The Unwanted Side Effects of Technology Immersion

I feel very strongly that technology can have a positive impact on our lives, and I need look no further than my profoundly deaf son, who can now hear thanks to a pair of cochlear implants, as proof. But too often, technology is used poorly if not incorrectly, and the immature ways in which we allow technology to dominate our lives is a societal issue that needs to be addressed.

Alas, this has been happening for a long time.

In 1985, I spent the summer after I graduated from high school working for a tiny construction company. My boss had what was, back then, an incredibly rare piece of technology—a car phone. As I was driving around in his truck one day, it rang, so I picked it up. (It was my boss. He said: “Why did you answer my phone?”) And I recall getting interested stares from riders in other cars. Drug dealer or doctor, they seemed to wonder. (Based on my appearance, the former was more probable.)

Years later, I got married and moved to an apartment in an upscale Boston suburb that’s home to many doctors and lawyers. (I must have helped the town meet some minimum income requirement.) Driving behind one resident on the way to work in the early 1990s, I had another phone/car first: The car in front of me was swerving repeatedly over the yellow line. Figuring he was drunk, I started beeping and flashing my lights, and I was eventually able to pull up alongside him. It was a doctor talking on an early cell phone, something I had never witnessed before. I told him he’d almost hit several oncoming cars and sped off with his disbelieving face burned in my memory.

Such events are of course commonplace today, and it’s unclear whether anything is more distracting to drivers than their phones. But that first run-in with a cell phone–wielding lunatic never left me, and when a friend called me from his first cell phone years later, I asked where he was calling from and when he told me he was driving I hung up on him.

In more recent years, we’ve all seen people immersed in their smartphone screens, walking into poles, people, and other objects. But even before these tiny mobile computers became all the rage, even before the white ear buds started popping on iPod-toting dullards, people were ignoring what I take to be an implicit social contract when using their phones. There were the Nextel push-to-talk phones that let you turn a sophisticated digital device into a World War II–era field phone and let everyone in the caller’s area get in on the conversation. These phones would utter a loud chirping sound to precede each part of the call, and everyone around the caller could hear both parts of the conversation because it occurred in speakerphone style. Thanks for sharing.

As recently as last night, before a flight to Seattle, I witnessed for the first time the modern version of this clueless behavior, as two 20-something girls proceeded to have a very loud FaceTime conversation with a houseful of people back home using an iPhone. They excitedly blathered about nothing to the people they’d just left, and the phone on the other end was handed in turn to each person there, much to shock of everyone else in the waiting area. It was the perfect example of technology abuse—two people absolutely oblivious to the needs of those around them, and it lasted a good 20 minutes. Or as I would describe it, an eternity.

Anyone who spends any time at all on public transportation or planes knows what I’m talking about. The little kid who’s allowed the play some iPad game, without headphones, at full volume in the seat in front of you. The people who play music or, increasingly, YouTube videos on their phones, also without headphones and often to the point where the volume is so high it actually distorts the sound, while everyone around them inches away when possible or looks on with disbelief.

A few years back, I was visiting Washington, DC, with friends. They have a young daughter and the three of them are as immersed in tech gadgets as you can be. The couple both have iPhones, iPads, and MacBook Airs, and the kid gets all the hand-me-downs and is thus always demanding new entertainment. Waiting for them outside the White House where they had gone on a tour, I watched a large group of people exiting and staring at their surroundings in wonder, as is normal. But not my friends: They exited this historic building with their faces glued to tiny screens. I was embarrassed for them, in a way. But mostly I just felt bad that they couldn’t take a few minutes to take in the outside of the White House on their way out. Angry Birds, or Twitter, or whatever can wait. This was likely the only time any of them would ever visit this place.

I’m not immune to the silliness, of course. I post pictures of food on Facebook with the best of them and justify it by explaining that I only do so for truly special meals, of which I’ve apparently had quite a few. But in many ways, I’m ahead of the curve. As I write this, people are just purchasing their first smartphone, their first tablet, or maybe even their first hybrid Windows device. And they’re experiencing that weird bond, or misguided love, that makes that device not just an important part of their life, but part of their being and self-worth. I went through that temporary condition years ago, and now I have a very different problem: I’m awash in these devices and they’re more of a responsibility than a life-altering newness. They’re work.

And this gives me, perhaps, a unique perspective. When people argue about esoteric tech topics related to mobile devices—such as whether Windows Phone has “enough apps” or even “enough of the right apps”—it makes me realize that we’re just treading water. None of this stuff is particularly important, and all of it is temporary. In a few years, we’ll be debating whether offices, restaurants, and bars have the right to ban wearable technology. And then we’ll move on to implants. Windows Phone?

The bigger issues, however, are timeless. And I think we need to spend more time worrying about how we allow technology to run our lives, rather than the reverse. And to really address why we are so absolutely selfish toward others when we do so. I’m not saying that I’m wishing for a global electromagnetic pulse (EMP) catastrophe that would render all these devices unusable. But I am looking forward to a time when we can all mature in our use of technology, stop starting at tiny screens, awash in useless information, and start enjoying the world and the people around us more.

Discuss this Article 21

BananaJr
on Mar 13, 2013
Based on the examples given I can only conclude that Microsoft has done a fantastic job of minimizing technology immersion by creating products that limit interactivity. Windows 8 is the latest example of Microsofts efforts to create an OS you only want to stay in long enough to get your work done. Windows Phone has taken another route by limiting what you can do with twitter and facebook within the OS and then by not having a large app library so there is a limit on what you can run on the device. They shuttered the mobile media device products division so you can't become an headphone toting dullard. Paul correctly points out that other companies (with Apple the worst offender) are compounding these issues with the design of their products. If only these poor souls would take Microsofts customers lead and eschew purchasing these mind robbing products.
Fab
on Mar 13, 2013
Wow! Assuming you're talking about us, I didn't remember being glued to our screens when we walked out of the White House (a tour we enjoyed greatly by the way). And I'm certainly sorry we embarrassed you. Still, I value your point a great deal since I try to do just that: not always looking at my screen to keep contact with people around me. Failing a great deal if I understand what you described ;-). I also tend not to answer phone calls (or video calls for that matter) when I feel I don't have time or the possibility to focus on the call. I will certainly pay even more attention starting today!
alvatrus
on Mar 12, 2013
An EMP to destroy our dependence on computing? Oh, Brave New World! The very real dangers of over-exposure of electronic devices I've seen: - shortened attention span - decreased creativity - need for instant fulfilment, impatience - decreasing practical skills, reasoning and analytical thought processes (ie: people getting dumber) - inability to cope with setbacks and different opinions - rudeness towards anonymous people / passers by - diminishing awareness of consequences
dkh16692
on Mar 12, 2013
Hear! Hear! I very much agree with you, Paul. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate and ejoy technology, however it is too many times that I see all around me people who have let technology take over their lives instead of intelligently using technology as the useful and fantastic tool it can be. I'm sure you realize you will get slammed for your stance; I for one stand with you in agreement that we should use technology in moderation rather than in excess.
scottm99999
on Mar 13, 2013
Excellent article...thanks! Everyone should take time daily to unplug..in the manner described by Original BrickEngraver. We could use more of the "quiet car" concept.
mflopez
on Mar 12, 2013
I think that if we follow thiese observations to their logical conclusion we would use a lot less technology. In the consumer arena, it's purposes are largely communication and entertainment. We may have been dazzled into thinking that we cannot have enough of these things without technology, but that is a falacy. Truly meaningful and fulfilling communication and entertainment require face to face time and physical contact, as well as time. The instant, over the wire variety cannot compare or make up for this. So as long as we insist of staying "connected" by technology, we are actually sacrificing what we are truly seeking.
alanj
on Mar 12, 2013
I have to admit I am guilty of this at times. Thanks for reminding me. I'm setting a bad example for my own kids.
mottte
on Mar 12, 2013
Albert Einstein had said it perfectly all those years ago... I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.
Gordon_Keenan
on Mar 12, 2013
Great article and I could not agree more! As someone once said... with great power comes great responsibility... and the power of the device you use, should be used responsibly around stingers and in public places. Maybe we need an app as standard on phones where we can cause an offenders phone to give them an electric shock when they are so ignorant of others!
_Nine
on Mar 13, 2013
"There were the Nextel push-to-talk phones that let you turn a sophisticated digital device into a World War IIera field phone and let everyone in the callers area get in on the conversation." Thanks, Paul for making me laugh this morning! If only the typical Nextel conversation was as important as those WWII field communications...might have been less offensive. "None of this stuff is particularly important, and all of it is temporary." I think about this a lot, especially since I'm a BlackBerry user (by choice) and can't use many popular apps by which platforms are judged. And while it would be nice to have some of them, I wonder how often I would use them anyway. Of course, this makes me question whether I'm missing a whole world of interactions by being on the sidelines and that I need to get more "engaged." Whether people realize it or not, I think part of what grips them to their devices and social media is the fear of missing something...they want to be caught up on everything. It's a contagious feeling...that, "But somebody could have tweeted about something really interesting" feeling. But, what people miss are the trade-offs. Engaging with these gadgets involves time, which is a scarce resource. You might think you're multitasking, but if you're spending time glued to Facebook on your phone, you're not doing something else, such as taking in the view of Pennsylvania Avenue. Maybe I'm just self-conscious, but it feels like there is a subtle elitist-type mentality that disparages those who are less digitally connected. And it's this that I hope changes once the "dust settles" with mobile technology.
brianritzi
on Mar 12, 2013
Thanks Paul. I've been reading your articles for years now, and you've always written very informative and insightful stuff. However, this article is one of your best yet. This is important for us all to keep in mind as we move forward with technology in our lives. -Brian
chrishilt0n
on Mar 12, 2013
Paul - an excellent article and point of view
dregourd
on Mar 13, 2013
Mc Luhan Hello, Just read 'understanding media' by Marshall Mc Luhan to have the confirmation of this phenomenon: the strong solliciation of few senses (view and touch, for example) can put us in an hypnotic state.
Victek
on Mar 13, 2013
Couldn't agree more. Perhaps in the past when we didn't have these devices there were times we were more bored, but it was also easier to notice things around us. There has always been rudeness in public perpetrated by oblivious people, but now it is greatly exacerbated by devices that take our attention away from our surroundings. I follow some simple rules to reduce rudeness and also danger, eg stop walking when checking my phone, move away from people when taking calls, and keep hands off the phone when driving! The last can be hard sometimes, but you only have to look at the accident statistics to realize how serious the danger is.
jcroy727
on Mar 12, 2013
"Im not saying that Im wishing for a global electromagnetic pulse (EMP) catastrophe that would render all these devices unusable." How about a focused EMP pulse that could just render the offenders device useless? Just for a few minutes. Great article Paul.
amitvarudkar
on Mar 13, 2013
This belongs to the "Points to Ponder!" category of articles; and you make some vital points to ponder!
BrickEngraver
on Mar 12, 2013
A few years back I went to Denmark to visit the LEGO factory and after the trip, the guide put me on a bus to the next town where I could catch a train to Copenhagen. I arrived at the train station and of course, being the bit of a fool that I am, was confused about how to buy a ticket. I essentially broke in line because did not understand I was supposed to take a ticket and watch for my number come up above a free ticket agent. Well the Danes, being the nice people they are kindly and politely told me the error of my ways and I apologized and all was good. I get to the agent and she tells me that the only ticket they had left was a ??? ticket and I of course said OK. So I got on the train and settled into my seat, and being the excited and over talking Southerner that I am, struck up a conversation with the very nice and polite man next to me. About 5 minutes later, there was a tap on the shoulder and a man pointed at a sign at the front of the car which I had of course not noticed. I was in a "quiet car"--no cell phones, no talking--just reading, thinking, and watching the countryside go by. My first reaction was of course that that was wrong, but that reaction only lasted a millisecond, and I understood what a great idea it really was. The Danes have it right.
Mortarm
on Mar 13, 2013
>Waiting for them outside the White House where they had gone on a tour, I watched a large group of people exiting and staring at >their surroundings in wonder, as is normal. Wouldn't it be more normal to be wondered going /into/ the WH? After all,coming out, you've already seen the outside. Except your friends, perhaps. :)
Joneszee
on Mar 12, 2013
Couldn't agree more!... good article..
yaqoobj
on Mar 13, 2013
Thanks for a great article Paul. I'm just about to re-read The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul, which is pretty heavyweight stuff but what you've said sums it up a lot more succinctly in some ways!
jersey72
on Mar 18, 2013

Haven't been here in a while, but I'm glad to see the trolls are still around.

Please or Register to post comments.

Upcoming Training

Mastering System Center 2012

During over 6 hours of training you can join John Savill from your computer as he will walk you through the key components and capabilities of System Center 2012, what’s involved in using the components, and the benefit they can bring to your environment.

Register Now

Current Issue

May 2013 - The NameTranslate object is useful when you need to translate Active Directory object names between different formats, but it's awkward to use from PowerShell. Here's a PowerShell script that eliminates the awkwardness.

CURRENT ISSUE / ARCHIVE / SUBSCRIBE

Windows Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the Windows Community in our Forums.