Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


July 20, 2005

Spyware and the Danger of Numbers

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Internet Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

A recent report by the Pew Internet & American Life Project proves what most of us have suspected for some time: Spyware, malicious software that's typically installed on your system surreptitiously and can perform any number of unwanted actions, is changing the way people use the Internet.

The numbers are astonishing. According to the report, 91 percent of Internet users have changed their browsing habits to avoid spyware, 81 percent have stopped opening email attachments unless they're sure the attachments are safe, almost half have stopped visiting certain Web sites because they're afraid those sites are silently installing spyware on their PCs, and 25 percent have stopped downloading music and other files from peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing networks. (One has to wonder why that last figure isn't higher.)

Like terrorism and global warming, spyware has created an aura of fear about it, but unlike those examples, spyware is all too often the fear of the known, not the unknown. As far back as October 2004, most Internet users had had some form of spyware installed on their PCs. That figure is likely much higher today.

Aside from the obvious problem--the theft of crucial information, including credit card numbers and passwords--spyware materially affects the PC experience. Infected computers run slower, freeze, or crash. New desktop icons and applications begin appearing. Your Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) home page changes, or new IE toolbars appear.

I've written about spyware a lot since suffering my first Trojan attack in May 2005 while testing the Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) beta. In March 2005, I addressed the spyware problem in two Windows IT Pro UPDATE articles, "Spyware: The Greatest Threat Yet to the Corporate Desktop?" and "Microsoft Takes Action Against Malware" (See URLs below). So what's changed since then? Sadly, a lot has changed.

First, spyware is now a fact of life on the Windows platform, and if you administer Windows systems, you're responsible for ensuring that spyware doesn't make it to your users' desktops. That means you need a managed antispyware solution in place sooner rather than later. Like antivirus and other electronic protections, antispyware is now part of the equation. If you don't have a way of stopping it, you're not doing your job.

Second, you need a plan to deal with electronic attacks that succeed. What happens when spyware has already infected users' systems? What happens when intruders have already stolen crucial data? Data theft is a terrifying concern for individuals but what about a corporation's data? Is your CEO's laptop adequately protected?

Finally, the spyware scourge, which the Pew Internet & American Life Project survey says is changing the population's computer using habits, is causing a more fundamental change. Most Windows IT Pro UPDATE readers are likely familiar with Apple Computer's stunningly successful iPod MP3 player. Heck, many of you probably own an iPod. I happen to own several, although that's a different story altogether. Many analysts and industry pundits had predicted that a "halo effect" from the iPod would cause customers to consider Apple's other major product, the Macintosh computer, as well. The halo effect, they said, would lead to increased Mac sales and, perhaps, change the dynamics of the computer market.

So far, it's impossible to prove that the halo effect is real. But Mac sales grew 43 percent in the first quarter of 2005 and 35 percent in the second quarter, much higher than the PC industry average of 14 percent during the first half of 2005. Analysts are now wondering aloud whether the spyware problem that bedevils Windows-based PCs--but not Macs or Linux machines--is a contributing factor to Apple's sudden success with the Mac. Some suggest it's the single biggest factor--far more relevant to new users than the iPod halo effect.

The evidence is compelling. For the first time, PC users are simply throwing out computers that are infested with spyware, rather than trying to fix them. The problem is that spyware-infested PCs are often impossible to fix. Instead, you need to wipe out the system and start over again. In managed environments, this isn't a huge problem beyond backing up crucial data, but for individuals, it's a nightmare. With PC prices now starting at less than $300--or about $500 for an entry-level Mac mini--consumers are just starting over. It's simpler.

When the personal computing market first kicked into high gear in the early 1980s, computer enthusiasts were responsible for getting big business excited about the technology. First, VisiCalc-equipped Apple II computers began appearing in businesses, followed by IBM PCs running Lotus 1-2-3. Today, Mac laptops--called PowerBooks--are beginning to appear more and more often in the planes, Internet cafes, and press rooms I frequent around the country. Tech enthusiasts--what we might call tech influencers--are turning, increasingly, to the Mac.

For Microsoft and its Windows-using customers, this change could be a problem. Or, if you're interested in a safer computing experience, it could be a solution. Although many business users require Windows-specific applications that won't run on the Mac, a good percentage of Windows users today require only very basic services, including word processing, email, and Web browsing. These needs are well served by a Mac or even by a Linux-based PC, both of which are arguably safer today than Windows machines.

Questions emerge, of course. Is a more heterogeneous environment really safer, or is that just an added layer of complexity? And are Windows alternatives more secure because they're better designed or because so few hackers attempt to infiltrate those machines? These are questions for the ages, I suppose. But in a world where spyware is only the most recent attempt at tearing down the House of Windows, I'm beginning to wonder whether the alternatives don't make some sense.

Pew Internet & American Life Project Spyware Report (PDF)
http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/160/report_display.asp

Spyware: The Greatest Threat Yet to the Corporate Desktop?
http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/45577/45577.html

Microsoft Takes Action Against Malware
http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/45688/45688.html

End of Article



Reader Comments
Nice article but what have you done with Paul Thurott? I recently bought my first Mac and it's been a great experience so far. To be fair, I never have any issues with spyware or viruses on my Windows PC but then I know how to keep that crap off my system. Where I'm going crazy is having to spend my weekends cleaning up my family and friends' computers. I'm about at the point where I tell them to get a Mac or find someone else who's willing to waste their weekends working on computers.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


our society tries to generalize everything and make issues appear neat when they are not; the soundbite mentality. computers are just tools. you use the tool that best meets suits your needs. as prices have declined, computers have become consumables. people are becoming more educated about the options they have for choosing a tool. the race in the future will not be so much about spyware problems (that will eventually be managed), but what real added functionality a new computer offers. think of the cpu in your car. you don't buy a particular car because of its architecture or clock speed. computers in the future will be purchased based on what USEFUL functionality is wrapped around the CPU. the brand winners will be the ones who do not let their design get in the way of the functionality. the increase in mac marketshare has as much to do with the appeal their products have to our "soft" side as anything else. they were extremely sneaky in tricking us into a fundamental change in the way we listen to music by creating a portable single function computer that does exactly that. i disagree with those who say they were late to the mp3/walkman game and just better. the reasons their competitors are having trouble getting traction is they are too busy copying to have the basic understanding that apple has: change the way people listen to music (the way to compete with apple is to change it even more-not copy). remains to be seen if apple really has another card up their sleeve to change the way we interact with video.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Apple's OS X operating system is what's responsible for the strong growth in Mac sales; the lack of spyware and other malware on OS X is but one of its many many advantages over Windows. Surely there is some "halo effect" as Windows users see what a fine and attractive solution iTunes is even on their PCs and how well the iPod's slick design and classic interface lets them do what they want with it really really easily. But almost all computer hardware sold today except the most crippled budget systems is way more than good enough for the average user, and it's the strength ease of the operating system and the integrated iLife suite of applications for working with digital media that sells Macs to one-time Windows users (like me).

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


I use Mac, Windows and Linux. I have more free time on my hands now that friends and family have started switching to the Mac and don't need constant help from the spyware or virus demons inside. Mac OS X is an excellent operating system. I just wish Apple would start a proper marketing campaign around it and do a better job of getting the message out.
Pete
http://www.sladehome.com

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


I travel overseas on business and moved from a ThinkPad to a PowerBook 3+ years ago simply to avoid the risk of malware while halfway around the world. Since then I have upgraded the business PowerBook to a faster one and added a 23" display - the perfect combination for an office, thanks to depreciation expense. At home the PCs are gone and a 20" G5 iMac takes care of most things, with a 12" iBook for the wife to use while propped up in bed.

I don't hate MS like some Mac users. I run VPC with XP Pro as I need XP to demo an app to prospects. I also use Visio under VPC and the Mac version of Office.

The important thing for me is that I spend zero time focused on virus/worm/spyware issues. I just use my computer - just like in the old days with Windows 3.1. It brings back the pleasure of using a computer and is well worth the price.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Good stuff.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


It's really getting tough out there for the average PC user that's not willing to invest the time to learn how to harden their system against the kaleidoscope of attacks in the wild. As a long time multi-platform computer user that only uses Windows at work, I have marveled at how much people have adaptively been willing to put up with on their home PCs. That seems to be changing, slowly but surely.
I have seen the IT staff at work spend ever increasing time fighting the good fight to keep a complex multi-platform network clean. The time and money upgrading to add protection, not capability as well as fixing corrupted systems is wearing on even these long time Windows people. I think all but one of them is using LINUX on their home computers or is dual-booting now- only using Windows for gaming or other limited use. After spending all day with the mess they don't want to come home to it.
It should be noted that the main UNIX system and various UNIX-type clients have NEVER been compromised while the Windows servers and clients have been the subject and source of all of the trouble. The IT staff are not old-school UNIX people who reluctantly adopted Windows, they are MS Certified Windows people who only have used UNIX where they 'had' to. The track record of the MS stuff compared to the UNIX is pushing them slowly to the tipping point.
The other bane of their existence is hiding from the endless brain picking they endure from Windows users with infected/crashed home PCs. Every trip to the cafeteria, break room, etc is highlighted by at least one "can you help me" from fellow employees.
Guess which minority group never seems to bother them about such things? The growing base of Macintosh users. I have the great fortune of using UNIX equipment to get my work done and have limited need for XP. I only can grin when our stuff keeps on while the Windows stuff is the source of most every problem that crops up. I don't know if I should feel sorry for these people or not.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


People are switching to the mac in a two-step process. First, they start thinking about it because of (in order of importance): (1) Windows security nightmare, (2) good experience with iPod/iTunes/iTMS, (3) hear good word of mouth from mac users (also good press reviews).

Then, they go look at the mac and decide to do it. Why? Main reason - they now realize for themselves its simply BETTER MADE and does everthing they want to do BETTER and EASIER. Because that's how Apple made it. f***ing better.

The only people sticking with windows after they see the mac are gamers; DIY/geek/knowledgeable types that like the added flexibility; paralyzed people that are too afraid to change; corporate types that have to have an "IBM" like they use at work

Second,

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Don't forget, there are two classes of entrenched Windows users. The already mentioned ignorant/unexposed do not switch to the Mac out of fear, and because they have recently invested in Wintel hardware, and are not skilled enough to switch to Linux. The second group resistant to change is the Windows power users who get off on the ego trip of having people always ask them for help and aren't yet sick of wasting their time.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


Welcome to the party, Paul.

Anonymous User July 20, 2005 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
2009 Windows IT Pro Editors' Best and Community Choice Awards

Picking a favorite product from an impressive crowd of competitive offerings is never an easy task, and such was the case with our Editors' Best and Community Choice awards this year. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 23, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some post-PDC some soul searching, a Google Chrome OS announcement and a Microsoft response, Windows 7 off to a supposedly strong start, the Jonas Brothers and Xbox 360, and so much more ...


Related Events Deep Dive into Windows Server 2008 R2 presented by John Savill

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement