Windows IT Pro is the leading independent community for IT professionals deploying Microsoft Windows server and client applications and technologies.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


December 19, 2003

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of December 22

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news...

My Opinion of Real vs. Microsoft
Sorry Microsoft haters, but RealNetworks is out of line. As the company noted in the press release announcing its antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft, RealNetworks has more than 1 million subscribers to paid content, and 250,000 subscribers pay monthly fees for its RHAPSODY music service. But those boasts aren't the only reasons why RealNetworks' lawsuit is doomed; after all, during Microsoft's initial antitrust trial, Netscape also boasted about its number of users, and we all know what happened to that company. No, RealNetworks is doomed for two specific reasons. First, market conditions are different now. Thanks to the success of Apple Computer's iTunes Music Store and downloadable digital content in general, RealNetworks can hardly claim that Microsoft's inclusion of Windows Media Player (WMP) in Windows has shut out competition. If anything, Microsoft's inexpensive Windows Media-format licensing terms have aided competition: A slew of Windows Media-compatible players, services, and digital devices have hit the market in recent months. Second, and perhaps most damaging to RealNetworks, Microsoft's offerings are obviously superior to what RealNetworks sells. Microsoft's media player, media formats, and underlying technologies are all better than anything RealNetworks (or Apple, or anyone else) offers, as the widespread licensing of these products proves. Long-time readers know that I would be the first person to come down on Microsoft for antitrust violations. Heck, I called for the company to be broken up for its transgressions in United States vs. Microsoft. But this lawsuit has no merit. In corporate competition, as in sports, the best team often simply wins. That's the case here.

Counterpoint: Microsoft Shortcomings
But I'll say this: Microsoft hasn't designed Windows properly when it comes to add-on products such as Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) and WMP. Quite simply, Microsoft has no reason not to create these products in a more elegant, componentized fashion that separates the end-user UI from the underlying technology, thereby simplifying the removal of these products from Windows and leaving the supporting services available for other applications and Windows to use. I've had this conversation many times with various Microsoft folks: If Microsoft had made Windows correctly, removing IE wouldn't be a concern, and the same is true of WMP. I firmly believe that the end user should be able to remove any applications, including WMP, from Windows. If you don't want it, you shouldn't have to use it, and Windows should be intelligent enough to handle its absence seamlessly. I hope Windows Longhorn, currently due in late 2005, will address this problem.

Wal-Mart Opens Online Music Store
Speaking of the many companies that have opted to license Microsoft's Windows Media formats, retail superstore Wal-Mart yesterday opened its online music store, Music Downloads. Like all non-Apple stores, Wal-Mart uses Microsoft's Windows Media Audio (WMA) 9 format to encode its music, but the company is offering tracks at a somewhat discounted rate, at 88 cents apiece. (Albums typically cost $9.44.) Apparently, the current version of the store is a test, and Wal-Mart is hoping to receive some customer feedback before the music store's wide-scale rollout in 2004.

Investigating Windows XP SP2
I've been looking at the new Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) beta, and a few things stand out. First, when the system reboots for the first time after installation, the OS gives you the option to enable Automatic Updates immediately, before you log on. Microsoft has significantly updated Windows Update with a new Express Installation option that downloads and installs all the critical and security updates your computer needs. The new Internet Connection Firewall (ICF), enabled by default, now appears prominently in the Control Panel Network and Internet Connections applet, and ICF now comes with a multitab configuration window that contains numerous options. (In the original version, the only obvious UI was one check box, which let you turn ICF on or off.) Microsoft has updated IE 6 to version 6.0.2900.2055, and IE now includes pop-up ad blocking, a feature that will announce itself the first time a Web site attempts to launch a pop-up ad. You can also easily manage the way IE handles pop-up ads, which is useful. Also, IE now includes a Manage Add-ons configuration utility that lets you enable or disable the new types of plug-ins this browser supports. And Microsoft Outlook Express (also version 6.0.2900.2055), like Microsoft Office Outlook 2003, now blocks images in HTML email by default, offering a button that you can click to enable the images on a case-by-case basis. Overall, SP2 has the look of a major XP update, and I'll be previewing it soon on my SuperSite for Windows.

Sun Blasts Microsoft's Product-Removal Stunt
Sun Microsystems Executive Vice President Jonathan Schwartz said that Microsoft's recent announcement of its removal of Java-enabled products from the Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) shows how out of touch the company is with its customers. "Microsoft's recent unilateral decision to discontinue support for Windows 98 and other products as of December 23, 2003, offers users a lesson, and an opportunity," Schwartz wrote in an open letter to Sun's customers. "It's a lesson in how a company with legendary market dominance can lose sight of customer priorities and force an unnecessary transition onto a customer base already paralyzed by viruses and security breaches. It's also an opportunity to explore a world of alternatives that Sun and the open community are creating to deliver a more affordable and secure desktop operating environment--called the Java Desktop System." Ah yes, throwing that little marketing angle in there at the end is essential.

Microsoft and New York Align to Sue Spammers
Microsoft and the state of New York announced Thursday joint lawsuits against one of the nation's most egregious spammers. The suits target Scott Richter, currently listed as the third most prolific sender of spam in the world, according to spam researchers. Richter is accused of sending illegal spam messages in 35 countries and disguising the email so that consumers can't trace it. "Deceptive and illegal spam, like the kind we're attacking today, is overwhelming legitimate email and threatening the promise and potential of the Internet for all of us," Brad Smith, senior vice president and general counsel at Microsoft, said. The move comes just 1 day after President George W. Bush signed the nation's first antispam bill into law.

