Update causes Outlook 2013 to fail to open archive mailboxes

Being a very diligent updater to all things new, I applied the set of updates issued by Microsoft yesterday. All seemed well, but what I didn't know was that a problem lurked in the undergrowth and caused Outlook 2013 to not be able to open archive mailboxes. Not that I go near the archive often, but the problem really does exist and can be solved by removing the KB2881011 update from your PC. Another testing triumph on the road to solid code!

I don’t tend to pay much attention to my archive mailbox. It sits there in the list of resources opened by Outlook but I never really feel the need to go and check that the Managed Folder Assistant (MFA) is moving items to the archive in accordance with my retention policy. It just happens, and like most users, I just let it happen and forget all about the items that accumulate in those archive folders.

That is, until someone posts a note to say that Outlook 2013 fails to open the archive after an update is applied, which is what happened today when Jim Collins noted in the unofficial Exchange 2013 Facebook group (and, I think, in a TechNet forum) that he had very diligently applied all of the updates issued by Microsoft on Patch Tuesday and then found that Outlook stubbornly refused to open his archive mailbox. The not-very-informative error message is shown below. 

Hmmm… my interest in the archive reawakened, I checked and discovered that the same problem existed in my environment (Outlook 2013 installed from the msi package as part of Office 2013 Pro 64-bit running on Windows 8.1 Pro) after I applied all of the 34 available updates suggested to me by Windows Update. In my case, the version reported by Outlook 2013 is 15.0.4641.1001. The click-to-run version of Outlook 2013 exhibits the same problem. 

The original report noted that the issue occurred with an on-premises deployment running Exchange 2013 CU5 (SP1 is also suspected but I haven't confirmed this); I reproduced the problem with Office 365. All other resources, including some site and shared mailboxes, opened normally.  In both instances, Outlook Web App was happy to open the archive, suggesting that something weird was happening inside Outlook.

Through trial and error (otherwise known as careful testing), Jim identified that the problem child in the set of updates is KB2881011. After this update is removed and you reboot the PC, Outlook 2013 is happy once more and will cheerfully connect to its archive mailbox.

I have not tested against other environments. According to MVP Jason Sherry, the problem is not seen when running Outlook 2013 against Exchange 2010. Because of the variations observed here between on-premises and cloud, click-to-run and other varients, it's wise to test your own environment, just to be sure. A Microsoft contact tells me that the problem can be reproduced using RPC/HTTP connections but that MAPI over HTTP links seem to work correctly. Interesting though this is, it's not really a workaround because on-premises deployments can't simply switchover to MAPI over HTTP connections without a lot of planning and Office 365 tenants don't get to vote when they switch.

Microsoft has updated KB2881011 to say that they have removed the update. Only they haven't, as Windows Update on my PC discovered last night when it downloaded the change and applied it. A reboot this morning (August 14) (someone has to test these things) revealed that archive access had once again been removed. Oh well, I guess it is one thing to say that you have removed an update, quite another to make sure that it actually happens.

Oddly, KB2881011 reports that the update only addresses the fact that some holidays have incorrect dates and inaccurate translations and should only affect these language versions; Hebrew, German, French, Dutch, Russian, Spanish, Brazilian, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Italian, Turkish, and Slovak. All I can say is that the update did a fine job of messing up my English-language version of Outlook. The other thought that comes into my mind is why the update was applied to my PC at all... surely it should have only updated PCs running the relevant language versions of Office 2013? Perhaps the fact that I am currently on vacation in France and French is in the list of affected languages prompted Windows Update to apply the change. Who knows!

I have no idea why this irritating problem happened, but it is just that - irritating. And unless you took the time to carefully test every client update for all functions, it's a problem that you could have easily missed and allowed users to install, with all of the attendant woes that could then ensue. It seems like this is yet another snafu that has snuck through Microsoft's fabled automated test harness. It certainly seems like the testing plan should have covered archive access.

I haven't noticed any other problems with the updates distributed yesterday. Then again, one of them might be lurking in a deep, dark part of Outlook waiting to bite me. In the interim, do yourself a favor and test before letting users have the new code. You know it makes sense.

Follow Tony @12Knocksinna

Update: If you use the click-to-run version of Outlook 2013, the command to reverse the change and get to a version that can access archive mailboes is

Officec2rclient.exe /update user updatetoversion=15.0.4631.1002

Update 2 (August 20): Microsoft has released KB2889859 to fix the problem. You can download the 89MB patch and install it to fix the problem, which also apparently affects Outlook's Business Contact Manager (BCM). Despite what KB2889859 says, you will need to reboot your PC after the update finishes.

Discuss this Blog Entry 5

on Aug 13, 2014

Just confirmed issue exists with Click-to-run Outlook x64 version 15.0.4641.1002.

Does NOT affect 2010 based mailboxes, primary & archive on 2010, I also confirmed that.

I've also blogged about it here to raise awareness:
http://blog.jasonsherry.net/2014/08/13/windows-update-kb2881011-breaks-outlook-2013-access-to-archived-mailboxes/

on Aug 13, 2014

Apply patches is more dangerous than hackers. You apply patches and is shure that you break something, if you wait for the hack maybe never happen. I prefer not to patch anything unless theres a security issue, is just painful every time a patch is released something breaks.

on Aug 13, 2014

I disagree. It is true that applying patches without testing is a recipe for disaster simply because a patch might conflict with some aspect of your environment. Finding out that this is the case when software goes bad is a bad thing. But I don't have a problem with the idea that patching after testing is a good thing to do. I would prefer to run software that has known bugs fixed in it rather than to encounter each of the bugs in my own sweet time. Again, testing is important. Test, test, and test before deployment.

on Aug 13, 2014

Just a note to mention that you have an extra 0 in the KB number mentioned in the article.

Also, upon visiting the KB, there's now a note acknowledging the problem and mentioning that it was pulled. And to think that this update merely pertained to non-U.S. holidays, which sounds incredibly minor. It does beg the question as to why it was offered to users outside of those countries.

on Aug 13, 2014

Sorry about the extra zero. That's the nature of trying to report stuff as it develops. Information has been appearing on a drip feed today but I now know that Microsoft has some escalation engineers engaged on debugging the problem and to understand why it happened. I guess Outlook is an international code base and stuff that gets added to it is shared by all, whether we like it or not. That makes sense when you think about it as otherwise the provision of multiple country or locale-specific versions would be a support nightmare.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Tony Redmond's Exchange Unwashed Blog?

On-premises and cloud-based Microsoft Exchange Server and all the associated technology that runs alongside Microsoft's enterprise messaging server.

Contributors

Tony Redmond

Tony Redmond is a senior contributing editor for Windows IT Pro and the author of Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Inside Out (Microsoft Press) and Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Inside Out: Mailbox...
Blog Archive

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×