Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


June 2002

Geographically Distributed Clustering


RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Clustering and Load Balancing Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

The Octopus client also lets you perform manual failover. Two failover methods, as well as a variant, are available. Automatic Switch Over (ASO) replaces the target machine's identity with that of the source, and Super Automatic Switch Over (SASO) adds the source's identity to the target machine while maintaining the target's identity. The variant, SASO - Alias, passes an alias, or virtual identity (consisting of a computer name and IP address), between the source and target. This method accommodates failover between source and target computers that exist on separate subnets and simplifies the process of recovering from a failover.

In Double-Take, the target system monitors the source system for a failure by sending requests at a user-specified interval. When the source system is alive and well, it sends a reply. If the target system doesn't receive a reply, it counts a missed packet. (This functionality is similar to that of the Ping command.) The user-supplied value for the allowable number of missed packets multiplied by the monitor interval equals the failover timeout. On the Connection Manager's Failover tab, I set these values to three missed packets and a 5-second monitor interval—similar parameters to those of the other products I tested. Double-Take's Failover Control Center (which Figure 2 shows, along with the Double-Take Management Console) displays monitoring statistics and lets you control how and when failovers occur. You can specify additional IP addresses to monitor and make failover contingent on the failure of one or all of the monitored addresses. You can also require user intervention before the software initiates a failover.

Compared with the other two products, BrightStor High-Availability Manager offers the most options for detecting problems and initiating failovers. The intelligent failover option permits participating servers to ping a known device (e.g., a router) to determine the location of a communication problem and act accordingly. Additionally, low disk space or a bad disk can initiate failovers. You can alter these settings in the Task Editor by editing parameters under the Failure Detection icon. During a failover, the software transfers the primary server's IP address to the secondary server, and the primary server assumes a user-defined name and IP address until it's ready for reinstatement.

Legato Octopus for Windows NT and 2000 4.2
Contact: Legato Systems * 650-210-7481 or 888-853-4286
Web: http://www.legato.com/products/replistor
Price: $2499 per server

File-Server Failover
For each product, I performed network file operations against the primary file server while testing manual failover and loss-of-connectivity functionality. Manual and loss-of-connectivity failovers worked as expected on Octopus, each requiring about 40 seconds for the target server to stand in for the source. The time the software required to detect a connection failure amounted to 10 seconds of that time. During a failover, a stream of file copies flows to the file server. Any file-copy operations that time out—or fail to execute—during this period are considered lost. Octopus lets you specify a Max Wait Time value in the Switchover menu's Target Options option. I set this value to 10 seconds—if the target system can't contact the source in 10 seconds, the target system concludes that the source has failed. This value worked in my test environment, but if you use only Octopus's built-in failover-trigger mechanism, an unreliable real-world WAN link could compromise the dependability of your solution. Manual or scripted failovers are probably a safer bet.

To return to original server definitions following a SASO - Alias failover, you remove the source system name from the target system's Added Names list, then reenable and synchronize appropriate specifications on the source system. This process is much simpler than the SASO and ASO recovery processes, which require more configuration of names and IP addresses.

BrightStor High-Availability Manager performed well with a manual failover, losing one file operation, but the loss-of-connectivity test resulted in an approximately 40-second delay before the secondary server took over from the primary server. The timing for detecting communication failures is a component of the replication task's link speed setting. CA warns against exaggerating the link speed because doing so can cause false failure detection. To reinstate the servers to their original roles, you access the main BrightStor High-Availability Manager screen on the target system, go to the Server menu, and run the Reinstate Wizard. The wizard asks you to specify which server you want to reinstate. Then, you can choose to schedule the operation, warn users before the operation, and restart the replication task after the reinstatement is finished.

   Previous  1  2  [3]  4  5  Next 


Reader Comments
This is a great article - thanks !
Do you have comparison of those products with
Microsoft Clustering product ?

Arie Blum June 16, 2002


Why did you test with Exchange 5.5? Because most vendors couldn't support failover with Exchange 2000 yet? That is the question we really wanted answered... too bad.

Jeremy Vignaux July 31, 2002


Jeremy Vignaux you are quite correct, the only real way to provide automatic failover of Exchange 2000 is using MSCS. However you will find useful information on using Double-Take with Exchange 2000 at: http://192.168.0.100:3501/WhitePapers/Exchange2KDR.pdf

Ian Masters November 25, 2002


I understood the point of this article to be a test of some data replication alternatives to Microsoft's shared resource clustering of Windows 2000 Server. If Ed Roth tested these products as alternatives to Windows clustering, then why did he install Win2k Advanced Server on the test servers instead of Windows 2000 Server?

James Kidwell March 09, 2003


How can you title and article “Geographically Dispersed Clustering” mention anything about "geographically dispersed clustering." This is an article about “Clustering Alternatives to MSCS" not geographic clusters. If you wanted to talk about geographic clusters, how come you don't mention anything about the possible MSCS configurations?

How do you write a geographically dispersed clustering article for a Windows environment and not mention EMC's GeoSpan for MSCS? This product was partially (if not wholly) responsible for the creation of the "Cluster/Geographic" category on Microsoft's HCL.

While I do think that the content of your article is valuable, I think your title is very misleading.

John Toner May 16, 2003


I did my own testing using DoubleTake and arrived

Jim Calvin July 18, 2003


I noticed that SteelEye LifeKeeper is not on this list of products.
Anyone considering replication and clustering should also take a look at SteelEye LifeKeeper as it takes an application-centric view of clustering. Making the application highly available, not just the hardware and data.

Shobana Patel September 25, 2003


I use Double-Take to replicate Exchange 2000 mailstores and trans logs across a WAN, from one MSCS cluster to another MSCS cluster. The remote cluster uses Geocluster+ to simplify hard drive configuration. My mailstores total 120Gb, and I generate about 6Gb in trans logs each day. I am not using automatic failover - manual only, by choice. I'm using V4.3 SP2, and the system works very well.

Bob April 13, 2004


I agree with John Toner. Even though your article is helpful and informative it's really about replication tools that leverage mscs. When I look for information about geography distributed clusters I'm looking for shared disk scenarios over long distances (active active or active passive). If you have any information or know how on this type of implementation please share it with us.

Rafael Cruz June 09, 2004


We used a UK company called TriSys, they know all these products and recommended us with the best fit solution. We use Geospan and it has not let us down yet!

Anonymous User November 12, 2004


 See More Comments  1   2 

You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Friday at PASS Europe 2006

Kevin talks about the closing day of the event and shares a funny Microsoft film. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of September 8, 2008

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including the long-awaited back to school season, Microsoft's first Seinfeld/Gates ad, some EU insights, another Netbook improvement, Opera silliness, and much, much more ...

IE 8.0 and Chrome Could Enable Next-Gen Web Apps—Unless Your ISP's Bandwidth Cap Gets in the Way

Both browsers are being positioned as the core system application that will enable the next generation of web apps--however, ISP usage caps could throw a major monkey wrench at web-based application delivery. ...


Windows OSs Whitepapers Why SaaS is the Right Solution for Log Management

Are You Satisfied?

A Preliminary Look at Deployment Plans for Microsoft Windows Vista

Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.

Job Openings in IT


ADS BY GOOGLE SPONSORED LINKS FEATURED LINKS

IT Connections
Dive into the new Microsoft platforms and products you implement and support with the experts from Microsoft, TechNet Magazine, Windows ITPro and industry gurus. There are 70+ sessions and interactive panels with networking opportunities.

Attention User Group Leaders...
Announcing the eNews Generator—a FREE HTML e-newsletter builder for user group leaders. Build your HTML and text e-newsletters in minutes and add Windows IT Pro & SQL Server Mag articles alongside your own message!.

Master SharePoint with 3 eLearning Seminars
Learn how to build a better SharePoint infrastructure and enable powerful collaboration with MVPs Dan Holme and Michael Noel. Register today!

Get SQL Server 2008 at WinConnections
Don’t miss Microsoft Exchange and Windows Connections conferences, the premier events for Microsoft IT Professionals in Las Vegas, November 10-13. Every attendee will receive a copy of SQL Server 2008 Standard Edition with one CAL.



Interested in Email Encryption?
Read about the advantages of identity-based encryption in this free report.

Order Your SQL Fundamentals CD Today!
Learn how to use SQL Server, understand Office integration techniques and dive into the essentials of SQL Express and Visual Basic with this free SQL Fundamentals CD.

Virtualization Congress Oct. 14-16 in London
Don't miss Virtualization Congress, the premiere EMEA conference dedicated to hardware, OS and application virtualization. Oct. 14-16.
Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technical Resources Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing