Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


May 2009

A First Look at Exchange 2010

Microsoft’s latest mail server introduces improved high availability and easier management
RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Replication Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

The Future for Exchange Clients
It's long been standard practice for Microsoft to release a new version of Outlook alongside a new version of Exchange. Exchange 2010 is part of the Office 14 wave, so Microsoft will upgrade Outlook, Outlook Web Access, and Pocket Outlook (on Windows Mobile 7.0 clients) to add new features, improve usability, and accommodate the architectural changes in Exchange 2010, including some performance improvements within Outlook to deal with the demands of very large (>2GB) mailboxes. After all, there’s no point in Exchange being able to support very large mailboxes if its premier client finds it difficult to process those mailboxes, which is often the situation today.

The biggest thing you’ll notice in the client UI is a focus on conversation views where you'll be able to process complete sets of messages that make up a conversation more efficiently than you can today. MailTips, small balloon-like messages, will appear to warn users whenever an action might not make sense. For example, you’re about to use Reply to All on a message that includes 3,000 recipients. Other tips will tell users when recipients can’t receive messages because their mailbox is full or if they're out of the office and won’t be able to respond. OWA will also support MailTips and conversation views.

The Exchange 2010 Environment
Microsoft plans to release only a 64-bit version of Exchange 2010 for production, but they might again provide a 32-bit test version. Of course, now that Microsoft has Hyper-V in its armory, you can expect that Exchange 2010 will be a good candidate for virtualized deployments, albeit with the normal caveats that roles such as Client Access and Hub Transport are more suitable for virtualization than high-end Mailbox servers. Unified Messaging servers remain a poor choice for virtualization because of the demands of audio processing for voicemail. Given that experience with virtualization grows all the time, it’s wise to check with Microsoft for the latest news on support for your favorite application.

Exchange 2010 isn't supported for Windows Server 2003, so you'll have to deploy it on Windows Server 2008. As usual, Exchange 2010will have other prerequisites, such as the latest version of the .NET Framework, PowerShell 2.0, and some schema updates for AD. There's no current dependency that Exchange 2010 must access AD on Server 2008, but you'll need to ensure that your forest is at least at Windows 2003 functional mode and that there's at least one Global Catalog server running Windows 2003 SP2 in each domain that supports an Exchange 2010 server. Exchange 2010 doesn't support read-only domain controllers.

Within an Exchange organization, you can mix Exchange 2010 servers with servers running Exchange 2007 SP1 or later and Exchange 2003 SP2 or later, but there's no support for earlier versions of Exchange. Just like Exchange 2007, you won’t be able to upgrade an existing version of Exchange to the new release and will have to deploy new servers running Exchange 2010, then use the Move Mailbox feature to move users to the new servers. Details of deployment recommendations are still being worked out, but I expect that best practice will be to deploy servers running the Hub Transport (and Edge Transport) and Client Access roles first, followed by Mailbox servers.

Tons of New Developments
There are many other changes in Exchange 2010. Public folders persist, but some APIs (e.g., CDOEX, WebDAV, ExOLEDB) are replaced by Exchange Web Services. Unified messaging gains features such as a message waiting indicator and a personal auto attendant that can configure rules for how to answer incoming calls. You can expect Microsoft to connect Exchange better with Office Communications Server and its Windows Rights Management Services, bringing different strands of its information worker strategy closer together.

Microsoft still has tons of work to do before Exchange 2010 becomes a shrink-wrapped product, but all indications from the beta versions are that the new release will deliver some interesting and valuable functionality. Like any release, things can change before Microsoft ships the final software, including the elimination of features that don’t meet goals for functionality or quality. However, given that Exchange 2010 doesn't represent the same kind of generational change represented by the move from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007, I expect that the bulk of the functionality that exists in today’s builds will appear in the final release. The changes in the new version collectively represent nearly three years’ hard work by a large development group, so you can expect to be busy learning all about Exchange 2010 in the coming months.

End of Article

   Previous  1  2  [3]  Next  


Reader Comments
Tony, Microsoft lost his way for the Exchange Server and you do not help with your current allways-praise-all-new-versions attitude. Can't you see that Microsoft forgot the upgrade option? Before Exchange 2007 we could upgrade whatever we had to new versions using the in-place upgrades. Now, we cannot upgrade anything. Is it good?
Exchange shops bought new 64-bit machines to upgrade to exchange 2007 and now again they will be forced to buy newer machines just to upgrade!

Microsoft lost its mind. So did many Exchange experts.

muraty April 15, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Microsoft hasn't forgotten the upgrade option. They just learned from Exchange 2003 how difficult it is to engineer reliable upgrades for all of the circumstances that exist in installations around the world and they learned from Exchange 2007 how smoothly deployments can go when you build servers from scratch. Given that there is a new database schema (8KB to 32KB page size etc.) and a new OS (Windows 2008) for most people, it's inconceivable in my mind to even consider an in-place upgrade. Do you really want to take servers offline for many hours to upgrade a database, upgrade the OS, and then upgrade Exchange? Much better to install a new server, get it working right, and then move mailboxes. A moving train approach (setup new server, move mailboxes from old server, recycle old server) is the way to approach this move.

As to always having a positive view on new versions, well, I like progress... what can I say? And I think Exchange 2010 is progress. What would you expect Microsoft to do - not develop new releases? Not include new features? Not attempt to automate common tasks?

TRedmond April 16, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Tony, databases allways change. It is not an obstacle to upgrade. Microsoft could succesfully upgrade Exchange 5.5 databases to Exchange 2000 databases, which were superior to 5.5 ones.
Microsoft could also upgrade 16-bit Windows 3.0 to 32-bit Windows 95, 14 years ago.
And now, after all these technical advances, we can not upgrade exchange 2007 databases to exchange 2010 databases, we cannot upgrade 32-bit OSs to 64-bit OS, even we cannot upgrade Windows Mobile 5.0 to Windows Mobile 6.0 and so on. And you say Microsoft hasn't forgotten how to upgrade?
Exchange Server advances in the wrong direction since exchange 2007.

muraty April 17, 2009 (Article Rating: )


What about the licensing stuff? Is Microsoft going to go back to allowing the install of the Outlook client that ships with Exchange 2010 as long as you had purchased the CALS, just like up through Exchange 2003? Or are they going to maintain the ripoff deal like Exchange/Outlook 2007 and require customers to buy the full Office 2010 package or subscribe to Software Assurance in order to be able to install Outlook 2010?

JimMurph501 April 21, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Tony, in Exchange Server 2007,
if you only had to support internal Outlook clients
(that's a "big" if),
you did not have to have a Client Access Server role.
You only needed the Mailbox Server role
and the Hub Transport Server role.

Now. with Exchange Server 2010,
even if you only have to support internal Outlook clients,
you will need the Client Access Server role as well,
because of the new component you mentioned
called "RPC Client Access Layer".

Am I correct in assuming this?

dkalemis April 24, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Tony

I found the article informative and interesting. I tend to agree with some that praise it not always deserved, on the other hand I do agree with you that they are moving in the right direction. My biggest disappointment is their reluctance to invest the resources necessary to move the exchange databases to SQL Server. Sometimes it makes no sense at all to me why they have not done this already. They dump how many man-hours and resources into developing high-availability, recoverability and scalability into their new releases of exchange when a lot of those options already exist in SQl Server. It seems like they are re-inventing a large part of the wheel here and in the process torturing us Exchange Administrators by getting us so close to what we need that we can taste it and then never really getting there. For instance - why is LCR restricted to a single database on a storage group? This would not be an issue with SQL server.

As I said - they are moving inthe right direction, which is good, but when I hear things like "...the engineering investment to do this proved too great..." it makes me cringe. Too great?! For one of their core business aps?! Sorry - I find that hard to believe. On the other hand - when you're the '500 pound gorilla', how much does it really matter what other people think?

ccardwell May 28, 2009 (Article Rating: )


Tony,

You mention in your article that Exchange compresses attachments in the store - this is contrary to the information I have from Microsoft - they have stated that only the email headers and body text/html are compressed.

These are the easily compressed parts of the mail object (low CPU cost) as opposed to attachments which would be CPU intensive and grind Exchange to a halt.

.. Ken

kjhughes July 14, 2009 (Article Rating: )


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Microsoft, News Corp. Discuss Locking Out Google

Microsoft and Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. recently discussed an alliance that would counter Google's fledgling online news service. ...

2009 Windows IT Pro Editors' Best and Community Choice Awards

Picking a favorite product from an impressive crowd of competitive offerings is never an easy task, and such was the case with our Editors' Best and Community Choice awards this year. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...


Related Articles Looking at Email as a Service

Improvements We'd Like to See for Exchange Server

Microsoft Releases Exchange Server Developer Roadmap

Exchange’s Evolving Strategy

Exchange Server and Outlook Whitepapers Email Controls and Regulatory Compliance

Take Control of Your Email: Understand the Business Reasons for Email Storage Management

Related Events The Easiest Way to Save Time and Money on E-mail and SharePoint Management

Bail Out Your Exchange Environment

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Exchange Server and Outlook eBooks Spam Fighting and Email Security for the 21st Century

Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

The Expert's Guide for Exchange 2003: Preparing for, Moving to, and Supporting Exchange Server 2003

Related Exchange Server and Outlook Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format

Exchange & Outlook UPDATE eNewsletter
News, strategies, products, and developments in Exchange Server and Outlook messaging.

Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement