A Seattle labor group claims to have evidence that Microsoft is shifting mission-critical work--including parts of Longhorn, Microsoft's epic next-generation Windows project--to overseas contract workers. Microsoft denies the charges, maintaining that company employees still produce its core products.
The Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech), a union that's affiliated with the AFL-CIO, said that it's received leaked Microsoft contracts with Indian technology vendors that prove that the company is outsourcing core-product development. "The notion that next-generation technology is going to be the exclusive domain of domestic-based employees of the company is rapidly fading away with the disclosure of these documents," WashTech Organizer and President Marcus Courtney said.
According to WashTech, Infosys Technologies, Satyam Computer Services, Tata Consultancy Services, and Wipro Technologies--India's four largest software technology and services companies--are working on Microsoft projects. WashTech noted that these projects include building specialized tools, creating user guides and other documentation, and testing. One of the documents WashTech listed was a Longhorn migration guide. But none of these projects appear to be core Microsoft products, a fact that Microsoft noted yesterday in a public rebuttal of WashTech's allegations.
"These accusations don't reflect an understanding of our global business," a Microsoft spokesperson said yesterday. "As a global company with operations in more than 80 countries, we absolutely work with partner companies around the world, but both Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have clearly stated the majority of our core development work will remain in the [United States]. All [core] intellectual property development, including Longhorn, is done by Microsoft employees." The spokesperson noted that for fiscal 2004, which ended June 30, outside companies performed only 4 percent of Microsoft's development work.
End of Article
This is a complete non-story. Oooh, they're outsourcing a migration guide... Clearly, that's a mission-critical component. Geesh. This is news?
pwhittemore July 29, 2004 (Article Rating: )
Americans are so jittery about being non-competitive that there would be the same kind of flap if MS moved its campus from Redmond to Vancouver. Why shouldn't other countries be part of the development of Windows? After all, they are customers too. And they pay higher prices for the same products.
Why doesn't Intel get hammered for making their chips in Asia? Such is the hypocrisy of the USA
DonnEdwards July 30, 2004 (Article Rating: )
You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor?
Register now
Picking a favorite product from an impressive crowd of competitive offerings is never an easy task, and such was the case with our Editors' Best and Community Choice awards this year. ...
An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some post-PDC some soul searching, a Google Chrome OS announcement and a Microsoft response, Windows 7 off to a supposedly strong start, the Jonas Brothers and Xbox 360, and so much more ...
Free CDs Offer Fundamental Content for IT Pros Are you up to speed on the latest technologies and solutions? Don't miss out on your chance to get up to speed quickly on fundamental, in-depth information on some of the hottest topics in our library of content.
Let Your Users Reset Their Own Passwords: Free Download Try a 30 day free trial of Desktop Authority Password Self-Service – it provides an easy-to-use, robust system for allowing users to reset their own forgotten passwords or locked accounts.
Get Windows IT Pro & Mark Minasi’s Favorite Power Tools Guide Order Windows IT Pro now and get "More of Mark Minasi's Favorite Power Tools"--a in-depth guide to the most useful Windows commands --FREE with your paid order! Subscribe today, and save 58% off the cover price!
Deep Dive into VMware vSphere, eLearning Series Join John Savill to explore the major functionality capabilities of the vSphere virtualization platform, including identification of the changes from ESX 3.5.
pwhittemore July 29, 2004 (Article Rating: