Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


April 10, 2001

A Closer Look at Windows XP Product Activation

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Licensing Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

In last week's Windows 2000 Magazine UPDATE, I discussed some of the more confusing aspects of Windows XP Beta 2, but the controversial Windows Product Activation (WPA) feature, which ties each copy of Windows XP to a specific PC, remains a big stumbling block for most people. WPA was designed to prevent casual piracy—such as when a user buys one copy of Windows and then lets a friend or family member install it on his or her PC as well. According to some estimates, this type of copying represents about half of the software piracy-related financial losses the industry suffers each year. In other words, piracy isn't limited to counterfeiters. But many users are concerned that WPA will be inordinately prohibitive and might actually prevent them from using their systems in some cases. I spoke with Allen Nieman, a product manager for Licensing Technologies at Microsoft, to clear up the confusion about WPA.

First, corporate customers that buy Windows XP volume licenses, such as those provided by the Microsoft Open License, Microsoft Select, or Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, won't need to deal with WPA at all; those versions of Windows XP will not include WPA. "Most business customers would qualify for an Open License, but they don't realize that," Nieman said, suggesting that corporate customers who are purchasing Windows products through retail channels look into this option.

For those of us who must deal with WPA, however, the first concept to understand is that WPA and product registration are two different things. A Windows XP-based PC must be activated, but you don't need to register the product. "Based on customer feedback," Nieman said, "we've made changes to the UI post-Beta 2 to make the changes more obvious." You can handle activation by Internet or by phone. For customers living outside the United States and Canada, Microsoft is working to ensure that the phone-based activation process goes as smoothly as possible. Microsoft will make toll-free phone activation available to most customers around the world. For most of those who lack a toll-free option, the call will be local. And for the few locations in which neither option is available, customers can call collect (or the local version of collect) to activate Windows XP: Microsoft will pay for the phone call.

"Microsoft has customer service centers in several countries throughout the world that will be taking the activation phone calls," Nieman told me. "The centers are local or regional depending on telephony and language requirements. At a minimum, all of the languages into which Windows XP is localized—as well as a few others—will be supported for telephone activation."

If you don't activate Windows XP for 30 days (2 weeks during the beta), you'll have to activate it the next time the system boots to continue using it normally (Windows XP won't disrupt an active session). But you have no grace period once the activation time limit is reached: When the system is restarted, you have to activate the product or you'll be logged off the system immediately. The computer will boot, but you won't be able to get past the Welcome screen (if you use the Home Edition or Professional Edition in a workgroup) or logon dialog (if you use the Professional Edition in a domain). Unlike Office XP, Windows XP has no reduced functionality mode. Nieman notes that dismissing the activation reminder three times is more work than actually activating the product: Microsoft has ensured that the process is quick and painless, especially for Internet activations.

Regarding questions about what hardware changes would trigger a reactivation, Nieman told me that the reality is, as expected, less dramatic than what many people fear. "Basically, if you do a substantial upgrade, you'll be asked to reactivate," he said. "Standard upgrades—adding a new hard drive or network card, for example—won't require you to reactivate." Also, making many changes to your system will eventually trigger a need to reactivate. Nieman compared the hardware configuration check to the one Windows uses to determine whether you need a new driver when you add hardware to your system and then reboot. For security reasons, Microsoft won't say what exactly triggers the reactivation.

"What we're doing is reducing piracy," Nieman said. "Is it perfect? No. But we want to do it in such a way that users are not denied their rights to use the product. So we're going to err on the side of the user." If you mistakenly activate Windows on one machine and must activate it on another—or you buy a new PC and want to install Windows XP on it instead of the old PC—simply call Microsoft. The company will reactivate with no questions asked. Nieman says the company realizes that customers will need to use phone reactivation for various reasons and won't make it difficult.

And finally, licensing isn't yet finalized, so it's possible that Microsoft will figure out a way to devise a "home" or "individual" license, but that's currently up in the air. The problem is that doing so would affect all of the company's other licenses and products, so it's more complicated than is immediately obvious. If Microsoft were to grant individuals a two-PC license for Windows XP for, say, $130, wouldn't small businesses want a similar deal? And if they couldn't get a similar deal, wouldn't they just buy the individual licenses instead? According to Nieman, Microsoft is still working to meet this challenge.

In short, WPA is the current bugaboo in the industry, but a year from now, we'll probably wonder what the controversy was all about. Microsoft is simply protecting the licenses that are already in place—while not making it unduly difficult for users to get up and running with the new system. If you have any further questions about WPA, please don't hesitate to contact me.

End of Article



Reader Comments
It is certainly true that Microsft can do what ever they want on the license/activation front, and I can choose to not upgrade to their new product.
They have "suffered" so much in their sales and profits that we can all have sympathy for them. I have never been a Microsoft basher, but I am changing my mind. They have begun to exhibit typical momopolistic behavior, increasing prices, and being more restrictive in their use license. They can do it because they have no effective competition in the Operating System market.
For the forseeable future I will use the copy of Win2K I own for any machines I buy (I have a desktop and a portable), and with any luck, when the changing hardware requires a new Operating System, Linux will have matured to the point that it is an alternative.
When they had competition, they were innovative and led the field (the Office Suite), now they are fat and can increase prices and reduce innovation with immunity. I suspect that Microsoft will find that there are many people who feel as I do.

Shaun April 11, 2001


This person is defenetly intitled to his own opinion, but I think that Microsoft has a right to do what they're doing. . . He KNOWS that he would do the same thing if he were in MS's posistion! I WOULD TOO WITHOUT A DOUBT AND I ADMIT IT. And what's this talk of NO COMPETITION? If threre were no competition in the market, WINDOWS XP would turn out to be Windows ME SE. . .The whole reason that Microsoft is making WINDOWS XP based on the Windows NT/2000 kernal and doing a face lift to it is because they don't want you to go out and buy a MAC because the new OS looks good and is very stable due to the UNIX core!

So think carefully before you just go strewing words around.

Mohammad April 26, 2001


WPA in XP will be hacked and anyone who wants to run XP without activiation will do so. Microsoft is doing what it thinks is best to protect its copyright. At the time, users will do what they can to make their PCs usuable without annoyances like WPA.

sir real May 02, 2001


I do not plan to use the WPA feature. I will get a crack. YES I will goout and purchase a legal copy NO i will not use WPA. I do not believe in purchasing something that is usable with dependancy on the company of origin. (this is one reason I am so displeased with audible.com) what if audible or microsoft go out of buisness ? not my windows XP and my Audible Books that I PAID FOR (and no I did not pay for a temporary license) are useless ?? !!! This is not acceptable.

Chris Taylor May 14, 2001


Microsoft just created a lucrative black market in NON-WPA software. Users who previously would look askance at buying an illegal copy will now see this as 'a strike against the machine'. Mark my words...

Rich May 15, 2001


What about PC Technicians? Won't the WPA have an adverse effect on these people? If you have to call Microsoft every time that you change some hardware in a system, this will lead to normal PC repair taking much longer than it currently does. This means more money spent by the end user in the long run, since all PC repair shops charge by the hour. I can see why Microsoft wants a anti-piracy program in effect for it's operating system, but i can see nothing but headaches for the PC tech and average user alike.

Devin May 23, 2001


What about the fact that using an install CD that was previously used, but no longer used (the machine is defunct, the hard disk it was on crashed, it was formatted to install something else, etc) is legal? This tactic of tying it directly to the hardware will incidentally make all sorts of cash for MS from those of us who have three or four machines, and three or four discs from various versions of Windows that we wipe off our old boxen when upgrade time comes, and put on the new ones...

mosh May 24, 2001


If this does not scare you, it should!! Do you really want Microsoft to have this kind of control? This effectively ends a perpetual license--over when, how and where the OS is installed. Once they stop issuing product codes, you will be forced to upgrade or move to another OS. You won't be able to reinstall the product forever. Ok, granted most people won't use an old OS, but I have an older machine still running Windows For Workgroups, and can reinstall it whenever I need to without worrying. I personally will not upgrade to XP if this is implemented. I am currently learning Linux, too.

C Williams May 24, 2001


The statement "First, corporate customers that buy Windows XP volume licenses, such as those provided by the Microsoft Open License, Microsoft Select, or Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, won't need to deal with WPA at all; those versions of Windows XP will not include WPA." is not correct. The volume license software is the same as the retail software. WPA code is still there. The difference is in the key. The volume license key activates the software without the need for it to call home. The bottom line is that the self-destruct code is in all copies of Windows XP -- waiting for a bug (or a virus) to trigger it.

Stewart Berman June 14, 2001


I can no longer be a supporter of Microsoft. I agree with all of the other
comments. I can make a choice not to upgrade. MS has just provoked more piracy
than they ever had. If I were to purchase an upgrade, I will have also obtained
a crack for the program. I own several pcs of various vintages, I upgrade frequently
and do not need to be annoyed by yet another inconvenience... They should re-think
this approach. Fewer customers and more pirates doesn't sound like the right path.
I will also be looking at Linux... Alienate a few more people and see what happens..

hsutphin June 15, 2001


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Battery Life Issues Almost Certainly Not Windows 7's Fault

While Microsoft is still investigating a notebook battery life issue that was supposedly caused by Windows 7, some interesting trends have emerged. ...

Confirmed: Battery Life Issues Not Windows 7's Fault

Microsoft on Monday issued a lengthy statement about the recent Windows 7 battery controversy, echoing my assessment from earlier in the day, but backing it up with hard, cold evidence. Put simply, Windows 7 is not responsible for any battery life issues ...

Getting your iPhone to Sync with Exchange 2003

Follow these steps to use an iPhone with Exchange. ...


Related Events Deep Dive into Windows Server 2008 R2 presented by John Savill

Windows, Unix, Linux Interoperability

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement