While being deposed in a Microsoft lawsuit against Google, former Microsoft executive and Windows NT architect Mark Lucovsky stated that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer threatened to "kill" Google when he learned that Lucovsky was leaving Microsoft to join Google. Ballmer allegedly made the threat during a chair-throwing tirade in which he also threatened Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Ballmer denies that it happened that way, however.
According to Lucovsky, when he informed Ballmer last year that he was leaving Microsoft, Ballmer asked him whether he was leaving to join Google. When Lucovsky said that he was, the famously volatile Ballmer picked up a chair in his office and hurled it at the wall. "I'm going to [expletive deleted] bury [Schmidt]," Ballmer said. "I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to [expletive deleted] kill Google." Schmidt was formerly an executive at Novell and Sun Microsystems--two companies that were, indeed, adversely affected by Microsoft's market success.
Ballmer has categorized Lucovsky's recollection of the meeting as "a gross exaggeration of what actually took place. Mark's decision to leave was disappointing, and I urged him strongly to change his mind," Ballmer said. "But his characterization of that meeting is not accurate." Lucovsky was a Distinguished Engineer and Windows Server Architect at Microsoft. As I noted in "Windows Server 2003: The Road To Gold Part One: The Early Years" (see the URL below), he joined Microsoft with the original wave of ex-Digital Equipment employees who accompanied NT architect Dave Cutler. Lucovsky was widely regarded at Microsoft for his technical acumen and is one of the most impressive people I've ever met.
The deposition came to light because of a recent lawsuit over ex-Microsoft researcher Kai-Fu Lee, who left the software giant earlier this year to join Google. Microsoft sued Google over the hire, citing Lee's employment agreement, which specified that he couldn't work for a direct Microsoft competitor for at least 1 year after leaving the company. Despite its posturing, recently revealed documents indicate that Google was aware of the agreement and, in the event of a Microsoft lawsuit, had made contingency plans to keep Lee on paid leave until he could begin working for Google. Microsoft also alleges that Lee sent Google some confidential Microsoft information before he left the company.
Ballmer's alleged behavior harkens back to Microsoft's US antitrust lawsuit, during which similar exchanges between various Microsoft executives were detailed. However, it's important to point out that Ballmer never threatened to actually break the law to "bury" or "kill" Schmidt or Google. Microsoft shareholders should be happy that the company's CEO is that aggressively competitive. Arguably, they should expect no less.
End of Article
"Ballmer denies that it happened that way, however."
Of course.
Monkey boy strikes again.
(and oh, btw....*yawn*)
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
Self-aggrandizing ("As I noted in my seminal showcase") and opinionated ("Microsoft shareholders should be happy that the CEO of the company is that aggressively competitive") as usual, aren't we, Paul? So much for this being a "news" site. It should be labeled for what it is: Editorial.
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
While I can agree that Ballmer should be agressively competitive, I feel his childish reaction should be noted. This is the behavior of a monolith organization on its way out. Microsoft uses latent intimidation, abuses monopolistic power, and forces upgrades in its daily business tactics. Innovation is only part of the company's tired excuses for its oppressive actions. Also important to note, IBM used these same tactics and excuses some 15 or 20 years ago.
The point here is that powerful companies always develop FDH syndrome ... Fat, Dumb, and Happy disease. Rather than innovate, they threaten.
I predict there will be a relatively fast evolution away from Microsoft's products and to the Open Source alternatives that will be maturing and innovating while Redmond continues its childish behavior. Windows Server 2003 and Windows Vista could prove to be Microsoft's last meaningful contributions to the industry.
mwrisner September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
Well, I can't see anything more appropriate to say at this time other than:
APPLE SUCKS!!!! www.apple.com/switchtoamoreexpensiveOS
I HOPE CREATIVE KILLS APPLE!! SUE SUE SUE SUE! Let the hippies die a slow death!!
Erm, sorry lost my composure there.
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
Hey, look! Ballmer's posting here now! Gosh, Steve, we're so happy to see such aggressive posturing. It really befits such an important global company to have such a composed and professional CEO.
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
Windows XP Professional (Amazon.com): $249.88 Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger (Amazon.com): $99.88 SuSE Linux Professional 9.3 (Amazon.com): $77.99
Nice try, though.
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
How much would you expect to pay for this great Windows OS??? 500?? No 1000??? Ladies and gentlemen I am happy to announce that windows 3.0 for just--you heard it here first--100 dollars, that's right, you get file explorer, notepad, control panel, and other great features for this great price!!!! ACT NOW!!!
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
YOu would have to be retarted to pay that much for windows. lol!!
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
"Windows XP Professional (Amazon.com): $249.88 Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger (Amazon.com): $99.88 SuSE Linux Professional 9.3 (Amazon.com): $77.99 "
Windows XP HOME (Amazon.com): $94.99 and it's not like it's missing anything the average user would notice.
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
"Windows XP HOME (Amazon.com): $94.99 and it's not like it's missing anything the average user would notice."
But you have to compare OS X with Windows XP Professional because OS X comes built-in with features that surpass Home Edition (and Professional, too) but at a lower price.
I guess another anti-Apple argument from the beleaguered Windows kidz crumbles to dust.
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: )
You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor?
Register now
An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some more Windows 7 sales momentum, some Sophos stupidity, Microsoft's cloud computing self-loathing, more whining from the browser makers, Zoho's "Fake Office," and much, much more ...
Let Your Users Reset Their Own Passwords: Free Download Try a 30 day free trial of Desktop Authority Password Self-Service – it provides an easy-to-use, robust system for allowing users to reset their own forgotten passwords or locked accounts.
Get Windows IT Pro & Mark Minasi’s Favorite Power Tools Guide Order Windows IT Pro now and get "More of Mark Minasi's Favorite Power Tools"--a in-depth guide to the most useful Windows commands --FREE with your paid order! Subscribe today, and save 58% off the cover price!
Deep Dive into VMware vSphere, eLearning Series Join John Savill to explore the major functionality capabilities of the vSphere virtualization platform, including identification of the changes from ESX 3.5.
Of course.
Monkey boy strikes again.
(and oh, btw....*yawn*)
Anonymous User September 06, 2005 (Article Rating: