Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


October 17, 2003

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of October 20

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news...

 
Confirmed: Windows XP SP2 Still on Track for Early 2004
   I confirmed with Microsoft yesterday that the schedule for Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) hasn't changed. The service pack will appear in early 2004, as planned, not by the end of the year. The confusion started when a Microsoft executive misspoke at Citrix iForum 2003 earlier this week; ZDNet quickly published his comments. As first reported in WinInfo Daily UPDATE, XP SP2 will include all the post-SP1 hotfixes as well as Microsoft's Springboard security technologies (e.g., a new version of Windows Update, an improved firewall, new protections against buffer-overrun attacks). The inclusion of this technology explains XP SP2's late schedule.


Hell Hasn't Frozen Over: Apple Needs Windows Users to Succeed
   Apple Computer launched iTunes for Windows yesterday at a predictably glitzy event that was big on pomp but fairly uninspiring when viewed in the cold, flat light of the next morning. Apple did what it needed to do, duplicating the successful (and excellent) iTunes application on Windows, although the company might have been a little too successful. iTunes for Windows is such a copy of its Macintosh counterpart that it supports Mac-style--rather than Windows-style--resizing (meaning windows don't truly "maximize," which stinks); uses Mac OS X-style "candy drop" user controls; and supports Apple's idiosyncratic Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) audio format (in addition to MP3), but not Microsoft's widely used Windows Media Audio (WMA) 9 format. iTunes for Windows users can sync with only Apple's iPod, not with the 40+ portable audio devices that support WMA 9. This shortcoming is unfortunate and a strange reversal of the norm for Apple and Microsoft, in which the latter is usually the company accused of locking users into its integrated solutions. Today, Apple is locking users into its products, and it's too bad because iTunes is otherwise an excellent application, well worth looking into. On the good-news front, iTunes for Windows fully supports Apple's online music store, which will have more than 400,000 songs by the end of October, according to the company. I particularly love Apple's "Hell froze over" tagline because it's silly: If Apple didn't support Windows users, the iTunes Music Store would be just another innovative also-ran. Apple is being practical: With BuyMusic.com, Musicmatch Downloads, Napster 2.0, and other PC-based music services breathing down its neck, Apple had little choice but to support more than 1 percent of computer-using public.
 
Microsoft to Issue Reply in EU Antitrust Case Today
   Microsoft is scheduled to deliver its reply today to the antitrust charges that the European Union (EU) levied against the company. The EU charges might ultimately prove to be more damaging to Microsoft than similar charges brought against the company in the United States, however, because EU antitrust laws stipulate some serious potential consequences, including a large fine and the possibility of requiring Microsoft to unbundle certain features in Windows. Will any of these things happen? Microsoft has dodged so many bullets in the decade since I first began studying the company that I don't see how it will do anything other than escape scot-free, but I guess we'll see.


Microsoft Expands 64-Bit Versions of Windows Server 2003
   This week, Microsoft revealed that the company is bolstering its 64-bit server product line with some previously unannounced products. These new Windows Server versions support the AMD Anthlon 64 platform in addition to the Intel Itanium; Microsoft previously announced only 64-bit Windows Server products that run on Itanium. The new versions include Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition for 64-Bit Extended Systems (AMD64) and Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition for 64-Bit Extended Systems (AMD64), both of which will launch with Windows 2003 SP1.


MSN Broadband to Provide Antivirus Services to Subscribers
   Microsoft revealed today that subscribers of the upcoming MSN Premium 9 will get new antivirus and firewall features, courtesy of a licensing agreement with security firm McAfee Security. MSN Premium subscribers will receive McAfee VirusScan and McAfee Personal Firewall Plus desktop-protection products as part of their subscription, Microsoft says, whereas MSN Plus and MSN Dial-up subscribers will be able to access trial versions of the services and purchase them through the MSN site for a discounted price. MSN Premium, MSN Plus, and MSN Dial-up? Aren't all those choices a bit confusing? These new products will ship as part of MSN 9, due this winter. Seeing how consumers react to the multiple offerings should be interesting.


Microsoft, Partners Prep for Office 2003 Launch
   On Tuesday, Microsoft will launch Microsoft Office 2003 in New York, and I'll be there to provide a full report. But despite a radically improved Microsoft Outlook, two new applications--Microsoft Office OneNote 2003 and Microsoft Office InfoPath 2003, the latter of which won't see much use outside of large corporations--and a slew of small improvements, Office hasn't changed much with this release. So how will Microsoft sell users on yet another Office version? With its partners, naturally. This launch event will be notable almost solely for the sheer number of Microsoft partners that will show up for the event, hawking wares and services that run on top of the Office platform. Microsoft says that by 2006 this market will be worth $117 billion to partners--a heady sum. More about Office 2003 next week.


Office 2003 Developer Tools Debut. But What About Access?
   In the early days of Office, "Office development" essentially referred to Microsoft Access and the Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) environment, which let programmers access various Office application features. Today, Office 2003 is quite different: It includes Visual Studio Tools for Microsoft Office System, a mouthful of an add-on product for the professional Visual Studio .NET environment that raises the bar both for developer sophistication and for the quality of the add-ins developers can now create for Office. Using Visual Studio Tools for Microsoft Office System's advanced tools and programming language, developers can create applications that run in Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Word task panes. But am I the only person who noticed that Microsoft has completely abandoned Access users with this release? Shouldn't the suite's most programmable application have enjoyed some advances as well?


More Losses for Sun
   Sun Microsystems has watched its earnings tumble year over year for 10 consecutive quarters, and the company's financial picture is getting uglier these days. This week, Sun posted a $286 million loss on revenues of $2.54 billion, down 8 percent from the same quarter a year ago. The company also warned investors that its loss for the upcoming quarter will be far worse than previously expected. The news sent Sun's stock price tumbling to as low as $3.58. No matter how you feel about Sun, the company is in trouble. It sells an aging, expensive, proprietary version of UNIX that runs on aging, expensive, proprietary server hardware in an era when inexpensive Linux and Windows servers that run on commodity PC-based hardware offer similar or superior performance for far less money. The company has refused to change course or lay off workers, causing a Merrill Lynch analyst to publish a rare public letter to the company in which he blasted its management for not seeing the light.


HP Catches Up to Dell in PC Market
   Recently released PC sales figures revealed an unexpected trend: Sales of HP PCs are gaining on Dell PC sales, causing some people to wonder whether HP is poised to regain the number-one position. Dell commanded 15.3 percent of the market in the quarter ending September 30, but HP held the number-two spot with 15.1. Rounding out the top five were IBM (5.3 percent), Fujitsu (3.7 percent), and Toshiba (3.1 percent). But the big news is HP, which saw its gap with Dell shrink. In the second quarter, HP sales trailed Dell by 400,000, and that gap fell to 62,000 units in the third quarter. Will we see a price war in time for the holidays? Now wouldn't that be a sweet Christmas present?


Opera 7.21 Arrives with More New Features Other Browsers Can Shamelessly Steal
   Opera Software unveiled its Opera 7.21 Web browser this week, giving other browser organizations fresh fodder from which to copy new features. This version of Opera includes some innovative new ideas, including an Undo feature that lets you reverse accidental window closures and a new version of the kiosk mode, which had been missing in action for a few releases. Kiosk mode is designed for public computers in which you don't want the user to have any access to the underlying system or unrelated Web pages. Opera 7.21 also features less obtrusive advertisements and is now available for Windows, Linux, Sun Solaris, and other platforms.

End of Article



Reader Comments
Paul,

Well, it looks like we have success (technically) with iTunes for Windows. Bottom line, it's version 1.0 and there isn't much to complain about, is there?

As for Windows Media 9, what Apple is doing is pro-standards. AAC is a standard not controlled by one company like Windows Media 9. Why does MS always have to insist upon its own, one-company standard? This arrogant, obnoxious and anti-consumer behavior needs to stop. Anything Apple can do to bury Windows Media is good for consumers. Still, I don't know if they will be able to bury it, since there's so many people like yourself that look the other way for MS. So Apple will probably end up adding WMA support (it has been rumored for iTunes 5).

Why buy anything other than an iPod anyways? They start at 299. What is the cheapest other player (hard drive)? They just aren't that much less and we all know they aren't as good. So why bother? Why use Napster, Musicmatch, buy.com. So you can run them on a crappier mp3 player? Where is the advantage for the consumer here, Paul? If you really want to save money, you'll probably stick to mp3s from Kazaa anyways and iTunes and the iPod is fully compatible with mp3 (unlike Windows Media player which makes you pay extra for that).

At bottom, why use an inferior solution to use a format that is one-company (a company that has a bad history of violating the antitrust laws to the disadvantage of consumers). I just don't get it Paul.

Editor's note: Well, that's pretty obvious Cliff. :) I like the irony in "Why buy anything other than an iPod anyways" and "why use ... a format that is one-company" by the way. --Paul

Cliff Stevens October 17, 2003


The new site layout simply sucks, and why didn't you have the URL properly redirect from wininformant.com? Half-assed. Not sure what you hoped to achieve but you failed.

temp8 October 17, 2003


I love it, Paul. You just can't get enough of the Mac-Heads yelling at you, can ya? :)

Rob

Rob October 17, 2003


iTunes for Windows is great news for competition - but so far the battleground is still primarily in the US. So far the only company offering an online music store to us Eurpeans is: Microsoft - and it's no half measure too. MSN Music Club has been very easy to use, and I strongly recommend anyone longing for Apple to bring iTunes to Europe, that they give MSN Music Club a try!

Music war, is this the new browser war? ;)

Mark Lomas October 17, 2003


About Opera and "some innovative new ideas" including "reverse accidental window closures" as a feature other's will "copy". I can't tell who had this first, but MyIE2 has had this for quite some time now. In MyIE2, go to Edit>Undo Close>Reopen Last Closed Tab, or even select from a list of recently closed tabs[windows]. You might want to look into this before crediting this specific "new" feature to Opera as "innovative".

Just nitpicking really, but nevertheless...
--Peter

Peter October 17, 2003


AAC doesn't belong to Apple---it's an industry standard

gettinbranded@sbcglobal.net October 17, 2003


Ref: Office 2003 Developer Tools Debut. But What About Access?

See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/office/officetools.aspx

Microsoft Visual Studio Tools for the Microsoft Office System includes:

"Microsoft Office Access 2003 Developer Extensions. The Access 2003 Developer Extensions provide the tools and resources developers need to more quickly and easily create, test and deploy sophisticated Access solutions. The Developer Extensions include a royalty-free Access Runtime enabling distribution of Access solutions. The Developer Extensions also include tools, with source code, for creating professional setup routines, globally searching solutions for custom strings and creating solutions that have been stripped of all source code."

James Kelly October 17, 2003


Hey, Paul, I know you're a Mozilla guy, but I'm glad to see you give props to Opera! I also used to be Mozilla all the way until I tried Opera and realized where all the cool features came from, but without the inexplicable lag, bloat, and memory consumption. I have about 10 tabs open and it's still only taking up 14MB of memory.

I'm really curious to see where Microsoft is headed with Internet Explorer. It seems like the browser experience has finally made some incredible innovations recently, and Microsoft is refusing to budge.

Preston Sumner October 17, 2003


"iTunes for Windows is such a copy of its Macintosh counterpart that it supports Mac-style--rather than Windows-style--resizing (meaning windows don't truly "maximize," which stinks); uses Mac OS X-style "candy drop" user controls;"

Ha, ha, ha! Well it looks like I underestimated Apple. They aren't as stupid as I thought they were going to be with this iTunes Windows release. They have deliberately kept it as Mac like as possible to ensure that people still get the message that it is a Mac application and an Apple brand - or myabe they just couldn't be bothered to port the whole thing in a Windows-like way. Hilarious! Microsoft should be full of admiration. If this really takes off (iTunes hasn't quite reached enough of a critical mass yet, but has momentum) goodness knows what will become of Windows Media Player.

"and supports Apple's idiosyncratic Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) audio format (in addition to MP3), but not Microsoft's widely used Windows Media Audio (WMA) 9 format. iTunes for Windows users can sync with only Apple's iPod, not with the 40+ portable audio devices that support WMA 9."

This has got ridiculous now, and just smacks of total and utter desperation. APPLE ARE NEVER GOING TO SUPPORT WMA! They have the market share, they have the success that iTunes have brought them and, quite clearly, the momentum. If they ever did support WMA this would give Microsoft a massive leg-up and would then allow Microsoft to, in some way, dictate the future success of iTunes and Apple's music service through their own format. After many experiences in the past Apple are far to handy and experienced now to let this happen. WMA is a format that Microsoft alone controls and Apple knows that. Because of the success of iTunes and Apple's music service many people at and associated with Microsoft, true to form, are very, very desperate to get some sort of leverage on it. Hence the clamour for WMA support that is only coming from the Microsoft quarter. Not going to happen I'm afraid :). I don't see any iTunes customers complaining about the lack of WMA support. They have AAC and MP3. AAC was a format that went away but seems to have underwent something of a resurgence thanks to Apple and the MPEG4 standard that AAC is a part of.

WMA may be supported by many music download services and portable devices - but why? Manufacturers thought that because of the Windows monopoly Microsoft would be in a good position to supplant MP3 as the premier music format. It was also made, apparently, very easy for them with all of the development tools etc. Support for WMA was based on an estimation of a future market based on the number of Windows PCs in the world. It's not working out that way.

However, even with all this 'support' on music services and devices, the real question is "Is anyone actually using WMA in large numbers?" The answer is a very definite "No", and certainly the number of people listening to WMA tracks is no where near reaching the sort of critical mass that Apple, iTunes and AAC are now reaching. Given the success of iTunes, and hence the success of the AAC format, I don't think it will be too long before many hardware manufacturers will just have to re-evaluate their position regarding their choice of supported formats. MP3 support of course goes without saying. AAC is part of the upcoming MPEG4 standard, and thus, isn't completely controlled by one organisation. This is what the industry wants. It is WMA that is idiosynchratic because it certainly isn't any sort of 'standard' if is controlled exclusively by Microsoft.

Crucially, Apple seems to have eased many of the fears that a lot of people have about DRM and fair use rights - although not all. Apple has intelligently realised that if it is too restrictive, or is seen to be too restrictive in the future and can't be trusted, people will just back away. To reduce piracy you have got to remove much of the motivation for it. Unbelieveably, they have done this with the support of the "Big 5:" BMG, EMI, Sony Music, Universal and Warner Bros. Their combined catalog gives Apple a very large 200,000 songs to sell to consumers.

Microsoft seems to be going around telling everyone in the music and film industries stuff like "You can restrict x, y and z", "Oh, you can rent stuff and it will be deleted afterwards", blah, blah, blah. This is what some people would like to do, but Apple has sensibly realised that this sort of stuff is just unworkable, not necessarily in a technical sense, but that people will just not understand or put up with some of the restrictions that will be put on content. People will not make impulse purchases and will simply do without, which is particularly bad for artists, as many will not even get heard.

"If Apple didn't support Windows users, the iTunes Music Store would be just another innovative also-ran. Apple is being practical: With BuyMusic.com, Musicmatch Downloads, Napster 2.0, and other PC-based music services breathing down its neck..."

Porting iTunes to Windows was the next logical step to increasing their reach, but given that they've managed to achieve such success and sales from a small market share of the desktop OSs they have I find this pretty impressive - not even being a Mac user. I hardly think that any music service is breathing down iTunes' neck - they're all out of breath!

As for payed-for downloadable music in general, I won't be wanting to use any of them until prices come way, way down. The packaging and distribution costs for all of this are absolutely none existent and should be passed on in the same way that cost savings made from using CDs 'weren't'. 99 cents is still way too expensive and the bitrate and quality still isn't high enough either, considering I'm paying for it.

Now can we have less of Windows Media being touted as some sort of widely used standard please? It just isn't. It's certainly supported, but it doesn't follow that it is actually used.

"But despite a radically improved Microsoft Outlook, two new applications--Microsoft Office OneNote 2003 and Microsoft Office InfoPath 2003, the latter of which won't see much use outside of large corporations--and a slew of small improvements, Office hasn't changed much with this release."

I can't see anything since Office 97/2000 that I would want to upgrade for. Can someone tell me what I would get out of Office XP/2003 for practical day to day use?

"Office hasn't changed much with this release. So how will Microsoft sell users on yet another Office version? With its partners, naturally."

Oh, you mean the bully boys?

"Microsoft says that by 2006 this market will be worth $117 billion to partners--a heady sum."

A grossly overestimated figure. With Microsoft looking greatly at the SMB/SME market, I don't think that Microsoft realises that businesses just cannot afford this. They cannot afford the software let along the added 'Certified Partner' services they will have to buy. Not that I'm complaining :).

"But am I the only person who noticed that Microsoft has completely abandoned Access users with this release? Shouldn't the suite's most programmable application have enjoyed some advances as well?"

Microsoft could have done something truly innovative with Access if they had pushed it on further, but I don't know why they haven't. After all, databases are very important, and if anything, I think Access should have been made the centre of Office as it's the most useful component in there. Oh well.

"More Losses for Sun"

Sun have a lot of resources at their disposal and they are seeing threats, particularly concerning Linux-based systems, when there are really just opportunties. They also put out a lot of confusing messages. It is certainly not the goal of Linux to destroy Sun. A lot of free software can be made to run on Solaris, and indeed, particularly with Samba, Apache etc. free software actually makes Solaris work. Perhaps they should open up Solaris and concentrate on added software, services and their still excellent hardware.

The notion of cheap x86 based servers is a misnomer as far as I'm concerned, although true. Sun's cheap 'Cube' servers represent excellent value for money. There is absolutely no reason for Sun to back themselves against the wall, although I think many IT companies would be very happy with $2.54 billion in revenue. They're hardly dead.

"inexpensive Linux and Windows servers"

Inexpensive Windows servers?! Well I suppose that's subjective. We won't get into that though.

Well, that's my take on 'Short Takes' anyway. Feel free to have your own opinions.

David October 18, 2003


Hi Paul,

Possible hundreds of others have pointed this out, but AAC is not an idiosyncratic format. It is (in contrast to Microsoft's proprietary WMA format) a MPEG / ISO standard.

For more insight, check out: http://www.aac-audio.com/

Ton van der Liet October 19, 2003


 See More Comments  1   2 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Confirmed: Battery Life Issues Not Windows 7's Fault

Microsoft on Monday issued a lengthy statement about the recent Windows 7 battery controversy, echoing my assessment from earlier in the day, but backing it up with hard, cold evidence. ...

Microsoft Warns of Windows Version Expirations

Microsoft warned that this year will see three out-of-date Windows versions slip into retirement. ...

Battery Life Issues Almost Certainly Not Windows 7's Fault

While Microsoft is still investigating a notebook battery life issue that was supposedly caused by Windows 7, some interesting trends have emerged. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement