Microsoft has informed its hardware and wireless carrier partners that it has delayed the release of Windows Mobile 7, the upcoming major update to its smart phone platform. The delay suggests that warring parties inside of Microsoft continue to disagree about the future of the system: Some believe that the company needs to start over from scratch with a more modern and modular platform, while others think the current platform can be melded to meet the needs of the market.
Whatever happens, this is a tough time to delay a next-generation smart phone platform, a situation that ailing Palm knows all too well. With Blackberry stealing away corporate customers, Apple opening up the consumer smart phone market with its innovative iPhone, and Google entering the market with its first Android phone, Microsoft is in a suddenly tenuous position. The current version of Windows Mobile is generally workmanlike and usable, but it's derided by technology enthusiasts for being staid and uninteresting.
Officially, Windows Mobile 7 has been delayed from the first half of 2009 to the second half 2009, but real world time-to-market is always further lengthened by Microsoft's mobile carrier and hardware partners, who typically add another 6 to 12 months to the schedule. And while the company doesn't plan an interim release of the OS before then, it will ship a new version of its Mobile IE browser that includes the rendering engine from the desktop PC version of IE 6. That browser is expected to make Windows Mobile phones more competitive with the iPhone's Safari browser.
Unofficially, however, the picture is more dramatic. Sources tell me that unnamed high-placed Microsoft engineers have been pushing Microsoft to abandon the current Windows Mobile codebase and replace it with something more elegant. Senior Microsoft executives, including Windows chief Steven Sinofsky, have allegedly rejected that idea.
Regardless of any internal struggles, one might argue that a late 2009 delivery of Windows Mobile to handset makers, and a subsequent first half of 2010 release to end users, puts Windows Mobile 7 firmly on track to ship alongside Windows 7. And there is certainly some symmetry to that.
Oh, yeah. We all know how important symmetry is.
It doesn't much matter what apple and google do as long as MS manages to get some kind of competent platform out there.
MS already has the best development tools and a huge developer base that far surpases the MS haters (androids) and other OSS fans, and the 5 apple developers out there. However MS hasn't listened to the demands of their 3rd party developers and they moved at a snail pace with the tools and the platform to target phones.
I suspect microsoft will bet it's strategy on silverlight. Even in it's v2 beta 2 form, it is already far superior in both tooling and power than anything android brings to the table. MS has already said they will focus on getting silverlight running on their mobile browsers and apple's safari and I suspect google's chrome.
Apple obviously doesn't know how to make platforms given they are the equivalent of living in north korea if you are a developer. so I suspect the battle will remain between google and MS with apple just improving the hardware.
Windows developers will go for MS, and ms haters will go for android. The world hardly changes.
RIP, Windows Mobile.
darn it - wtf is me ZunePone...
"MS already has the best development tools and a huge developer base that far surpases the MS haters (androids) and other OSS fans, and the 5 apple developers out there."
Keep on whistling past that graveyard at your peril.
"Apple obviously doesn't know how to make platforms"
*LOL*
No problem for Apple. MS obviously doesn't know how to make an operating systems ..
"MS already has the best development tools"
Keep on dreaming ..