Austin, Texas: The Next Munich?
The city of Austin, Texas, is apparently considering a move to a hybrid open-source software (OOS) solution, with some desktops running Linux and others using Microsoft's proprietary Windows system. But don't start plastering bumper stickers yet: If Austin does ultimately move to this hybrid solution--and it's not yet a certainty--the decision to do so is still many months away and will be phased in over a long time. The impetus behind the possibility is obvious: Austin is facing a $30 million budget shortfall, and it's paying Microsoft more than $3 million in licensing fees. The inevitable question is this: How much will taxpayers end up paying city employees to train on, install, and support Linux?

End of Article



Reader Comments
Why is your text so small when view in Mozilla browsers? HELP!

StrainedEye December 19, 2003


Connectix *IS* a distant competitor. I've used both products extensively, and VMware's support of NAT, and other crucial technologies makes it a far better product. Besides, if numbers matter in this equation. VMware *does* hold a substantial lead in seats. Food for thought.

Michael Mullin December 19, 2003


Microsoft got the better technology in Virtual PC? I don't think I would agree with that. I used both products and have paid for updates to both products through a number of versions. My personal experience is that VMware performed better and had smaller overall virtual disk files when compared to Virtual PC. In addition, with VMWare you are able to simulate Windows and Netware clusters and until the release of VPC 2004, have multiple NICs in your virtual machine to test software like MS ISA server and BorderManager.

Virtual PC, in my opinion, has a friendlier interface and figured out how to create a GUI to implement differencing disks (BIG BIG ADVANTAGE vs VMWare with its manual process). But my overall experience has been much better with VMware than with Virtual PC.

Herb Numrich December 19, 2003


"Microsoft's offerings are quite obviously superior to what Real sells: Its media player, media formats, and underlying technologies are all better than anything Real (or Apple, or anyone else) offers, as proven by the widespread licensing of these products."

Mass licensing = quality superiority? You really think Microsoft's media formats would get this same spread of licensing if Windows maintained only, say, 5-10% of total computer marketshare? I can't really say which is the BEST over what I prefer, but WMA (and such) licensing is really due to it's installed base rather than it's supposed superior quality. If you think otherwise, you really are fooling yourself and your objectivity comes into question.

"Titanic" isn't the best movie made because it holds the box office record.

BeeGee December 19, 2003


OpenOffice runs under Windows as well, so the only retraining required of the Austin city employees using OOo is for using a different office suite.

Roberto Esguerra December 19, 2003


I usually agree with you on most things, but I have to say - as an early adapter of VM technology I have to disagree with you I own both Virtual PC and VMware and Vmware’s virtualization technology is by far the superior technology. Your should run benchmarks against both and I think you may re-think your statement. Apart from Virtual PC's numerous bug, which by the way they do a poor job of patching, they lack an enterprise/server solution, which VMware does have. Give it a try – I’d love to finally see you publicly re-tract/have a change of heart - that would show all those anti-Microsoft bigots that you’re a bigger person.


Editor's note: I've tried both and do prefer VPC (which also runs on the Mac, which is handy), but then I've not spent a lot of time with the latest version of VMWare. I'll be speaking with those guys this week, however, and will take a look at VMWare Workstation 4. --Paul

JC December 19, 2003


First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win.

How much would it cost taxpayers to pay city employees to train on, install, and support Linux?

...well less than you think, since this training and install is once only, and the supporting is much cheaper than paying billions to Microsoft until the end of time.

Jan Verelst December 21, 2003


Paul - A question about XP SP2. with the ICF now being enabled by default, have you noticed any issues running ICF with 3rd party firewalls?


Editor's note: I'm not sure why it'd be beneficial to use both concurrently, but I haven't tried it yet. Is there a reason this would work? --Paul

James December 22, 2003


I have Windows Media Player, Quicktime, and Real Player on my computer and if it weren't for the fact that some people still provide content in Real Media format, I would have ditched real player a long time ago. The player is full of bugs and spyware and the quality of RM simply does not compare to that of Windows Media or Quicktime.

ksenia December 22, 2003


Paul - My concern is that when I push out the update the ICF will be enabled by default and will cause issues with those machines with a personal firewall already installed. I guess a more appropriate questiuon would have been "Is there anyway that you can change/modify the install routine for SP2 to NOT enable ICF by default"

James December 22, 2003


 See More Comments  1   2 

You must be a registered user or online subscriber to comment on this article. Please log on before posting a comment. Are you a new visitor? Register now




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 9, 2009

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including some more Windows 7 sales momentum, some Sophos stupidity, Microsoft's cloud computing self-loathing, more whining from the browser makers, Zoho's "Fake Office," and much, much more ...

Understanding File-Size Limits on NTFS and FAT

A general confusion about files sizes on FAT seems to stem from FAT32's file-size limit of 4GB and partition-size limit of 2TB. ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Getting Maximum Performance from Your Web-based Applications

Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Introducing Left-Brain.com, the online IT bookstore
Looking for books, CDs, toolkits, eBooks? Prime your mind at Left-Brain.com

Discover Windows IT Pro eLearning Series!
Clear & detailed technical information and helpful how-to's, all in our trademark no-nonsense format


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro DevProConnections IT Job Hound
Left-Brain.com Technology Resource Directory asp.netPRO ITTV Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 © 2009 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement