's algorithms.
gfrancis@alscar...
on Feb 7, 2013
I find the whole ad thing interesting. I do both work and personal searches and purchasing on my home computer and I end up with very interesting ads all over the place including Facebook and Yahoo. It is a little disconcerting sometimes but I prefer it over all of the singles ads that show up on web sites all of the time which has zero relevance to me.
roncerr
on Feb 7, 2013
Thanks, Lemon; well stated; HOSTS is just that simple. (Believe it or not, some fourms would delete your post with the winhelp link and threaten to ban you.) Personally I'm not afraid of Google in particular, just annoyed by targeted ads. A combination of the hosts file and a free email client (Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail) makes the world a beautiful place.
Waethorn
on Feb 7, 2013
Advertising keeps Google and many of the websites and services Google offers free of charge, So does using other peoples open source software while integrating their spyware back into the Linux kernel by way of Android integration.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• The Microsoft
Technology Roadmap
• Office 365 Implementation
• Hyper-V Optimizing
• Windows 8 Deployment
and much more!

Come See Paul Thurrott & Rod Trent in Person!

Early Registration Now Open

Upcoming Training

Mastering SharePoint 2013: Succeeding, Not Just Surviving

Building on the success of the “Mastering SharePoint 2010” seminars, the presenters have updated the content to cover the latest and greatest SharePoint product: SharePoint 2013. While SharePoint 2013 is relatively new on the marketplace, the presenters have been working with SharePoint 2013 for well over a year, and have implemented it with a number of clients in production environments.

Register Now

Current Issue

May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.

CURRENT ISSUE / ARCHIVE / SUBSCRIBE

Windows Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the Windows Community in our Forums.