Paul Otellini to Step Down as Intel Chief

Intel CEO Paul Otellini unexpectedly revealed that he intends to step down from the company and retire in May 2013. The Intel board had expected Otellini to remain as CEO until he reached age 65 and only “reluctantly” accepted his resignation. Otellini is 62.

No reason was given for Otellini’s early departure, beyond the fact that it was initiated by the CEO. Otellini has been with Intel for 40 years and will have been CEO for 8 years when he does retire.

"After almost four decades with the company and eight years as CEO, it’s time to move on and transfer Intel’s helm to a new generation of leadership," Mr. Otellini said. "I look forward to working with [Intel board chairman] Andy [Bryant], the board, and the management team during the six-month transition period, and to being available as an advisor to management after retiring as CEO."

Otellini presided over an important era for Intel, during which it essentially vanquished its only major foe in the market for desktop and server chips, and helped Apple make the transition from the rival PowerPC platform. But Otellini was slow to embrace the mobile computing wave that is sweeping the industry, and the firm's chips for mobile devices have fallen behind rival designs based on ARM. This is doubly troubling given the sales slowdown in the PC industry.

Like earlier Intel CEOs, Otellini was promoted from within, though he wasn't an engineer like Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Andy Grove. But Intel is now expected to at least consider an outsider for the CEO role—a move that would be a first for the company.

Intel reported that it generated $107 billion in cash from operations and made $23.5 billion in dividend payments during Otellini's tenure as CEO so far. Intel currently enjoys 83 percent market share in the PC market.

(Read about Otellini's criticism of Windows 8 here.)

Discuss this Article 2

eboyhan
on Nov 20, 2012
It seems to me that Intel has always been perceived as slow to respond to competition. Remember Netburst before Core? AMD was killing Intel against the Netburst architecture back then. Intel kept on doing what it does best: turning the screws ever tighter on the manufacturing side. The extra transistors thus created, enabled the whole multi-core turnabout and ultimately led to Core, and the decline of AMD's fortunes. I don't see anything different now: Intel is already a generation and a half ahead of its foundry competitors. Intel is readying 14nm for late next year, and already has 10nm working in the lab. The best that competitive foundries can achieve is 28nm. Ivy Bridge and Haswell are adding performance at the high end while reducing power consumption. The Clover Trail Atoms already appear competitive on the power front with ARM, and as you yourself mentioned Clover Trail seems to do this while delivering better than Arm performance. When Atom moves to 20nm next year (BayTrail) both performance AND power consumption will probably exceed what ARM can deliver. So they are working methodically as always to confront new challenges. They already have competitive products, and next year's product lineup looks to be superior to anything from ARM -- the rest is marketing and sales to get some high profile design wins going forward. Intel may decide that someone good at that should be their next CEO.

Please or Register to post comments.

Upcoming Training

Mastering System Center 2012

During over 6 hours of training you can join John Savill from your computer as he will walk you through the key components and capabilities of System Center 2012, what’s involved in using the components, and the benefit they can bring to your environment.

Register Now

Current Issue

May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.

CURRENT ISSUE / ARCHIVE / SUBSCRIBE

Windows Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the Windows Community in our Forums.