Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


April 2004

Comparing SATA RAID and SCSI RAID


RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Backup and Recovery Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

I've noticed that many new motherboards come with Serial ATA (SATA) RAID options. My company is in the process of replacing some old SCSI RAID—based servers, and we're considering purchasing some SATA RAID—enabled systems. What are the advantages and disadvantages of SATA RAID compared with SCSI RAID?

SCSI RAID and SATA RAID aren't exactly in direct competition; both satisfy different needs. SCSI (or the higher-bandwidth Fibre Channel) provides high-performance, multitasking RAID systems, whereas SATA RAID provides inexpensive fault tolerance.

SCSI and Fibre Channel are the tried-and-true choices for high-end RAID systems that support financial or other crucial data. Furthermore, the cables that SCSI systems use let you conveniently attach external storage to a server. And, primarily because of the SCSI chipset's bus-mastering capabilities (i.e., because the chipset does the bulk of the work involved in sending data to the server processor), the commands for SCSI transfer let multiple users multitask with ease. ATA was developed as an inexpensive, nonmultitasking alternative for desktops. Current ATA cable length is limited to 18", making inconceivable the thought of ATA satisfying any aspect of serious server RAID. Even though SATA does away with this 18" limitation, SATA RAID just isn't a realistic alternative to the more expensive SCSI systems when you must meet a need for high performance.

When cost is the main concern, however, or when availability of data is more important than rate of transfer, SATA RAID is an excellent choice. SCSI and Fibre Channel are available in 10,000rpm and 15,000rpm models; large SATA drives are currently available only in 7200rpm models. A 37GB 10,000rpm SCSI drive costs $175, a 37GB 15,000rpm SCSI drive costs $350, and a 74GB 15,000rpm drive costs $700. In comparison, a 37GB SATA drive costs $125, and a 160GB SATA drive costs about $150. You can place five 160GB 7200rpm SATA drives in a RAID 5 configuration for the price of one 74GB 15,000rpm SCSI drive. The SATA array won't approach the performance of the SCSI drive, but for the same price, the SATA array gives you the fault tolerance of RAID 5. As SATA RAID matures, its usefulness in these types of situations is sure to increase.

End of Article



Reader Comments
sata is available at 10k rpm, Western Digital Raptor 74Gb S-ATA [10K]

Patricio Araya May 06, 2004


Right to the point the way I like it.

Anonymous User October 27, 2004 (Article Rating: )


i have a 300 gig maxtor sata 7200 rpm 16 meg cache for my storage but for a main drive to run your OS would u rather a 10,000 rpm drive with 8 megs of cache or a 7200 rpm with 16 megs of cache both sata which would be better to run a OS off

Anonymous User January 29, 2005


Only WD Raptor offers 10K rpm, if you want to go economical, choose Hitachi/IBM GXP series drives.
For SATA, Samsung spin point series is also one of the best.
For more speed, get a raid card with cache module support. You can add 128MB or more buffer...
fastest solution

Anonymous User February 03, 2005 (Article Rating: )


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 9, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some more Windows 7 sales momentum, some Sophos stupidity, Microsoft's cloud computing self-loathing, more whining from the browser makers, Zoho's "Fake Office," and much, much more ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

Understanding File-Size Limits on NTFS and FAT

A general confusion about files sizes on FAT seems to stem from FAT32's file-size limit of 4GB and partition-size limit of 2TB. ...


Related Events Disk-to-Disk Grows Up

WinConnections and Microsoft® Exchange Connections

Effectively Shrinking Your Backup Window – with CA ARCserve Backup Data De-duplication and the Riverbed Steelhead Appliance

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement