Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


July 06, 2006

WGA Garners More Attention, All of it Bad

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Security Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

Subscribe to this email newsletter at http://www.windowsitpro.com/email/

While Microsoft continues to both defend and roll out its spyware-like Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) service around the world, the company is facing two WGA-related threats. First, security researchers have identified a software worm that disguises itself as WGA. Second, a new class-action lawsuit was filed against Microsoft late last week, alleging that WGA is spyware and that Microsoft is misleading consumers about the technology.

WGA is a downloadable software service that Microsoft makes available via Windows Update and Automatic Updates. The service is divided into two components: WGA Validation, which checks to ensure that your PC isn't running a pirated version of Windows XP, and WGA Notifications, which is the piece that has raised privacy and security concerns. WGA Notifications was designed to display annoying pop-up alerts to users who are running pirated versions of Windows. But the software was also secretly phoning home to Microsoft servers every time an XP system rebooted. And Microsoft had made WGA a critical security update on Windows Update and Automatic Updates, despite the fact that it was until recently in beta. That means millions of users inadvertently downloaded unfinished Microsoft code to their PCs without understanding what they were doing and how the software behaved.

Since owning up to the software's clandestine behavior, Microsoft changed WGA Notifications so that it doesn't phone home on every system reboot. But the company also took WGA out of beta and began rolling out the service, automatically, to Windows users worldwide. Last week, a class-action lawsuit was filed in the state of Washington, alleging that Microsoft was violating California and Washington consumer-protection laws. Unfortunately for Microsoft, that was only the start of its WGA-related problems.

This week, security researchers at Sophos identified a worm called Cuebot-K that disguises itself as WGA and is spreading via AOL's Instant Messenger network. The worm identifies itself as "wgavn" and "Windows Genuine Advantage Validation Notification," and is installed to run each time the system boots. If the user tries to disable the worm, he or she is warned that doing so could result in system instability. Behind the scenes, Cuebot-K disables the Windows firewall and opens a back door from which hackers could remotely control the PC, steal personal information, or launch Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDOS) attacks.

But wait, there's more. A group of companies and individuals has filed a second class-action lawsuit against Microsoft for delivering spyware to consumers in the guise of WGA and deceiving consumers about its intentions. The suit complains that WGA secretly communicates with Microsoft's servers and "gathers data that can easily identify individual PCs," contrary to Microsoft's assertions.

Microsoft says the suit is without merit. "This distorts the real objectives of the [WGA] program and obscures the real issue, which is the harm to consumers posed by software piracy," a Microsoft spokesperson said. "As with all of our programs, we've gotten constructive customer feedback, the program has evolved, and we've made improvements. Microsoft continues its efforts to foster better communications with its customers."

End of Article



Reader Comments
"...the harm to consumers posed by software piracy"


I love how the word "consumer" has become a synonym for "Microsoft's Bottom Line"

Software piracy has harmed me about as much as a good massage.



"As with all of our programs we've gotten constructive customer feedback..."

So, being sued is "constructive customer feedback"? Honestly, do PR reps think before they issue statements?

bdkjones July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


I think it's time that Apple make some important decisions and release their OS for non-apple hardware. If they do it by the time Vista is released, they'll be TRUE competition for Microsoft.

Kizzume July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


I'm a software developer and believe that all users of pirated software should be dealt with. WGA might not be dealing with the problem in the right way but it is there for a good reason.

shingoro July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Boy am I going to sound like a shill for this, but yes, piracy hurts customers who don't pirate.

Why, because it hurts Microsoft's bottom line. In order to pay for the piracy Microsoft has to raise the cost of the software. Now, has Microsoft raised it higher than I'd like... yes. But the point remains.

Imagine I have a truckload of peanuts. I paid a certain price for the truckload of peanuts (production/marketing/support costs for Windows). If people start snacking on my peanuts, I have to charge a higher price on the peanuts I can sell. Now if snacking becomes epidemic (as in parts of the world), then I might decide to hire a rent-a-cop (WGA) rather than raise the price of peanuts because if you raise the price enough times, you're going to price yourself out of the market.

It's a simplistic example, but follows basic econmic principles. Again, Microsoft still charges more than I like, but still less than other viable competition (*nix isn't viable for me).

orion.adrian@gmail.com July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


I'm starting to believe that Windows is a fantastic operating system, as long as you don't attach it to a network (including the Internet).

lotsamystuff July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


The real problem is that pirates will almost always be able to find a way around copy protection, so there's not a whole lot to gain by including anything that alienates paying customers.

(and what the hell is going on with the validation images?)
On the flip side, WGA doesn't actually affect ordinary everyday users. There aren't millions of people wandering around the web wondering how to remove it because it isn't affecting them. Hell, they probably don't know it's there.

Benn21uk July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Yeah, it was a *really* bad idea for the notification service to check Microsoft's servers to see if it should shut itself off because it was in beta. I mean it's not like we'd want the program to automaticly disable itself in the event a flaw was discovered, so lets go ahead and disable the phone-home feature so that if a flaw is discovered instead of shutting off on next boot it might be 2 weeks before it can be disabled.

Oh and Paul, looks like Apple is in hot water for pretty close to the same thing.

Jason Cox July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Bonch: Here's a good one for you!

Mac OSX phones home regular too!

http://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=33959

MLomasIcomm July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Orion,

A problem with your analogy is that peanuts are a physical, limited commodity while software is more similar to intellectual property. It only hurts Microsoft’s bottom line if the person who is pirating would have actually purchased the product which I would argue that normally they would not. For example, I used to run a pirated copy of Windows Server 2003 at home so I could learn and test the OS for my job. However, if I had been unable to obtain a pirated copy I would never have shelled out hundreds of dollars to buy the software. Therefore, I did not steal a peanut that could have been sold to someone else. We had a meeting a few months ago where we were asking our Microsoft rep. why there were so many problems for us obtaining software in the Philippines for one of our markets. He said it was because of piracy problems they were concerned with. We tried to explain that because of their fears and restrictions that our markets were using Linux instead but he did not appear to see the irony.

It was the same argument that I had against the recording industry with Napster. I used to download songs from Eminem but never in my life would have spent money purchasing his CD’s, so I was not “costing” the industry any lost revenue. However, I was being unethical with MP3’s and pirated software and because of this decided to no longer download. But the main point is I do not believe the majority of pirated software/music/movies would have been “purchased” otherwise.

lucidloon July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"A problem with your analogy is that peanuts are a physical, limited commodity while software is more similar to intellectual property. It only hurts Microsoft’s bottom line if the person who is pirating would have actually purchased the product which I would argue that normally they would not."

While I might agree that people wouldn't buy music as there are a lot of options, the relatively small number of options when it comes to operating systems almost assures that a person would buy Windows (either with a new PC or separately). If you have a PC you will get Windows 80-90% of the time as most people need it and Linux won't cut it (OS X isn't free).

Also the idea that pirating a copy is ok because you wouldn't have bought it anyways is morally reprehensible to me.

orion.adrian@gmail.com July 06, 2006 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4   5 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Anti-Virus Vendors Prepare for War with Microsoft ... Again

When Microsoft announced its Windows Live OneCare security and PC health product over five years (as MSN OneCare), Symantec, McAfee, and the other consumer-oriented security vendors reacted with stunning vigor. ...

What You Need to Know About Microsoft's x64 Server Product Plans

What do Longhorn Server, Windows Compute Cluster Server, and Windows Vista have in common? The x64 platform. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...


Security Whitepapers Sustainable Compliance: How to reconnect compliance, security and business goals

The Impact of Messaging and Web Threats

Why SaaS is the Right Solution for Log Management

Related Events WinConnections and Microsoft® Exchange Connections

DevConnections, Microsoft® ASP.NET Connections, SharePoint Connections and SQL Server Connections

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Security eBooks Spam Fighting and Email Security for the 21st Century

Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

Related Security Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format

Test Drive IT Solutions and Get Free Music Downloads
Solve your toughest IT problems with these free downloads and receive 5 free music downloads!


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home asp.netPRO Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing