Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


August 09, 2002

Media Player Software License Chicanery

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Licensing Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

In last month's commentary, I wrote that I had installed Microsoft Software Update Services (SUS) on one of my servers. Because SUS is a new program on my network, I watched it closely for several weeks, so I was more aware of new Microsoft security fixes than I typically would be. That increased attention is probably the only reason I noticed a little poison pill in a recent patch.

Late last month, three potentially scary bugs surfaced in Windows Media Player (WMP). One of the most serious bugs could let someone sit down at your computer and assume Administrator-like powers, so Microsoft made a downloadable patch available for each of the three WMP versions. I imagine that millions of people have downloaded and installed this patch, but I wonder how many noticed the following text in the software license:

"Digital Rights Management (Security). You agree that in order to protect the integrity of content and software protected by digital rights management ('Secure Content'), Microsoft may provide security related updates to the OS Components that will be automatically downloaded onto your computer. These security related updates may disable your ability to copy and/or play Secure Content and use other software on your computer. If we provide such a security update, we will use reasonable efforts to post notices on a web site explaining the update."

I didn't take that quote out of context; I copied the quoted paragraph directly from the license agreement. (I wonder when Microsoft will disable the Copy feature in its licenses—the content is always such a good source of journalistic fodder.) To paraphrase the quoted material: When Microsoft sold you a copy of Windows XP, the bundle included WMP, which has defects that the company judges to be severe enough that everyone should fix them as soon as possible. Microsoft has repaired the defect, but you can't have the fix unless you give the company the right to control the software you use on your computer.

By accepting this agreement, you're saying that Microsoft can include new code in WMP that lets the company remotely control your copy of WMP. With that control, Microsoft can direct WMP to download new software that will "disable your ability to ... use other software on your computer." Microsoft won't send you an email message warning you that it's installing spyware—a program that acts as Microsoft's "software cop"—on your computer, but the company will post a warning on a Web site—somewhere. It wouldn't be that much of a leap to say that one way to disable your ability to run illegal software would be to tell Microsoft that you're doing it so that the company can sic the software anti-piracy dogs on you. Yikes.

But that's not all. Read the software license a bit further, and you'll see an old bit of silliness that I've often commented on: The second half of the license is in French. As far as I know, I downloaded the English version of WMP, so I'm puzzled why I have to consent to an agreement, half of which is written in another language. Yes, I know, Microsoft uses this approach for the convenience of Canada, where English and French are both official languages (and for any other country with English and French as its two official languages, although I don't know of any that fit that description besides Canada); I have no complaint with that. But why can't Microsoft amend the language of the agreement to say that if I'm not a Francophone, I'm not bound by half of an agreement that I can't understand? (I hope I didn't agree in French to mow Bill's lawn for the rest of my life.)

Don't get me wrong: I'm a fanatic about copyrights, and people who steal music, software, books, or the like are pathetic thieves in my opinion. So I understand Microsoft's desire to protect its copyrights. But I believe the company has crossed a line here by including text that basically means "let us install any software that we deem necessary whenever we deem it necessary ... or live without security fixes."

Maybe I'll live without that patch after all. Apple Computer's QuickTime player plays MPEGs, if I remember right ...

If you're concerned about giving Microsoft this kind of control over your software use, let the company know how you feel. Visit Microsoft's home page and click Contact Us.

End of Article



Reader Comments
The language in Microsoft's license agreements makes me never want to install their software on my computer. It only confirms my suspicions of their intention to snoop on my computer. The computer is a tool that I use, and pay for. It is not a for them or anyone else to spy on my habits. Can you imagine if every refrigerator came with a camera installed in it? So the food industry can monitor what you eat! Oh, and if you happen to have anything illegal in your refrigerator, or like to cook naked, watch out!

From now on I'm only buy software labelled "Big Brother not included". I only wish the general public had the saavy to do the same. But therein lies Microsoft's success. "There's a sucker born every minute."

Ben Dover (for Microsoft) August 12, 2002


SP3 AutoUpdate is the reason for the new verbage, but the lawyers went overboard as usual and gave them rights to do the unreasonable. This is another clear disconnect between developer, mgmt. and the public. I'm still concerned about the passing of play info from media player to anyone so as soon as the consent agreement is implemented I'll be replacing MS Media Player with something else!

Sam August 14, 2002


You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Confirmed: Battery Life Issues Not Windows 7's Fault

Microsoft on Monday issued a lengthy statement about the recent Windows 7 battery controversy, echoing my assessment from earlier in the day, but backing it up with hard, cold evidence. ...

Microsoft Warns of Windows Version Expirations

Microsoft warned that this year will see three out-of-date Windows versions slip into retirement. ...

Battery Life Issues Almost Certainly Not Windows 7's Fault

While Microsoft is still investigating a notebook battery life issue that was supposedly caused by Windows 7, some interesting trends have emerged. ...


Windows OSs Whitepapers Protecting Microsoft SharePoint

Related Events Deep Dive into Windows Server 2008 R2 presented by John Savill

Windows, Unix, Linux Interoperability

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement