Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


June 12, 2007

Google Details its Vista Complaint

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

Faced with the public revelation of a previous complaint it had made privately to the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Google on Monday began providing some details. Previously, the company had issued a 49-page written complaint to the DOJ, alleging that the instant search feature in Windows Vista made Google's desktop search product run poorly.

"The search boxes built throughout Vista are hard-wired to Microsoft's own desktop search product, with no way for users to choose an alternate provider," a Google spokesperson said Monday. This, and the fact that Microsoft makes it too difficult for users to turn off Vista's built-in search, Google says, is a violation of Microsoft's 2002 antitrust consent decree.

Remember, however, that Microsoft publicly detailed its plans for desktop search in Windows Vista before Google even shipped a desktop search product of its own. And while a variety of companies, including Apple, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and others shipped their own desktop search add-on products in the interim, Vista's integrated search was well established by 2003, and the shipping version is truly an integrated part of the OS and notably doesn't contain any hooks to Microsoft's online services. It is, in other words, just part of the OS. Google's desktop search product, meanwhile, works like its dominant online search service and provides numerous links to Google's online services.

"If we were creating a feature in Windows and somehow requiring people to jump from our feature to our Internet search, then I could at least understand an antitrust argument being raised," said Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith.

Microsoft complains that it has already made "dozens" of changes to Vista in order to appease competitors and antitrust regulators from around the world. "We don't believe there are any compliance concerns with desktop search," a Microsoft spokesperson said Monday. "We've also told officials we are committed to going the extra mile to resolve this issue."

Attorney generals from several states are investigating the matter and are apparently giving some weight to the Google complaint. Separately, Microsoft faces a regularly-scheduled compliance hearing on June 26, and it's likely that the newly-revealed Google complaint will be among the topics discussed there.

End of Article



Reader Comments
attorney*s* general, Paul, not attorney generals :-p

PatriotB6007 June 12, 2007 (Article Rating: )


"Vista's integrated search was well established by 2003, and the shipping version is truly an integrated part of the OS and notably doesn't contain any hooks to Microsoft's online services. It is, in other words, just part of the OS."

EXACTLY. Which is why Google's claim is baseless. I think they're counting on technological illiteracy to validate their claim. Good analysis, Paul.

lotsamystuff June 12, 2007 (Article Rating: )


Ammending Vista's integrated search to allow Google's service to be put in place is not only a security risk and new attack vector, but also will undoubtedly hinder performance.

Filesystem searching has been a fundamental portion of operating systems since the 1970's and has exploited performance enhancements through kernel integration since the 1980's. Microsoft including their own indexed search system in a modern operating system is expected by users, it is not some featureset forced upon them.

This claim by Google reeks of the boy who cried wolf and is beyond foolish.

I suppose Microsoft is also violating antitrust violation by creating an in-house windowing API, thus crippling Sun's Java Swing API by not offering users a way to insert this alternative rendering method in place of MS's.

will84 June 12, 2007 (Article Rating: )


"I suppose Microsoft is also violating antitrust violation by creating an in-house windowing API, thus crippling Sun's Java Swing API"

um....didn't Microsoft and Sun settle long ago and do the cross-patent agreement dealy?

XP

Waethorn June 14, 2007 (Article Rating: )


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Battery Life Issues Almost Certainly Not Windows 7's Fault

While Microsoft is still investigating a notebook battery life issue that was supposedly caused by Windows 7, some interesting trends have emerged. ...

Confirmed: Battery Life Issues Not Windows 7's Fault

Microsoft on Monday issued a lengthy statement about the recent Windows 7 battery controversy, echoing my assessment from earlier in the day, but backing it up with hard, cold evidence. ...

Microsoft Warns of Windows Version Expirations

Microsoft warned that this year will see three out-of-date Windows versions slip into retirement. ...


Related Events Deep Dive into Windows Server 2008 R2 presented by John Savill

Configuration Manager SP1 and R2 Overview

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement