Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


June 11, 2007

Safari, Not Leopard, is the Real News at Apple Show

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Macintosh Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

Apple CEO Steve Jobs must have smiled knowingly when his announcement about a Windows Web browser got more applause than any of the features he just demonstrated for the next version of Mac OS X. Despite ostensibly dedicating a speech Monday to Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard," Jobs had an ulterior motive to show off Apple's real platform for the future. And getting Safari running on Windows is just the first step to realizing that vision.

But first, Leopard. A year ago, Jobs promised he would one day reveal a number of "secret" Leopard features, but Monday's feature-complete revelations about the upcoming OS were lacking anything truly new or exciting. The takeaway here is that Leopard, quite clearly now, is another evolutionary update to Mac OS X and not a revolutionary, major update.

Why Apple would claim otherwise is steeped in the company's vaunted secrecy-based marketing, and Apple uses just a few regularly-scheduled and impromptu events to launch major new products and make other announcements. Given its decision to ignore Leopard at January's MacWorld event--the company focused instead on the iPhone--Apple had little choice but to cart out Leopard this week at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) show and hope that Jobs could wow the crowd yet again.

Instead, Jobs discussed just ten Leopard features, five of which he had previously highlighted at last years' WWDC event. Dismissing a feature called Boot Camp, which has been available in public beta form for a year, Jobs only talked up three truly new features: A new desktop, a new Finder (the Mac version of Explorer), and Quick Look, a document preview feature that, frankly, could have been lumped in with the new Finder. In short, there was very little interesting aside from the standard Apple eye candy.

Despite the amount of time spent discussing Leopard in the keynote, it's clear to me that Leopard is not really the main event at the show, nor is it the primary platform that Apple is really pushing going forward. No, that honor goes to Safari, Apple's Web browser, and its underlying rendering technologies. During the keynote, Jobs made two Safari-related announcements. First, Apple released a beta version of Safari for Windows, and this Web browser product is now available for free download. Jobs claimed that Safari already has about 5 percent market share on the Web, third behind Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) and Mozilla Firefox. But I don't think shipping a Windows version of Safari has anything to do with market share, per se. No, Jobs has something more dramatic in mind for Safari.

That's because Safari now sits at the center of Apple's plan to support third party developers who want to create iPhone-compatible applications. This was the second Safari announcement: Previously, Apple had said that it would not open up the iPhone to developers due to security concerns. But at his WWDC keynote, Jobs revealed that Apple would in fact allow developers to create near-native iPhone applications that run on top of, you guessed it, Safari. These applications will use Web 2.0 technologies like Ajax and will look and feel almost exactly like the native iPhone applications that only Apple is allowed to create.

Now you can see why Apple porting Safari to Windows is so important: Most iPhone developers, like most iPhone users, will be running Windows, and not Mac OS X. And for them to create iPhone applications, they will need a version of the iPhone runtime environment. That environment is Safari. If Apple can get even a small percentage of Windows desktop users and all iPhone users to adopt Safari, it will have created a next-generation Web-based computing platform that is far more compelling, and has a potentially larger user base, than the PC market itself. It's an astonishing strategy. And you read about it here first.

End of Article



Reader Comments
So, will this be the beginning of Browser Wars III or maybe Apple vs Google?

--tayme

tayme June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


"Apple vs Google?"

don't plan on it. Apple and Google are tying the proverbial knot, so to speak, through extensive partnering. so WHICH platform has more spyware now??

XP

Waethorn June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


Waethorn:

You're exactly right. Apple and Google are best chums - especially since what's his name from Google sits on Apple's board.


I am very curious to see if Safari gets more attention from blackhat types now. Fortunately, I would guess that vulnerabilities in Safari for Windows would not apply to Safari for Mac. Of course, I'm sure there will be exceptions.


And Paul:

I think you're right; the desktop OS metaphor has really matured to a point where there's no "blow-me-away" stuff anymore. But I think Leopard is still a solid release. Quick Look is fantastic (I curse every time I double click a photoshop file by accident and photoshop starts its 8 year loading process). Spaces will be nice - especially on laptop screens. The 64 bit aspect doesn't really come into play for me because I don't often need to address more than 4GB of RAM. And the new Finder is FANTASTIC. iTunes is one of the best and easiest UIs ever created and I love that they've extended it to the Finder.

But yes, until voice recognition hits the market or until computers start working like Minority Report, I think the desktop OS with keyboard/mouse has reached old age. It's all about refinements at this point.

bdkjones June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


Also, about Paul's Safari theory:

I agree. I think Apple is positioning Safari for the future. But what Paul doesn't really hit on is that Safari as a platform will let you write an application once and then deploy it to any number of devices (with just a little tweaking).

So you write MyGreatApp and run in on OS X, Windows, iPhone, and the kitchen toaster without having to recompile or rewrite code. That's a huge plus.

bdkjones June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


One last thing:

The redesigned Apple website is fantastic and long overdue. I like how John Gruber put it best: "They took those 10.1 tabs down to the basement and shot them too."

bdkjones June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


1. The Mackies here suddenly come alive when there's an Apple announcement. This outpouring of positivity from them is a rare sight. They are usually panning MS products (example, Surface).
2. Paul's Safari theory sounds right to me. I agree too that it's a very good move by Apple.
3. Paul's theory about Steve Jobs acting like a Tiger in front of thousands of sycophants also seems correct. He's usually at his snarky best when he is surrounded by his own private bonches.
4. Paul said something on his Nexus blog to the effect of Windows "fans" calling him an Apple sycophant. I don't think he's one. I do believe he has a bias towards Microsoft (specifically towards XBox), but in his attempts to keep both sides happy, he seems to not have a fixed opinion on anything. I'm sure we'll see an article from him about how cool Surface is soon.

shark47 June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


Historically, what does Apple's stock do after WWDC? Just wondering because today, it dropped 3.45%...

--tayme

tayme June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


@bdk

Photoshop takes 8 years to start up on your mac? Funny, because it only takes a 11 seconds on my Vista machine on the first start up, and 5 seconds after that. I don't mind Photoshop CS3 loading at all.

@tayme

The hype didn't pan out. Period.

Like I mentioned in an earlier thread, I wouldn't be surprised if Apple ported iLife, iChat, and iWork over to the PC side at the rate they're going. With Safari, they managed to implement a mini - OS X inside, replete with sliding modal dialogs, their typographical text, the scroll bars, the preferences menus, the annoying resize square (I'm used to being able to resize windows from any corner or side), and all the animations associated with Apple interfaces. Considering *how far* they took the mac interface to Safari in Windows, I'm surprised at the rather snappy performance. Although bloated, it isn't as bad as quicktime or iTunes.

NateB2 June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


"I curse every time I double click a photoshop file by accident and photoshop starts its 8 year loading process"

maybe a computer upgrade is in order then. Photoshop CS2, albeit with it's Vista issues, loads up within 10 seconds on my farely modest Core [1] Duo T2300 notebook (that's a 1.66GHz for you Mac fans, since Apple doesn't use Intel's model numbers or platforms such as Centrino/Viiv/vPro), with 2GB of RAM. i didn't notice any performance decreases moving to Vista from XP either. however, i've moved on to much bigger and better things now....

the Expression Suite is a hugely more gratifying experience, and quite frankly, Silverlight really has no competition on the horizon. the Knowledge Center resources on the website are really great too.

(check out those tutorials!)

http://www.microsoft.com/expression/kc/resources.aspx

"until voice recognition hits the market"

what, that's not in Leopard? Vista's got it and it works great! you usually need to do the "level 1" training for good accuracy but unless you work for Dell's tech support (*cough* India *cough*), you don't need to do "level 2" training at all.

"The 64 bit aspect doesn't really come into play for me because I don't often need to address more than 4GB of RAM."

only a niche market does - why do you think Windows hasn't completely moved over to it yet? wait until Windows Codename Vienna for that - me I'll probably switch with Vista SP1 if "necessary", but only if a new system warrants it.

here's a little glaring tidbit i'd like to point out that the Mac people will likely hate:

Core [1] Duo processors DO NOT support "Intel 64" (formerly known as "Intel EM64T"). that means that OS X for Intel Mac's isn't even 64-bit unless it's on a Xeon (Mac Pro) or Core 2 Duo system!!! that would mean that first-generation Intel-based Mac's/MacBook's were falsely advertised as being "64-bit". the Mac Mini is still a Core [1] Duo also.

HA! TAKE THAT!

XP

Waethorn June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


*sigh*

You know nate, as I was typing that photoshop comment I thought to myself, "Man, I'll bet someone here is going to make a comment about how fast this is on Windows and how Macs must suck."

But I figured it would be something we could all have a little chuckle about. Photoshop is a beast of an app. You get my point.


Tayme:

You're right, Apple's stock is acting unexpectedly. Luckily, however, there is a steady rock in our universe on which we can rely... Microsoft's stock hasn't changed in years. If you take Apple's current share price and divide by 3, you'll be in the ballpark of MS's. ;)

bdkjones June 11, 2007 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 23, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some post-PDC some soul searching, a Google Chrome OS announcement and a Microsoft response, Windows 7 off to a supposedly strong start, the Jonas Brothers and Xbox 360, and so much more ...

2009 Windows IT Pro Editors' Best and Community Choice Awards

Picking a favorite product from an impressive crowd of competitive offerings is never an easy task, and such was the case with our Editors' Best and Community Choice awards this year. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...


Related Events Best Practice Tips for Managing and Supporting User-Owned Smartphones

EUROPE: Oracle Enterprise 2.0 Virtual Conference

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement