Within 2 years, low-end digital cameras will be a thing of the past, according to a new ABI Research study. The quality of cameras on mobile phones continues to improve, with a 1.3-megapixel camera to be the norm on most phones by early next year. And phone-based cameras are expected to increase to 2, 3, and even 4 megapixels in the next few years, negating the need for most consumers to buy low-end standalone digital cameras. These improvements continue the trend of adding features to phones that replace many other devices, including PDAs, music players, and even laptops. Factors that are expected to influence the growth of the camera-phone market include increased storage capacity, multimedia message interoperability among cell phone providers, and better picture-management software. Meanwhile, sales of standalone digital camera sales have slowed down. In the first half of this year in the United States, sales grew 20 percent, compared with 50 percent in the same period in 2004.
Who are you kidding? The American carriers charge for everything. "You don't have to accept anything from those crappy American mobile operators." And how is that? By not having a phone at all? I'm happy for you that you get everything for free. We don't. That was my point.
This is good news, except for one thing. The greedy mobile phone companies go OUT OF THEIR WAY to make sure that the photos you take on your phone can only be moved off the handset through THEM for a FEE. They view the cameras as a "profit center", just as they do ring tones. My current phone is a VX-6100 and I was specificially told by several Verizon representitves that there was "no way" to get the pictures off the phone other than through them ("over the air") at either 25 cents per pic, or unlimited via a $5/month plan. "No, you can't use the data cable for that." Well, they were full of "it" because you CAN move the pictures off the phone through the data cable using an open source program (BITPIM). In fact, you can also upload photos TO the phone (wallpaper) and upload ring tones. Of course this also shoots a hole in their billion dollar ring tone market at $2 a tone (who pays for this? answer: everyone). Expect the newer hi-res phones to be the same way. It will be up to smart programmers to figure out that the phone company is not required to get at the pictures. The mobile phone companies suck.
Nokia N90 already sports 2 megapixels camera module with improved Carl Zeiss optics. It's not a cheap digi cam quality yet but we're getting towards the goal by manufacturers also focusing on optics, not only megapixels.
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n90-review-44.p
hp
To previous poster.
Mobile phone companies don't generally suck, but yours seems to.
If you have to pay for getting your pics off the phone, please go get another provider for God's sake!
No one in this world pays for getting pictures out of phone! Expect Americans? But the state of American mobile phone market is a joke anyway, so you can expect anything...
Elsewhere, people just use bluetooth on their phone or cable to down/upload images and similar content.
You don't have to accept anything from those crappy American mobile operators.
You'll have the opportunity to experience: • The Microsoft Technology Roadmap • Office 365 Implementation • Hyper-V Optimizing • Windows 8 Deployment and much more!
During over 6 hours of training you can join John Savill from your computer as he will walk you through the key components and capabilities of System Center 2012, what’s involved in using the components, and the benefit they can bring to your environment.
May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.