Consumer Reports: Verizon Version of iPhone 4 Is Also Flawed

In July 2010, Consumer Reports caused waves by confirming that the then-new iPhone 4 suffered from a serious hardware defect, refuting Apple's claims that the device behaved similarly to the competition. This week, the consumer-advocacy group released the results of similar testing with the iPhone for Verizon. And there's bad news, Apple fans: According to Consumer Reports, this version of the iPhone is just as flawed as the original.

"The Verizon iPhone 4 has a problem that could cause the phone to drop calls, or be unable to place calls, in weak signal conditions," Consumer Reports noted in a blog post announcing its findings. "The problem is similar to the one we confirmed in July with the AT&T version of Apple's newest smartphone. It can occur when you hold either version of the phone in a specific but quite natural way in which a gap in the phone's external casing is covered."

Responding to Apple claims that competing smartphones had similar attenuation issues, Consumer Reports also tested whether several other highly rated devices—the Samsung Fascinate, Motorola Droid 2 Global, HTC Droid Incredible, LG Ally, and Motorola Droid X—suffered from the same bad design as the iPhone 4. None did.

"The only phone in which the finger contact caused any meaningful decline in performance was the iPhone 4," Consumer Reports said. "Putting a finger across one particular gap \\[on the iPhone 4\\] caused performance to decline. Bridging this gap is easy to do inadvertently, especially when the phone is in your palm, which might readily and continuously cover the gap during a call."

The problem with the iPhone 4 is so serious, the group said, that simply proceeding with a phone call would cause that call to drop over time. These tests were repeated under a variety of conditions and in each case, only the iPhone 4 lost its signal and dropped calls. For this reason, Consumer Reports refuses to recommend the Verizon iPhone 4, just as it did with the AT&T version. The group also called Apple to task for not formally admitting to the problem and for providing a stop-gap fix (literally, in the form of a "bumper" case that covers the external antenna) for only a limited time last year.

Tear-downs of the Verizon iPhone show that Apple, despite its protestations, actually did work to overcome the attenuation issues in the device when it was reconfigured slightly for Verizon. These efforts were clearly unsuccessful. But as was noted last summer, other more experienced phone makers learned years ago not to put antennas on the outside of devices, where attenuation can cause signal drops and dropped calls. This is a lesson Apple—which strongly favors design over function—had to learn belatedly, and the hard way.

Discuss this Article 13

dcortex
on Feb 28, 2011
If you use your $200.00 iPhone without a case,
you deserve dropped calls.
What idiot would operated a naked iPhone?...oh Paul!
Protect your investment with a case... and presto..no dropped calls!
Idjiots!
SkolVikings
on Feb 28, 2011
@Jones & @JayZeee74,
My first thought when reading this was that Paul was a few days late. The Consumer Report review of the Verizon iPhone 4 hit the blogosphere late last week, and is was covered by many of the tech blogs I follow (some of which are Apple friendly).

So it's not just Paul reporting on this. Many other tech blogs and magazines have already covered it (e.g. Neowin, Mashable, Lifehacker, Wired.com , PocketNow, and of course Consumer Reports, etc).
Christopher
on Feb 28, 2011
"The only voice I hear is Pauls, droning on endlessly about how the iPhone is flawed."

And Consumer Reports, ARS Technica, Anandtech, etc.

You know, extremely read hardware sites that have more credibility than you will ever have since we just seem up to our eyes in anonymous Apple apologists.

CR does have a point. No other hardware maker puts their antennas outside. It's just simple physics. However when the iPhone 5 comes out without an external antenna, I'll start to laugh because then you guys will make up some other excuse.

In fairness to Apple, I do believe the Verizon model placed the gap in a less likely location (well, for how I grip my phone).

"Oh, wait, my WP7 Samsung Focus is bricked...."

Yeah, that was stupid on MS's part. However, because they are nicer than Apple they offered refunds or free new phones and admitted their problem. To the best of my knowledge Apple has never admitted for screwing anything up... Which is truly amazing since no company goes 30 years with a 100% batting average. Yeah, companies normally give out free cases for a limited time because of the goodness of their hearts.

I have no idea where their huge ego stems from, but they need to dump it.

More frustrating are the hardware failures. I've had friends who bricked iPhones, DVRs, MP3 players, PS3s, Xboxes. I think it would be good manufacturing standards if they included the original OS image on board which was automatically reloaded whenever the primary boot-loader failed. It really isn't that costly when dealing with embedded OSs.
guruguru
on Mar 2, 2011
snow leopard is apple's vista, and the iphone 4 is apple's kin. apple will no doubt want to ditch the flawed design of the iphone 4 asap. lesson learned for steve jobs I guess. iphone 5 should also be the last jobs influenced iphone which is good news for everybody who wants a back button on their iphone.
nim55
on Feb 28, 2011
Wow, "BL", great story! Now we just have to wait for droves and droves of people to turn in their iPhones and buy WP7 phones instead. Oh, wait, my WP7 Samsung Focus is bricked....
subzerohitman721
on Feb 28, 2011
So people are bashing Paul over a story written by Consumer Reports? A story in which Consumer Reports professionally tested the iPhone 4 against all other Verizon phones & yet only the iPhone 4 is the ONLY phone that has signal attenuation issues?

I believe the phrase goes, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

For those people in poor Verizon areas, this story has a TON of relevance. I find it funny that Paul on this website, on Windows Weekly & on TWiG occasionally, Paul has criticized Microsoft many times, praised Apple many times, & yet the same old people call him everything from a shill to a D-list blogger?

Can't you guys come up with an original insult. This was the same garbage said 10 years ago. Where's the A-list material? Paul, you should be insulted for their lack of originality.

Is it really Paul Thurrot's fault the iPhone 4 failed Consumer Reports test? Did he make the iPhone 4? Or should you people really be mad at Apple for hocking defective hardware & charging premium price tag? Why should anyone have to buy extra piece of plastic to make hardware work out of the box as intended? That's the real crime here.
JayZeee74
on Feb 28, 2011
I just fail to see this as a wide spread problem. I've owned the phone since launch and dropped one call. One. That's it in almost a year. Also why isn't there widespread returns? The only voice I hear is Pauls, droning on endlessly about how the iPhone is flawed.

Perhaps the attenuation is a flaw, but the degree of it is so minimal that it just isn't newsworthy anymore.
mbedan
on Feb 28, 2011
"It's an important part of Paul's self image to belittle anything Apple does, denigrate every success, exaggerate every problem."

The above statement is false. Paul spends a lot of time praising Apple. Paul also spends a huge amount of time criticizing MS. I do think Paul can be rather snarky with his Apple criticisms.

I think his main beef is that many media outlets think Apple (Steve Jobs) walks on water by selling us magic (okay "magical" devices). I rather agree with him in that many media types pile on overly sympathetic praise in their reviews and comments while ignoring (most of) the negative issues. Basically, a negative issue is something Apple will address in some later release; while any negative issue re: or other products (not just MS) are just proof that you should never, ever by non-Apple products.

BTW, I use Windows-based computers at home and at work. I use an iPhone (3GS) and an iPad. I also have a Zune HD. And they ALL are a bunch of expensive crap...
SPiotr
on Feb 28, 2011
http://www.mobileworldcongress.com/awards/global_mobile_awards.htm

Best Mobile Device:Apple - iPhone 4

Also: Best selling single 'smart' phone since it's launch last summer.

Who are you going to believe?
Webdev511
on Feb 28, 2011
Design is more important than function? Ain't that the truth. Was sitting next to a person on the train that was trying to talk to their child only to drop the call three times in less than 10 minutes. They may not have been able to talk to their kid, but their iPhone sure did look nice.
dcortex
on Feb 28, 2011
If you use your $200.00 iPhone without a case,
you deserve dropped calls.
What idiot would operated a naked iPhone?...oh Paul!
Protect your investment with a case... and presto..no dropped calls!
Idjiots!
jersey72
on Mar 1, 2011
@Cortex:

"Protect your investment with a case... and presto..no dropped calls! Idjiots!"

Alas when I bought mine the iSalesPerson told me I didn't need a case.

He an idiot?
chuckb84
on Feb 28, 2011
"The only voice I hear is Pauls, droning on endlessly about how the iPhone is flawed."

And that's all you will hear. It's an important part of Paul's self image to belittle anything Apple does, denigrate every success, exaggerate every problem. Of course, this is becoming increasingly difficult given the success of the company, especially the iOS devices, including the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad. (Remember the iPad assessment of "iDud" before the keynote was even over?)

But, this is all okay, and expected from Paul. He'd rather be reduced to an increasingly shrill, disconnected D-list blogger than ever change his views about Apple.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• The Microsoft
Technology Roadmap
• Office 365 Implementation
• Hyper-V Optimizing
• Windows 8 Deployment
and much more!

Come See Paul Thurrott & Rod Trent in Person!

Early Registration Now Open

Upcoming Training

Mastering System Center 2012

During over 6 hours of training you can join John Savill from your computer as he will walk you through the key components and capabilities of System Center 2012, what’s involved in using the components, and the benefit they can bring to your environment.

Register Now

Current Issue

May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.

CURRENT ISSUE / ARCHIVE / SUBSCRIBE

Windows Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the Windows Community in our Forums.