Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


November 01, 2004

With iPod Success, Apple Takes "Network Effect" from Microsoft

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

During the epic Microsoft antitrust trial with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), witnesses and government experts spoke of the "network effect" that Microsoft enjoyed because of the success of its relatively low-price Windows products. Today, however, the company that's most obviously enjoying the benefits of the network effect is Apple Computer, whose iPod portable audio player now dominates an important emerging market. And, ironically, Apple's success with the iPod is coming at the expense of Microsoft and its partners, which have watched as competitor after competitor fail to make a dent in the iPod's armor.
  
The iPod, which Apple released in November 2001, wasn't the first hard disk-based portable audio player, and it didn't become a smash success until a year and a half later, when it finally tallied sales of more than 1 million units. Since then, sales have been phenomenal and have risen over time. To date, Apple has sold about 6 million iPods--2 million in the most recent quarter alone. Today, the iPod enjoys a 65 percent market share of the digital portable audio player market and a whopping 92 percent share of the market for hard disk-based players such as the Dell Digital Jukebox (DJ) and the Rio Carbon. The iPod enjoys such success despite some disadvantages compared with the competition, which often sport better battery life, better compatibility with online stores, more storage, and lower prices.
  
So why has the iPod been so successful? One reason is that Apple has been able to parlay its device into a must-have fashion accessory. Unlike the company's Macintosh computers, which are excellent but expensive, the iPod is an affordable luxury, one that young professionals and even students--or at least their parents--can afford. As Apple CEO Steve Jobs said during a recent special event marking the release of new iPod models, "iPod has become a cultural phenomenon." And he's right. Sometimes products transcend their market categories and reach into the public consciousness at a much deeper level than would usually be possible.
  
Clearly, the iPod is such a product. This situation makes it difficult for competitors such as Dell, Rio, or even Creative Labs, which arguably created this market, to make inroads with other products. Consumers aren't asking for portable audio players this holiday season; they're asking for iPods. And a Dell DJ or Creative NOMAD Jukebox Zen isn't going to cut it. Any parent or other gift-giver who believes otherwise simply doesn't understand the emotional connection Apple created between the tiny white devices and their owners.
  
But the iPod's network effect doesn't consist only of loyal fans. Apple deserves credit for steadily building on the iPod's success by introducing new products and services based on the device's platform and by nurturing a third-party market of accessories that elevates the iPod's success. Last week, Apple introduced two new iPod models, the iPod Photo and iPod U2 Special Edition, which I personally find to be lackluster, for the most part. But to the iPod Nation, these products are simply the latest validation that they've made the right choice. The iPod product line is growing, and when these loyal customers are ready to upgrade--and no doubt hand off their current iPod to another family member--they'll find exciting new choices awaiting them.
  
An obviously successful add-on for the iPod is the Apple iTunes Music Store, which offers more than 1 million legal song downloads and has sold more than 100 million songs. Currently, the iTunes Music Store dominates the online music services market with a 70 percent market share. And as Apple adds to the list of countries in which the iTunes Music Store is available, sales are rising dramatically. In May, the company sold almost 11 million songs, but that figure rose to 17.7 million songs by October. And these sales come in the face of increasing pressure from competing services such as MSN Music, Napster, and RealPlayer Music Store. As with the iPod, almost all these competitors offer real advantages over the Apple offering--including better quality songs and lower prices, in many cases--but those advantages haven't mattered. Despite the presence of several competing online services, most of which offer songs that are interoperable on a variety of software-based players and portable audio players, no one has been able to chip away at the iTunes Music Store's lead.
  
Celebrity endorsement helps. Thanks to the Mac computer line, creative professionals have long preferred Apple's products. But the iPod brings out the musicians, athletes, moviemakers, and other creative types in a most unprecedented fashion. U2, one of the most popular musical groups in the world today, has endorsed a specific iPod model and offered its entire musical catalog available for sale only through the iTunes Music Store. But U2 is only the most obvious example. All around the world, celebrities of every stripe not only use iPods but talk about them endlessly. To a nation obsessed with celebrity, this attention hasn't gone unheeded by the teaming youth of America. They want iPods, and they want them now.
  
And no iPod should stand alone. Although the Dell DJ or Rio Carbon each sport a few accessories, such as cases or belt clips, the iPod enjoys a booming market of hundreds of accessories and services, from the obvious (cases) to the sublime (a professional painting service that will apply car paint to your iPod and, optionally, its dock). To say that the iPod even competes with other products is to completely misunderstand the market. The iPod is a lifestyle. Put another way, two groups exist: the iPod and all other portable digital audio players. And the two groups don't necessarily have a lot to do with each other.
  
One area into which the iPod's success hasn't translated is Apple's long-languishing Mac line. Although Apple had hoped that a swell of iPod customers would result in higher sales of the pricey but elegant Mac, that hasn't been the case. According to Gartner, Mac's worldwide market share fell to 1.8 percent in the most recent quarter, down from 2.1 percent in the same quarter a year ago. (Annual computer sales figures placed the Mac market share at 1.7 percent for calendar year 2003.) In the United States, the Mac's market share dropped from 3.6 percent to 3.2 percent in the same time period.
  
Why has the Mac failed where the iPod succeeded? Curiously, the pundits--and I'll count myself among this group--seemingly were wrong about one crucial aspect of Apple's iPod strategy. We said that Apple was making the same mistakes with the iPod that it made with the Mac by keeping the system proprietary. But the markets for the Mac and iPod can't be compared so simply. Today, the Mac is an excellent computer but it doesn't offer much value over Wintel-based systems and is correspondingly too expensive, both in out-of-pocket costs and in the cost of migrating to a new computer platform. The Mac and the computers that compete with it typically cost $1000 to $3000, which is beyond the reach of many consumers and not a purchase to be made lightly by anyone but the truly affluent.
  
The iPod, meanwhile, is in a completely different price category. It's both more expensive and more nicely styled than the competition, but customers believe that they're getting value for the extra cost. As noted previously, the iPod is also an affordable luxury. As with iPods, celebrities also use Macs, but celebrities can afford Macs. Most regular people can't. The iPod is a celebrity accessory many more people can afford.
  
In these ways, Apple's iPod strategy can't fairly be compared with the company's Mac strategy because the iPod isn't a product you'll be stuck with for several years, as you might be with an expensive computer. Apple has done something unique with the iPod. More important, perhaps, Apple has finally beaten Microsoft at its own game. The iPod, not Microsoft's extensive platform and ecosystem, is defining the market for portable digital media. And for a company that has long struggled in the shadow of its massive competitor to the north, that's good news indeed.

End of Article



Reader Comments
Paul, is a $999 iBook (less with student discount) really only affordable by the "affluent"?

It's too early too tell whether the iPod will increase mac sales significantly. As you point out, the iPod only recently starting shipping in big time volumes. These things take time. It's premature to say the iPod has "failed" to have an effect.

Also, while it's correct that the iPod has become a cultural phenomena and that's a big part of the explanation for its continued dominance, it's not the whole explanation.

iPod/iTunes/iTMS as a whole (along with Aiport Express streaming) is superior to the WMA platform. It's easier to use. It's got few glitches. The design of the human interface is cleaner and better and more attractive. That's how the iPod BECAME a cultural phenomena.

You don't want to admit that - so you're looking for alternative explanations. It's a rationalization, if you will, for the iPod's success. You don't like admitting that apple products are better in any way that wintel products. You'll only go so far as to say they're good or excellent. Never better. YOu can't bring yourself to admit that.

Anonymous User November 01, 2004


Most people can't afford a $799 eMac? Or a $999 iBook? Macs are as expensive as PCs were just a few years ago -- and plenty of everyday people bought PCs then.

Anonymous User November 01, 2004 (Article Rating: )


Just a thought, coming from the college environment where the iPod has really exploded (we're all plugged in on campus!). Lots of people have gotten iPods and, when comes time to buy a new computer, say they're going to get an Apple. And I've asked many of them why - the answer is "Dude, if the iPod is this cool, how cool must the laptop be?"

Apple may be right on with their strategy - it just may take a little while.

Anonymous User November 01, 2004


"iPod/iTunes/iTMS as a whole (along with Aiport Express streaming) is superior to the WMA platform. It's easier to use. It's got few glitches."


May I ask what you are trying to say?

WMA is a audio compression technology (supirrior to AAC btw...).

Yes, the iPod certainly is nice, but it have it too have problems.
And btw... my iRiver player works perfectly, with absolutely no glitches.

If the iPod had not become a fashion item, it would never have had a chance in this marked.

These days, looks is everything; and with the iPod, Apple got it right.
And THAT is what made the product a sucess - not the technology.

Anonymous User November 01, 2004 (Article Rating: )


Apple products (in general) aren't any beter or worse than its PC counterparts. Apple products are however extremely expensive when compared to its PC counterparts (apples to apples so-to-speak).
The iPod is successful because: It is easy to use, connect/synchs w/o problems to iTunes content (which, content wise, crushes other online music retailers), is priced right, and lastly because popularity is a seller in itself.

Anonymous User November 01, 2004


Apple made a mistake in the first few years of the Mac's existence (1984-6) in selling the first Macs for nearly $3000. They were worth every penny, but they were too expensive for most people. If they had sold them for less, Microsoft would have NEVER had an opening to sell its inferior but cheaper products in the early 90s. Apple's not making that mistake this time -- and just watch that halo effect keep expanding....

Anonymous User November 01, 2004 (Article Rating: )


i agree the only point i aint gonna buy a mac its too expensive plus if it breaks, ur in for a hefty bill unlike a pc just replace the part, pcs costing about £200 £300 and macs 2nd hand £600+

Anonymous User November 01, 2004


WMA is the worst codec out there and a derivative of QuickTime 3 btw

Anonymous User November 01, 2004


The eMacs and low-end laptops of which you speak don't feature anywhere near the same performance of similarly priced PCs.

For example, for £549 (from the Apple Store UK website) I can get a 1.25GHz PC.
For £489, I can get a Dell PC with a P4 2.8GHz

Even if you argue that the Apple CPU is more efficient and has a better architecture - there's just no way it can possibly make up for the 1.55GHz difference between the two.

The eMac is a bottom of the range budget system - if you want to match the power of a PC, you need to spend allot more money.

I also don't think most students will by looking for a Mac. They may be fashionable, but surely many students might want to be able to play games - and apart from the fact that fewer games are released for the Mac, the power needed for the latest games is more expensive on the Mac platfoem.

Anonymous User November 01, 2004 (Article Rating: )


The differences between WMA and AAC are minimal, and most 'listening tests' have come up with different results - mostly showing that WMA is better on some tracks, and AAC is better on others.

Most music stores sell tracks at 128K bitrate - at that level it doesn't really matter whether the track is in AAC or WMA - it's good enough for tracks I don't care about.

If it's a track I _DO_ care about, thats a different story. I'm more inclined to want better quality, and for that I'm still going to have to go down the shops and buy the CD, and then probably rip it to a Lossless codec - and at the Lossless level both codecs are going to have a hard time beating each other!

Anonymous User November 01, 2004 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 23, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some post-PDC some soul searching, a Google Chrome OS announcement and a Microsoft response, Windows 7 off to a supposedly strong start, the Jonas Brothers and Xbox 360, and so much more ...

2009 Windows IT Pro Editors' Best and Community Choice Awards

Picking a favorite product from an impressive crowd of competitive offerings is never an easy task, and such was the case with our Editors' Best and Community Choice awards this year. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement